Skip to main content

Evaluation System for the Public Institutions Employees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Economic Perspectives

Abstract

This paper reviews the trends in the evaluation system used for public administration in the context of adopting the New Public Management principles in public administration in order to evaluate the gaps and underline the future developments. The research is focused on theoretical and practical aspects and proposes a new approach for the evaluation of governmental services. The proposed evaluation system is mainly focused on indicators connected with the evaluation of the employees of the public institutions activity and gives a central role to the opinion of citizens, as main beneficiaries of the governmental services. It quantifies both aspects concerning policy and culture quality and human resources. The development and implementation can contribute to the improvement of overall evaluation of the public sector governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beia Consult. (2008). Developing a smart and transparent model for local public administration in relation to citizens [pdf]. Bucharest: Beia Consult. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from http://www.miteapl.ro/r1/studiu-9.pdf

  • Chlivickas, E., & RaudeliÅ«nienÄ—, J. (2007). Human resources potential in the public sector: The system of evaluation. Public Administration, 4(16), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Servants Code of Conduct Act. (2004). (c4). Bucharest: RP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Servants Statute Act. (1999). (c10). Bucharest: RP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Directive 2000/C364/01 of 7 December 2000 on Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Regulation 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC) of 14th of June 1962 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leon, L. (1996). Ethics and entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Simone, S., Cicotto, G., Pinna, R., & Giustiniano, L. (2016). Engaging public servants: Public service motivation, work engagement and work-related stress. Management Decision, 54(7), 1569–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Bassel, N., Guterman, N., Bargal, D., & Su-Kuo, H. (1998). Main and buffering effects of emotional support on job and health related strains: A national survey of Israeli social workers. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldor, L. (2017). Public service sector: The compassionate workplace. The effect of compassion and stress on employee engagement, burnout, and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Secretariat of the Romanian Government Order 400/2015 of 22 June 2015 for the approval of the Code of Internal/Managerial Control of Public Entities [pdf]. Bucharest. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from http://www.ub.ro/files/scim/Ordin_400_2015.pdf

  • Hart, D. K., & Grant, N. K. (1989). A partnership in virtue among all citizens: The public service and civic humanism; response to David Kirk Hart. Public Administration Review, 49, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalimullah, N. A., Alam, K. M., & Nour, M. M. A. (2012). New public management: Emergence and principles. BUP Journal, 1(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. E. (1987). Public and private leadership. In J. Kooiman & K. A. Eliassen (Eds.), Managing public organizations (pp. 47–64). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, T. T., & Cooper, T. L. (1997). Values in flux: Administrative ethics and the Hong Kong public servant. Administration & Society, 29(3), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, I., & Androniceanu, A. (2003). Chapter 6. Modern elements in public management. In O. Nicolescu, I. Plumb, M. Pricop, I. Vasilescu, & I. Verboncu (Eds.), Modern approaches in the organization management and economics. Bucharest: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, K., & Tuetteman, E. (1996). Reducing teacher stress: The effect of support in the work environment. Research in Education, 56, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RaudeliÅ«nienÄ—, J., & MeidutÄ—-KavaliauskienÄ—, I. (2014). Analysis of factors motivating human resources in public sector. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 719–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staats, E. B. (1988). Public service and public interest. Public Administration Review, 48, 601–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tat-Kei Ho, A. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the E-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2016). Strategy 2020: Empowered citizens, an accountable Europe [pdf]. Transparency International. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://transparency.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/04-09-2016-Strategy-2020-web.pdf

  • Turner, M. (2013). Summary report of public sector governance evaluation; a study commissioned by the department for international development [pdf]. Department for International Development. Retrieved March 15, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/199777/Public-sector-gov-reform-eval-summary.pdf

  • Vedinas, V. (2009). The statute of civil servants. Comments, doctrine, legislation, case law. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedinas, V. (2017). Administrative law (10th ed.). Bucharest: Universul Juridic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance: An empirical examination of two competing models. Personnel Review, 36(5), 661–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. J., & Blandin, J. S. (2006). Evaluating executive performance in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 7(1), 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financed by the Programme P1—The Development of the National System of Research and Development of the National Plan for Research, Development and Innovation (PN III), funded by the Ministry of Research and—Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (MESR—UEFISCDI), Contract no. 409/15.12.2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mirica, S.C., Moga, L.M., Dediu, B.I. (2019). Evaluation System for the Public Institutions Employees. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 11/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18565-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics