Abstract
This Chapter analyzes the agenda-setting and policy formation processes of the Brazilian Disarmament Statute (2003) and the Uruguayan Responsible Firearm Ownership Law (2014) from a comparative perspective. The use of the comparative method provides an explanation on which specific elements of each case study account for the dissimilar outcomes. This, in turn, allows drawing generalizations that can inform other gun policy processes in Latin America. The findings are not just relevant for policy scholars analyzing gun policies in the region but also for policy advocates and policy-makers working on gun violence and control. At last, the comparative study is used to evaluate the suitability of the MSF and its theoretical modifications to explain agenda and policy changes in the region. Based on this evaluation, the chapter ends with a discussion over the possibility that interest groups play an enhanced role in Latin American politics and over then implications that this might have for policy studies in the region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agg, Catherine. 2006. “Trends in Government Support for Non-Governmental Organizations: Is the ‘Golden Age’ of the NGO Behind Us?” In Civil Society and Social Movements. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).
Álvarez-Rivadulla, María José. 2015. “Squatters and Politics in Montevideo at the Turn of the Century.” In Handbook of Social Movements Across Latin America, edited by Paul Almeida and Allen Cordero Ulate, 205–20. Dordrecht: Springer.
Álvarez Velasco, Carla. 2016. “Armas Pequeñas y Países Pequeños: Armas de Fuego En La Agenda de Seguridad Internacional.” Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 55: 139–59.
Arce, Moisés. 2010. “Parties and Social Protest in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era.” Party Politics 16 (5): 669–86.
Baqueiro, Alberto Hernández. 2016. “The Participation of Civil Society Organizations in Public Policies in Latin America.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 27 (1): 86–104.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Béland, Daniel, and Michael Howlett. 2016. “The Role and Impact of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 18 (3): 221–27.
Bentancur, Nicolás, and José Miguel Busquets. 2019. “La Izquierda Gobernante En Uruguay (2005–2015). Análisis de Un Experimento Democrático Participativo.” Latin American Perspectives 46 (1): 137–51.
Bergara, Mario, Andrés Pereyra, Ruben Tansini, Adolfo Garcé, Daniel Chasquetti, Daniel Buquet, and Juan Andrés Moraes. 2006. “Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes: The Case of Uruguay.” Research Network Working Papers #R-510. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Bidegain, Germán. 2017. “From Cooperation to Confrontation: The Mapuche Movement and Its Political Impact, 1990–2014.” In Social Movements in Chile: Organization, Trajectories, and Political Consequences, edited by Sofia Donoso and Marisa von Bülow, 99–129. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brasil, Felipe Gonçalves, and Ana Cláudia Niedhardt Capella. 2017. “Translating Ideas into Action: Brazilian Studies of the Role of the Policy Entrepreneur in the Public Policy Process.” Policy and Society 36 (4): 504–22.
Caetano, Gerardo, and Jose P. Rilla. 1992. “Raíces y Permanencias de La Partidocracia Uruguaya.” Secuencia 22: 143–72.
Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39.
Chasquetti, Daniel, and Daniel Buquet. 2004. “La Democracia En Uruguay: Una Partidocracia de Consenso.” Política 42 (Otoño): 221–47.
Chen, Linda. 2018. “Corporatism Reconsidered: Howard J. Wiarda’s Legacy.” Polity 50 (4): 601–11.
Collier, David. 1995. “Trajectory of a Concept: ‘Corporatism’ in the Study of Latin American Politics.” In Latin American Comparative Perspective, edited by Peter H. Smith, 135–62. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
DerGhougassian, Khatchik. 2011. “Las Armas Livianas En La Agenda Internacional y El Excepcionalismo Americano: Estados Unidos y América Latina En La Perspectiva Conceptual de La Seguritización.” Urvio, Revista Latinoamericana de Seguridad Ciudadana 10: 23–35.
Dür, Andreas. 2008. “Interest Groups in the European Union: How Powerful Are They?” West European Politics 31 (6): 1212–30.
Eissler, Rebecca, Annelise Russell, and Bryan D. Jones. 2014. “New Avenues for the Study of Agenda Setting.” Policy Studies Journal 42 (S1): 71–86.
Gamboa, Ricardo, Carolina Segovia, and Octavio Avendaño. 2016. “Interest Groups and Policymaking: Evidence from Chile, 2006–2014.” Interest Groups and Advocacy 5 (2): 141–64.
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Goss, Kristin A. 2006. Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greenwood, J., J. R. Grote, and K. Ronit, eds. 1992. Organized Interests and the European Community. London: Sage.
Gupta, Kuhika. 2012. “Comparative Public Policy: Using the Comparative Method to Advance Our Understanding of the Policy Process.” The Policy Studies Journal 40 (1): 11–26.
Hagopian, Frances, Carlos Gervasoni, and Juan Andres Moraes. 2009. “From Patronage to Program: The Emergence of Party-Oriented Legislators in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (3): 360–91.
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Elisabeth Jay Friedman. 2008. “Can Civil Society Organizations Solve the Crisis of Partisan Representation in Latin America?” Latin American Politics and Society 50 (2): 1–32.
Johnson, Diane E. 2008. “Continuity and Change in Argentine Interest Group Activity and Lobbying Practices.” Journal of Public Affairs 8: 83–97.
Jones, Mark P. 2010. “Beyond the Electoral Connection: The Effect of Political Parties on the Policymaking.” In How Democracy Works: Political Institutions, Actors, and Arenas in Latin American Policymaking, edited by Carlos Scartascini, Ernesto Stein, and Mariano Tomassi, 19–46. Cambridge, MA: Inter-American Development Bank and David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
Jordan, Grant, Darren Halpin, and William Maloney. 2004. “Defining Interests: Disambiguation and the Need for New Distinctions?” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (2): 195–212.
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.
Klimovich, Kristina, and Clive S. Thomas. 2014. “Power Groups, Interests and Interest Groups in Consolidated and Transitional Democracies: Comparing Uruguay and Costa Rica with Paraguay and Haiti.” Journal of Public Affairs 14 (3): 183–211.
Kline, Harvey F., and Christine J. Wade. 2018. “The Latin American Tradition and Process of Development.” In Latin American Politics and Development, 9th ed., edited by Harvey F. Kline, J. Wade, Christine, and Howard J. Wiarda, New York: Routledge.
Knaggård, Åsa. 2016. “Framing the Problem: Knowledge-Brokers in the Multiple-Streams Framework.” In Decision-Making Under Ambiguity and Time Constraints: Assessing the Multiple-Streams Framework, edited by Reimut Zohlnhöfer and Friedbert W. Rüb, 111–23. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
LAPOP. 2014. The Political Culture of Democracy in the Americas, 2014: Democratic Governance Across 10 Years of the Americas Barometer. Nashville: USAID and Vanderbilt University.
Lodge, Martin. 2007. “Comparative Public Policy.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited by F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, and M. S. Sidney, 273–88. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Mainwaring, Scott. 2018a. “Party System Institutionalization, Predictability, and Democracy.” In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, edited by Scott Mainwaring, 71–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2018b. “Party System Institutionalization in Contemporary Latin America.” In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, edited by Scott Mainwaring, 34–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mendizabal, Enrique, and Norma Correa Aste, eds. 2011. Vínculos Entre Conocimiento y Política: El Rol de La Investigación En El Debate Público En América Latina. Diagnóstico y Propuesta. Lima: Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social (CIES), Universidad del Pacífico.
Moreira, Carlos. 2011. “Movimientos Populares y Luchas Sociales En Uruguay.” In Una Década En Movimiento: Luchas Populares En América Latina En El Amanecer Del Siglo XXI, edited by Massimo Modonesi and Julián Rebón, 107–23. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
O’Donnell, Guillermo A. 1977. “Corporatism and the Question of the State.” In Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, edited by James Malloy, 47–88. Boulder, CO: Westview.
———. 1993. “Delegative Democracy?” (April). Kellogg Institute Working Paper No. 192. https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/172_0.pdf.
Oliveira Gozetto, Andréa Cristina, and Clive S. Thomas. 2014. “Interest Groups in Brazil: A New Era and Its Challenges.” Journal of Public Affairs 14 (3–4): 212–39.
———. 2017. “Public Affairs in Latin America: The Gradual and Uneven Formalization of a Long-Time Informal Activity.” In The SAGE Handbook of International Corporate and Public Affairs, edited by Phil Harris and Craig S. Fleisher, 405–21. London: Sage.
Randall, Vicky, and Lars Svåsand. 2002. “Introduction: The Contribution of Parties to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation.” Democratization 9 (3): 1–10.
Rosenberg, Jonathan. 2004. “Entry 12.10: Latin America.” In Research Guide to U.S. and International Interest Groups, edited by Clive S. Thomas, 338–39. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Rozbicka, Patrycja, and Florian Spohr. 2016. “Interest Groups in Multiple Streams: Specifying Their Involvement in the Framework.” Policy Sciences 49 (1): 55–69.
Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Scartascini, Carlos. 2010. “Who’s Who in the PMP: An Overview of Actors, Incentives, and the Roles They Play.” In Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies, edited by Carlos Scartascini, Pablo Spiller, Ernesto Stein, and Mariano Tommasi, 29–65. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
Schlager, Edella. 2007. “A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories and Models of the Policy Process.” In Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed., edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 293–319. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” The Review of Politics 36 (1): 85–131.
Sousa Braga, Maria do Socorro, Pedro Floriano Ribeiro, and Oswaldo E. Do Amaral. 2016. “El Sistema de Partidos En Brasil: Estabilidad e Institucionalización (1982–2014).” In Los Sistemas de Partidos En América Latina 1978–2015: Cono Sur y Países Andinos - Tomo 2, edited by Flavia Freidenberg, 69–133. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Thomas, Clive S., and Kristina Klimovich. 2014. “Power Groups, Interests and Interest Groups in Latin America: A New Era or More of the Same?” Journal of Public Affairs 14 (3): 392–422.
———. 2017. “Three Case Studies from Latin America: A Living Museum of Government Affairs.” In The SAGE Handbook of International Corporate and Public Affairs, edited by Phil Harris and Craig S. Fleisher, 585–600. London: Sage.
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred Knopf.
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). n.d. “UNODC Statistics Online: Intentional Homicide Victims.” Accessed November 1, 2018. https://dataunodc.un.org/crime/intentional-homicide-victims.
Wiarda, Howard J. 1999. “Toward Consensus in Interpreting Latin American Politics: Developmentalism, Dependency, and ‘The Latin American Tradition.’” Studies in Comparative International Development 34 (2): 50–69.
Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2015. “The Shield of Heracles: Multiple Streams and the Emotional Endowment Effect.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (3): 466–81.
Zahariadis, Nikolaos, and Christopher S. Allen. 1995. “Ideas, Networks, and Policy Streams: Privatization in Britain and Germany.” Review of Policy Research 14 (1–2): 71–98.
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, and Friedbert W. Rüb. 2016. “Introduction: Policy-Making Under Ambiguity and Time Constraints.” In Decision-Making Under Ambiguity and Time Constraints: Assessing the Multiple-Streams Framework, edited by Reimut Zohlnhöfer and Friedbert W. Rüb, 2–17. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sanjurjo, D. (2020). Gun Policy Processes and Interest Group Politics in Latin America. In: Gun Control Policies in Latin America . International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17917-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17917-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17916-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17917-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)