Skip to main content

The Hyperzone: Is There a Space on This Screen?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nature and Space in Contemporary Scottish Writing and Art

Part of the book series: Geocriticism and Spatial Literary Studies ((GSLS))

  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter turns to the digital domain to view the artists’ online practices and use of new technologies as creative interplays between tradition and innovation, between old and new patterns of perception of the space thus re-presented, in the in-between of materiality and virtuality, and of ‘real’ and imaginary Scotland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gervais borrows the term ‘semiosphere’ from Yuri Lotman’s 1990 monograph Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

  2. 2.

    Another form of support, this time non-financial, relates to the publication of reviews and excerpts and their distribution through literary magazines or dedicated websites. As for poetry, mention should be made of the Saturday Poem section in The Guardian and online resources such as poetryfoundation.org and scottishpoetrylibrary.org.uk

  3. 3.

    ‘The possibility of a relational art (an art that takes as its theoretical horizon the sphere of human interactions and its social context, rather than the assertion of an autonomous and private symbolic space) is testimony to the radical upheaval in aesthetic, cultural and political objectives brought about by modern art’ (Bourriaud 1998, p. 14).

  4. 4.

    Conversely, Alec Finlay’s interrelated blogs offer entries (or ‘posts’) displayed in reverse chronological order and accompanied by exhaustive exegetic content to be viewed by vertical scrolling with few or no gimmicky effects: see http://gathering-alecfinlay.blogspot.fr/ and http://alecfinlayblog.blogspot.fr/. Accessed 9 January 2019.

  5. 5.

    Research is very active in this area. A limited number of 4D films have recently been released in custom-built theatres and amusement parks, where simulated environmental effects (smoke, rain, wind and lightning, among others) are supplemented by motion effects such as the seats vibrating in synchronisation with the film. Although used by artists outside the mainstream entertainment market, these physical effects remain extremely costly and raise significant technical problems, which limit their use. In the field of olfactory art, for instance, the development, diffusion area and duration of artificial scents are particularly difficult to monitor.

  6. 6.

    Defined by the Faclair Beag Dictionary as (noun) a collection and anthology and (past participle) ‘the act of gathering, assembling, collecting and accumulating’. The project (2015–2018) was commissioned by Hauser & Wirth. It is a collaboration between, among others, Alec Finlay (poetry), Hannah Devereux and James Dyas Davidson (photography ), Gill Russell (maps and walks) and Rhynie Woman (‘foraging’). Yet another case of literary and scientific ‘doubling back’, the project was inspired by Adam Watson’s 1984 survey of The Place Names of Upper Deeside.

  7. 7.

    Facebook post, 27 August 2016.

  8. 8.

    Although its authorship remains disputed to this day, the statement is generally attributed to Gramsci and his ‘Letter from Prison’ dated 19 December 1929.

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. [2006] 2009. What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Trans. David Kishik and Stefan Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. [1936] 2008. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, Nicolas. [1998] 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Postproduction. Culture as Screenplay: How Art Reprograms the World. Trans. Jeanine Herman. New York: Lukas and Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Edward S. [1993] 2009. Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. New Haven: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, Michel. [1984] 2011. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven F. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, Bertrand. 2007. Is There a Text on This Screen? Reading in an Era of Hypertextuality. In A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, ed. Ray Siemens and Susan Schreibman, 182–202. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, Jaron. 2018. Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now. New York: Henry Hold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Yuri. 1990. Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, Jean-Luc. [2002] 2007. Listening. Trans. Charlotte Mandell. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, Garth. 2007. Sonic Immersion: Interactive Engagement in Realtime Immersive Environments. SCAN, Journal of Media Arts and Culture 4 (1). http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=90. Accessed 16 Mar 2019.

  • Rancière, Jacques. [2008] 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vouilloux, Bernard. 2008. Du dispositif. In Discours, Image, Dispositif. Penser la Representation II, ed. Philippe Ortel, 15–31. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, Donald. [1971] 1991. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manfredi, C. (2019). The Hyperzone: Is There a Space on This Screen?. In: Nature and Space in Contemporary Scottish Writing and Art. Geocriticism and Spatial Literary Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18760-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics