Skip to main content

Sustainability Cashflows

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability Valuation of Business

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Finance ((BRIEFSFINANCE))

  • 505 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter proposes a way to enter the transfers realized through sustainability channels to the system of business accounting. A system of business reporting can indicate sustainability values in its products along the three pillars of sustainability at each stage of resource procurement, production, and sales. It argues that the private sector and the public sector have enough information to establish such a system. This chapter discusses the concept of sustainability cashflows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, the similar situation is true for conventional valuation. Future cash flows are never published by official documents of business, and it is the valuers’ service to provide their own estimates.

  2. 2.

    Activities after the production stage until sold.

  3. 3.

    There may be policy failures, or certain sustainability regimes may find it difficult to recognize certain de jure sustainability values. Transfer to de facto sustainability will be delayed in such cases.

  4. 4.

    Table 3.3 elaborates the cashflow calculation.

Cited Works

  • Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2005). Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies (4th ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Amir, E. (1993). The market valuation of accounting information: The case of postretirement benefits other than pensions. The Accounting Review, 68, 703–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, P. J. (2009). Global financial crisis: The challenge to accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 803–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldvinsdottir, G., Mitchell, F., & Nørreklt, H. (2010). Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balint, T., Lamperti, F., Mandel, A., Napoletano, M., Roventitni, A., & Sapio, A. (2017). Complexity and the economics of climate change: A survey and a look forward. Ecological Economics, 138, 252–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, D. J. (2010). Understanding financial crisis through accounting models. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 676–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., & Constantinides, G. M. (Eds.). (1988). Theory of valuation: Frontiers for modern financial theory (Vol. 1). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. C. (1993). Economic efficiency, sustainability, and biodiversity. Ambio, 22(2–3), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R., & Myers, S. (2003). Principles of corporate finance. New York, NY: McGrow-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2006). Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: An overview of the conceptual landscape. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(2), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate citizenship and social responsibility policies in the United States of America. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. P. (2005). Recovering and extending classical and Marshallian foundations for post-Keynesian environmental economics. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 1(2), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., & Patten, B. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15(3), 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E., & J. Farley. (2004). Ecological economics: Principles and applications. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt, D., & Rothman, D. (1999). Figuring the costs of climate change: An assessment and critique. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 31(3), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, X. (2015). The essence, feature and role of low carbon economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(1), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P. (1999). European environmental taxes and charges: Recent experience, issues and trends. Ecological Economics, 31, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M., III. (2014). The measurement of environmental and resource values. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), 1875–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprints Network, The Ecological Wealth of Nations. (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R., & Daly, H. (1996). Environmental sustainability: Universal and non-negotiable. Ecological Applications, 6(4), 1002–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Lindenberger, D., Kummel, R., Kroeger, T., & Eichhorn, W. (2001). The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. BioScience, 51(8), 663–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, A. G., & Liston-Heyes, Catherine. (1995). Sustainable resource use: The search for meaning. Energy Policy, 23(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1988). Foundations for financial economics. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 50, 1345–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016). Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magano, T. (2013). A model for managing corporate sustainability. Business and Society Review, 118(20), 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsen, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, II(2), 661–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osteryoung, J., Derek, L., & Davies, L. (1997). Small firm finance: An entrepreneurial analysis. Forth Worth, TX: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, D. (2014). Corporate sustainability: Accounting standards vs tax by design. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., Schimidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Durand-Delacre, D., & Teksoz, K. (2017). SDG index and dashboards report. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions network (SDSN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success—and how you can too. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Change of course: Global business prospects for development and the environment. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Gibassier, D., & Zvezdov, D. (2013). Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 21(1), 4–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderholm, P. (2011). Taxing virgin natural resources: Lessons from aggregates taxation in Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(11), 911–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacchezzini, R., Melloni, G., & Lai, A. (2016). Sustainability management and reporting: The role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136(A), 102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taticchi, P., Carbone, P., & Albino, V. (Eds.). (2013). Corporate sustainability. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbooma, J., Alkemadeb, R., Klijna, J., Metzgerc, M. J., & Reijnena, R. (2006). Combining biodiversity modeling with political and economic development scenarios for 25 EU countries. Ecological Economics, 62(2), 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonghyup Oh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oh, Y. (2019). Sustainability Cashflows. In: Sustainability Valuation of Business. SpringerBriefs in Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18648-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics