Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to present a coherent theoretical conceptualization of the ways in which learning designs organized as ‘learning through practice’ can prepare students for future professional practice as well as facilitate different patterns of engagement and knowledge transformation. Three prototypical learning designs are analysed: (1) case-based learning, (2) design-based learning and (3) simulation-based learning. Networked learning is understood as learners’ connecting of contexts in which they participate and as their resituation of knowledge, perspectives and ways of acting across these contexts. Learning designs of ‘learning through practice’ are distinguished by engaging practices outside the formal educational system as ways of developing curricular understanding and, reciprocally, as providing grounds for concretization of curricular content through its enactment in practice. By viewing these learning designs as networked learning, the intention is to highlight their potential for supporting certain connection forms between learners’ experiences in target practice and educational practice. The chapter argues that case-based learning establishes a relationship of inquiry between learner and target practice. The relationship established in design-based learning is one of innovation with the aim to support learners in developing understanding of practice through changing it. Finally, in simulation-based learning, relationships of imitation of target practice and engagement in ‘as-if’ practice are established.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barab, S. (2014). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Grohn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. Internet Environments for Science Education, 2004, 73–85.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world (Vol. 4). London: Springer.
Dilthey, W. (1927). Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften (Vol. 7). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dohn, N. B. (2007). ‘Praksis’, ‘social praksis’ eller ‘socialt medieret praksis’? Res Cogitans, 4(1), 193–211.
Dohn, N. B. (2014). Implications for networked learning of the ‘practice’ side of social practice theories – A tacit-knowledge perspective. In V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning (pp. 29–49). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Dohn, N. B. (2018). Conclusion: Designing for learning in a networked world. In N. B. Dohn (Ed.), Designing for learning in a networked world (pp. 273–286). Oxon: Routledge.
Dohn, N. B., & Hansen, J. J. (2018). Design in educational research - clarifying conceptions and presuppositions. In N. B. Dohn (Ed.), Designing for learning in a networked world (pp. 25–47). Oxon: Routledge.
Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. A. (2014). Online case-based discussions: Examining coverage of the afforded problem space. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 617–636.
Gadamer, H. G. (1990). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen, Germany: J.C.B. Mohr.
Geertz, C. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Readings in the philosophy of social science (pp. 213–231). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 45–85). London: Routledge.
Grierson, L. E. M. (2014). Information processing, specificity of practice, and the transfer of learning: Considerations for reconsidering fidelity. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(2), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9504-x
Hamstra, S. J., Brydges, R., Hatala, R., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Reconsidering fidelity in Simulation-based training. Academic Medicine, 89(3), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130
Hansen, J. J., & Dohn, N. B. (2018). Analysing learning designs of ‘learning through practice’ as networked learning. In M. Bajic, N. B. Dohn, M. de Laat, P. Jandric, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on networked learning (pp. 447–454). Lancaster, England: Lancaster University.
Hansen, J. J., & Remvig, K. (2016). Online lektiehjælp–Udvikling af en vejledningsdidaktik med pædagogisk designforskning som metode. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 9(15), 1–31.
Hansen, S. B. (2018). Networked learning in a networked world. In N. B. Dohn (Ed.), Designing for learning in a networked world (pp. 48–63). Oxon: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65–77.
Jones, C., Ryberg, T., & de Laat, M. (2017). Networked learning. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1553–1558). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Kantar, L. D., & Massouh, A. (2015). Case-based learning: What traditional curricula fail to teach. Nurse Education Today, 35(8), e8–e14.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for leaning and technology. New York: Routledge.
Lewin, K. (1973). Resolving social conflicts. Selected papers on group dynamics. London: Souvenir Press.
Mor, Y., Mellar, H., Warburton, S., & Winters, N. (Eds.). (2014). Practical design patterns for teaching and learning with technology. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Perseus Books.
Parchoma, G. (2018). Traces of cognition as a distributed phenomenon in networked learning. In N. B. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, M. de Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked learning: Reflections and challenges (pp. 23–37). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Parchoma, G., & Deaver-Charles, K. (2018). Designing for networked learning in the third space. In M. Bajic, N. B. Dohn, M. De Laat, P. Jandric, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on networked learning (pp. 432–439). Lancaster, England: Lancaster University.
Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. Educational design research, 1(3), 52–66.
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (Vol. 9, pp. 5–15).
Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thick’ authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195.
Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2015). Simulation-based constructivist approach for education leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 972–988.
Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken: ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. Stockholm, Sweden: Prisma.
Tawfik, A. A., & Kolodner, J. L. (2016). Systematizing scaffolding for problem-based learning: A view from case-based reasoning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), 6.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Van Wynsberghe, R., & Khan, S. (2007). Redefining case study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2), 80–94.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
Wang, S.-K., Hsu, H.-Y., Reeves, T. C., & Coster, D. C. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Education, 79, 101–115.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yoo, M. S., & Park, H. R. (2015). Effects of case-based learning on communication skills, problem-solving ability, and learning motivation in nursing students. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17(2), 166–172.
Acknowledgements
A former, shorter version of this article was presented at the 11th International Networked Learning Conference in Zagreb, 14–16 May 2018, and was published in the proceedings, cf. Hansen and Dohn (2018). Research for the article was funded by Independent Research Fund Denmark, Grant No. DFF-4180-00062.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hansen, J.J., Dohn, N.B. (2019). Design Principles for Professional Networked Learning in ‘Learning Through Practice’ Designs. In: Littlejohn, A., Jaldemark, J., Vrieling-Teunter, E., Nijland, F. (eds) Networked Professional Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18030-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18030-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18029-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18030-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)