Skip to main content

Communities of Inquiry in Crisis Management Exercises

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Networked Professional Learning

Abstract

Employees working in diverse settings such as schools, shops and government organisations have to be prepared for crisis situations, for example, a school shooting, extreme weather flooding, a health pandemic and so on. In these situations, they have to deal with the unexpected which makes it difficult to anticipate what they need to learn and how. This chapter examines how employees learn to deal with crisis situations, specifically focusing on whether a crisis management exercise could contribute to the development of a community of inquiry (CoI). The CoI model is chosen as the underpinning theory because it is assumed that learning communities create awareness, trust and support knowledge sharing, which are necessary pre-conditions for collaboration in crisis management situations. The study uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative data to analyse a simulated crisis exercise. The first round of analysis evidences that the exercise does not contribute to the development of a learning community. Digging deeper into the data in a second round, the results show that the CoI model does not reflect the various types of learning communities that develop within a crisis management exercise, such as home communities, cohort communities, specialist communities and local working groups. A key recommendation is that the CoI model should be expanded to include these four community types. Four additional key concepts appear important for community development in crisis management exercises: adoption of the various group, considering important partnerships, value creation and visibility. The extended CoI model could help to plan, monitor and evaluate professional learning of learning communities in future crisis management exercises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, A., Carlström, E. D., Ahgren, B., & Berlin, J. M. (2014). Managing boundaries at the accident scene: A qualitative study of collaboration exercises. International Journal of Emergency Services, 3(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C., & van Munster, R. (2012). The securitization of catastrophic events: Trauma, enactment, and preparedness exercises. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 37(3), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, J., & Carlström, E. (2015). Collaboration exercises. What do they contribute?: A study of learning and usefulness. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., Kofman-Bos, C., & Overdijk, W. (2004). Crisis simulation: Exploring tomorrow’s vulnerabilities and threats. Simulation and Gaming, 34(3), 378–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borell, J., & Eriksson, K. (2013). Learning effectiveness of discussion-based crisis management exercises. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 5, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M. F. (2005). Networked learning. (Doctoral dissertation, Police Academy of the Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (2016). Thinking collaboratively: Learning in a community of inquiry. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, C., & Reynolds, R. (2005). Consensus, difference and ‘multiple communities’ in networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, M., & Öberg, L. M. (2015). Crisis training software and user needs: Research directions. Proceedings of 12th international conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM ‘15), Kristiansand, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öberg, L. M., & Nyström, C. A. (2016). Evaluation of the level of collaboration in a regional crisis exercise setting: The use of community of inquiry. Paper presented at Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS) 2016, Sweden, Ljungskile. Available online at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-29640

  • Ozturk, H. T., & Ozcinar, H. (2013). Learning in multiple communities from the perspective of knowledge capital. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 204–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. W. (2004). Disaster exercise outcomes for professional emergency personnel and citizen volunteers. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(2), 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramondt L., Chapman C., & Powell S. (Eds.) (2002). Talking heads report (short version). Available online at: http://rubble.heppell.net/talking_heads/media/shortTHreport.pdf. Retrieved January 1, 2018.

  • Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(10), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena-Maria Öberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Öberg, LM., Nyström, C.A., Littlejohn, A., Vrieling-Teunter, E. (2019). Communities of Inquiry in Crisis Management Exercises. In: Littlejohn, A., Jaldemark, J., Vrieling-Teunter, E., Nijland, F. (eds) Networked Professional Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18030-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18030-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18029-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18030-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics