Skip to main content

Improvisation and/or Music Education: A Child’s Upsetting Clarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Educational endeavours that have sought to bring the aura of creativity in music education are often characterised by an intimacy and a fragility that render them utterly powerless in the face of unexamined convictions, prejudices, impositions, exclusionary practices, and acts of intimidation that prevail in music education—acts of oppression and exertion of symbolic violence whose story is yet to be written, despite recent developments in that direction. In this chapter I will try to ponder over the notion of symbolic violence as a central feature of beginning to learn a musical instrument. Thus I will try to sketch a ‘topical’ notion of symbolic violence, denoting the ways in which teachers impose particular musical practices through induction into learning practices that reproduce musical values that are misrecognised as ‘self-evident’ and ‘natural’, while refusing to engage with their students’ meaning making processes, thus closing the door to alternative readings of their students’ creativity. Further I will offer an untidy reading of a young child’s practice of improvisation showing how children’s complex ‘innocence’ might create a window through which symbolic violence can be exposed, worked upon, and resisted. The chapter focuses on how a 6-year-old girl (Leoni) comes into improvisation and how her practice of improvisation is re-appropriated on the basis of her experience with formal instrumental tuition. I experiment with the possibility of offering a quasi-literary representation of a spontaneous piano improvisation created by Leoni in a home setting, and of the discussion on her music that followed. I then use a long discussion on improvisation I had with her 5 months later—it is between those two meetings that she had begun taking piano lessons, lessons that are seen as materialising a process of symbolic violence. Lastly, I comment on two short improvisations recorded a few days after this last discussion. Resisting oversimplification and reductionist/cognitivist perspectives I try to suggest a poetic, reflective and untidy approach to how we listen to children’s subaltern practice of improvising. I also try to show how children’s creative agency forges a trajectory that is always mediated by culturally framed constraints, yet opens up possibilities for re-appropriation and hence of resistance, through its potential to offer a holistic experience of musical flow, an experience that may not be a priori understood as antithetical or antagonistic to more formal aspects of music training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allsup, R. E. (2013). The compositional turn in music education: From closed forms to open texts. In M. Kaschub & J. Smith (Eds.), Composing our future: Preparing music educators to teach composition (pp. 57–74). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, D. (2002). Art in education: Identity and practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, N. H., & Hallam, S. (2002). Practice. In R. Parncutt & G. E. McPherson (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 151–165). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, C., Schmidt, P., Spruce, G., & Woodford, P. (2015). The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, K. (1992). Prologue: Disciplining music. In K. Bergeron & P. V. Bohlman (Eds.), Disciplining music: Musicology and its canons (pp. 1–9). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford, T. (2012). Tinkering and tethering in the material culture of children’s MP3 players. In P. S. Campbell & T. Wiggins (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of children’s musical cultures (pp. 527–542). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2011). Learner, student, speaker: Why it matters how we call those we teach. In M. Simons & J. Masschellein (Eds.), Ranciére, public education and the taming of democracy (pp. 31–42). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture (2nd ed.) (R. Nice, Trans.). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2011). Deconstructing neoliberal childhood: Towards a feminist antipsychological approach. Childhood, 19(4), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burwell, K. (2012). Studio-based instrumental learning. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cixous, H. (1986). The newly-born woman (Betsy Wing, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. T. (2015). A politics of becoming: When ‘child’ is not enough. Childhood, 22(1), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, I. (2010). Music and evolution: Consequences and causes. Contemporary Music Review, 22(3), 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, B. (2011). Creativity, creative class, smart power, social reproduction and symbolic violence. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 90–98). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake, E. (1988). What is art for? Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, K. (2017). Developing creativity and imagination by accumulating lots of useless knowledge. In J. B. Cummings & M. L. Blatherwick (Eds.), Creative dimensions of teaching and learning in the 21st century (pp. 37–45). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Emberly, A., & Davhula, L. A. (2016). My music, my voice: Musicality, culture and childhood in Vhavenda communities. Childhood, 23(3), 438–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L. (2001). Educating flexible souls. In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.), Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119–142). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferm-Almqvist, C., Benedict, C., & Kanellopoulos, P. A. (2017). Pedagogical encounters in music: Thinking with Hannah Arendt. European Journal of Philosophy in Arts Education, 2(1), 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality- volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias. In N. Leach (Ed.), Rethinking architecture: A reader in cultural theory (pp. 330–336). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraying, C. (2017). On craftsmanship. London, UK: Oberon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt, H. (2008). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36(2), 215–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goehr, L. (1992). The imaginary museum of musical works: An essay in the philosophy of music. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, E. (2008). Devouring the other: Democracy in music education. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 7(1), 29–44. http://act.maydaygroup.org/articles/Gould7_1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (1988). Music on deaf ears. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M., Hood, S., Barrett, B. D., & Schubert, D. (2017). Towards a realist sociology of education: A polyphonic review essay. Educational Theory, 67(2), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutting, G. (2005). Foucault: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, S. (2012). Why your five-year-old could not have done that: Modern art explained. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2011). Capitalism, creativity and learning: Some chapters in a relationship. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 15–26). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanellopoulos, P.A. (2000). Children’s understandings of their musical improvisations. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Reading, UK: University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanellopoulos, P. A. (2010). Towards a sociological perspective on researching children’s creative music making practices: An exercise in self-consciousness. In R. W. Wright (Ed.), Sociology and music education (pp. 115–138). London, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanellopoulos, P. A. (2015). Musical creativity and ‘the police’: Troubling core music education certainties. In C. Benedict, P. Schmidt, G. Spruce, & P. Woodford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 318–339). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanellopoulos, P. A. (2016). Problematizing knowledge–power relationships: A Rancièrian provocation for music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 24(1), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanellopoulos, P. A., & Nakou, I. (2015). Experimenting with sound, playing with culture: Collaborative composing as a means for creative engagement with the museum world. MuseumEdu: Education and Research in Cultural Environments, 1, 135–160. Available at: http://museumedulab.ece.uth.gr/main/en/node/34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanellopoulos, P. A., & Stefanou, D. (2015). Music beyond monuments: Re-imagining creative music engagement in the light of museum-based projects. MuseumEdu: Education and Research in Cultural Environments, 1, 37–64. Available at: http://museumedulab.ece.uth.gr/main/en/node/343

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooistra, L. (2016). Informal music education: The nature of a young child’s engagement in an individual piano lesson setting. Research Studies in Music Education, 38(1), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlovsky, R. (2006, April 1). The junk playground: Creative destruction as antidote to delinquency. Paper presented at the Threat and Youth Conference, Teachers College. Available at: http://threatnyouth.pbworks.com/f/Junk%20Playgrounds-Roy%20Kozlovsky.pdf

  • Kurtág, G. (n.d.). Játékok – games for piano, I–VIII. Budapest, Hungary: Editio Musica, 1979–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2011). Critique and experience in Foucault. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(4), 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, B. (2006). Foucault’s museum: Difference, representation, and genealogy. Museum and Society, 4(1), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, C. (2011). Making Payton’s rocket: Heterotopia and lines of flight. International Journal of Art and Design in Education, 30(1), 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2015). Beyond toleration: Facing the other. In C. Benedict, P. Schmidt, G. Spruce, & P. Woodford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 238–249). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. (2009). Re-thinking ‘music’ in the context of education. In T. A. Regelski & J. T. Gates (Eds.), Music education for changing times: Guiding visions for practice (pp. 29–38). London, UK: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (2002). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, E. A. (2011). Finding the muse: Teaching musical expression to adolescents in the one-to-one studio environment. International Journal of Music Education, 29(4), 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (2008). Capital. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 101–117). Stocksfield, UK: Acumen.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muhonen, S. (2016). Songcrafting practice: A teacher inquiry into the potential to support collaborative creation and creative agency within school music education (Studia Musica 67). Helsinki, Finland: Sibelius Academy, University of the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. (2006). Foucault, educational research and the issue of autonomy. In P. Smeyers & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Postfoundationalist themes in the philosophy of education: Festchrift for James D. Marshsall (pp. 57–79). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, L. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsonage, C., Frost-Fadnes, P., & Taylor, J. (2007). Integrating theory and practice in conservatoires: Formulating holistic models for teaching and learning improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 24(3), 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunig, G. (2013). Factories of knowledge, industries of creativity. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, F., & Biasutti, M. (2010). Strategies students adopted when learning to play an improvised blues in an e-learning environment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, M. (2011). Play in early childhood: From birth to six years (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (2018). Unthinking mastery: Dehumanism and decolonial entanglements. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanou, D. (2007, July 5–8). Borders, crossings and the imaginary geographies of improvisation. Paper presented at the panel Improvised Boundaries from the Balkans to the Caucasus, International Conference on Music Since 1900, York, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. M. (2015). Prosthetic imaginings and pedagogies of early childhood art. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(6), 554–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, G. (2007). Monumental musicology: The Oxford history of Western music by Richard Taruskin. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 132(2), 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topper, K. (2001). Bourdieu and symbolic violence. Constellations, 8(1), 30–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. (2011). Vulnerability and agency in being and becoming a musician. Music Education Research, 13(4), 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (2007). Art, visual culture, and child/adult collaborative images: Recognizing the other-than. Visual Arts Research, 33(2), 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2015). Music education and social reproduction: Breaking cycles of injustice. In C. Benedict, P. Schmidt, G. Spruce, & P. Woodford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 340–356). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (1995). Listening to the music of early childhood. British Journal of Music Education, 12(1), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (2016). Early childhood music education research: An overview. Research Studies in Music Education, 38(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., & Gillen, J. (2007). Toward a revised understanding of young children’s musical cctivities: Reflections from the ‘Day in the Life’ project. Current Musicology, 84, 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A big thank you: to Leoni for allowing me to closely look upon her musical doings. To Ruth W. Wright for her critical observations regarding the work of Bourdieu. To Susan Young and Beatriz Ilari for their meticulous and wonderfully dialogic editorial care. To Niki Barahanou for allowing me to share and test with her the arguments presented here as they evolved and to Manos Gerebakanis for his assistance in transcribing and editing the two scores.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kanellopoulos, P.A. (2019). Improvisation and/or Music Education: A Child’s Upsetting Clarity. In: Young, S., Ilari, B. (eds) Music in Early Childhood: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives and Inter-disciplinary Exchanges. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17791-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17791-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17790-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17791-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics