Abstract
This chapter examines how the Internet and visual art may co-produce particular liberating spaces. Both arenas are attributed great political hopes in their capacities to bring unjust hegemonies to the fore, and to mobilize critical reflexivity and dialogue. However, sociological observations of the deep entanglement of art with hegemonies of convention raise the question of how free the freeing forces of the synergy between visual art and the Internet are. Interviews with visual artists from the Danish net art group Artnode explore their resilient hopefulness for the synergy between visual art and the Internet, and how realities have consolidated in both disappointments and accomplishments over three decades of artistic experimentation. From these experiences, the art-Internet synergy is exemplified in terms of its transformative and antagonist liberating capacities. As a transformative space, the Internet potentially offers an innovative space for experimentation, but because it is mobilized as an oppositional space parallel to the established art world, it becomes insulated and the price is lack of recognition. Antagonist capacities of the art-Internet synergy refer to socially engaging criticism. The Internet may enable reflexivity, but given challenges, but this must be specifically designed for and cultivated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Alacovska, A. (2018). Keep hoping, keep going: Towards a hopeful sociology of creative work. The Sociological Review, 1(19).
Baumgärtel, T. (2008/1999). Netkunst. Historisk rids over det kunstneriske arbejde med telekommunikationsmidler. In J. Lillemose & N. Recke (Eds.), Vi elsker din computer. En antology om netkunst redigeret af Artnode. Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademis Billedkunstskoler (Originally published in English in 1999 with the title: Net art. On the history of artistic work with telecommunication. In T. Druckrey & P. Weibel (Eds.), Net condition: Art and global media. Cambridge: MIT Press).
Becker, H. S. (1974). Art as collective action. American Sociological Review,39(6), 767–776.
Becker, H. S. (2008/1982). Art worlds. 25th anniversary edition published by the University of California Press (Originally published in 1982 by The Regents of the University of California).
Bengtsen, P. (2013). Beyond the public art machine: A critical examination of street art as public art. Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History,82(2), 63–80.
Benjamin, W. (1936). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.) & H. Zohn (Trans.), Illuminations: Essays and Reflections (pp. 217–252). New York: Schocken.
Berry, J. (2008/2001). Re-materialiseringen—blot en gentagelse? In J. Lillemose & N. Recke (Eds.), Vi elsker din computer. En antology om netkunst redigeret af Artnode. Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademis Billedkunstskoler (Originally published in English in 2001 with the title: Re-dematerialisation of the object & the artist in biopower. Nettime, February 5).
Bourdieu, P. (1984a/1979). Distinction. London and New York: Routledge (Originally published in 1979 with the French title: La Distinction by Editions de Minuit).
Bourdieu, P. (1984b). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bradley, W., & Esche, C. (2007). Art and social change: A critical reader. London: Tate Publishings.
Darts, D. (2004). Visual culture jam: Art, pedagogy, and creative resistance. Studies in an Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 45(4) (2004), 313–327.
De La Fuente, E. (2007). The new sociology of art: Putting art back into social science approaches to the Arts. Cultural Sociology, 1(3), 409–425.
Deleuze, G. (1992/1988). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press (Originally published in French in 1988 with the title: Le Pli: Leibnitz et le Baroque by Les Éditions De Minuit).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1972). Anti-oedipus. Trans. R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane. London and New York: Continuum, 2004. Vol. 1 of Capitalism and Schizophrenia. 2 vols. 1972–1980. Trans. of L’Anti-Oedipe. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
Ekman, U. (Ed.). (2013). Throughout: Art and culture emerging with ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Ferdinand, P. (Ed.). (2000). The internet, democracy and democratization. Abingdon: Frank Cass Publishers.
Greaves, K. (2014). Hell-horse: Radical in Nazi-occupied Denmark. Oxford Art Journal,37(1), 47–63.
Greene, R. (2008/2000). Webarbejder: en historisk oversigt over Internetkunsten. In J. Lillemose & N. Recke (Eds.), Vi elsker din computer. En antology om netkunst redigeret af Artnode. Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademis Billedkunstskoler (Originally published in English in 2000 with the title: Web work: A history of internet art. Artforum).
Harvie, J. (2013). Fair play—Art, performance and neoliberalism. Performance Interventions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ilchuk, Y. (2017). Hearing the voice of Donbas: Art and literature as forms of cultural protest during war. Nationalities Papers,45(2), 256–273.
Katz, J. (1997). The digital citizen. Wired, pp. 68–82.
Katz, M. (2018, April 23). Augmented reality is transforming museums. The Wire, Culture.https://www.wired.com/story/augmented-reality-art-museums/.
Khaire, M. (2015). Art without borders? Online firms and the global art market. In O. Velthuis & S. B. Curioni (Eds.), Cosmopolitan canvases, the globalization of markets for contemporary art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kristensen, J. T. (2017, January 14). En note om Artnode. Idoart.dk.
Landgreen, M., Hinnum, S., & Olsen, S. K. (Eds.). (1997). Inserts. 67 kvindelige kunstnere i Danmark. Artnode Production.
Lievrouw, L. A. (2014). Materiality and media in communication and technology studies: An unfinished project. In T. Gillespie, et al. (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Lillemose, J., & Recke, N. (Eds.). (2008). Vi elsker din computer. En antology om netkunst redigeret af Artnode. Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademis Billedkunstskoler.
Lovejoy, M. (1997). Postmodern currents: Art and artists in the age of electronic media. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mouffe, C. (1991). Democratic citizenship and the political community. In The Miami Theory Collective (Ed.), Community at loose ends (pp. 70–82). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London and New York: Verso.
Mouffe C. (2007). Artistic activism and agonistic spaces. Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 1(2), 1–5.
Mouffe, C. (2008). Art and democracy: Art as an agnostic intervention in public space. Open 14. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers.
Mouffe, C., Deutsche, R., Joseph, B. W., & Keenan, T. (2001). Every form of art has a political dimension. Grey Room, 2(Winter), 98–125.
Neal, T. M. (1999, November 29). Satirical web site poses political test. Facing legal action from Bush, creator cites U.S. tradition of parody. Washington Post Staff Writer, p. A02.
Noveck, B. S. (2000). Paradoxical partners: Electronic communication and electronic democracy. In P. Ferdinand (Ed.), The Internet, democracy and democratization. Abingdon: Frank Cass Publishers.
Prior, N. (2011). Critique and renewal in the sociology of music, Bourdieu and beyond. Cultural Sociology,5(1), 121–138.
Sauvagnargues, A. (2013/2005). Deleuze and art. London: Bloomsbury Academic (Originally published in French with the title: Deleuze et l’art by Presses Univesritaires de France).
Schreiber, R. (2008/2001). Net.kunst: efter det utopiske øjeblik? In J. Lillemose & N. Recke (Eds.), Vi elsker din computer. En antology om netkunst redigeret af Artnode. Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademis Billedkunstskoler (Originally published in English in 2001 with the title: Net.Art: Shredding the Utopian moment. A Critical Journal of the Arts in Baltimore and the World, Issue 7).
Shanken, E. A. (2009). Art and electronic media. London: Phaidon Press Limited.
Shklovsky, V. (1988). Art as technique. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern critic is mandatory: A reader (pp. 15–30). New York and London: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hartmann, M.R.K. (2020). The Internet as Liberating Space for the Visual Arts: Political Hopes and Sociological Realities. In: Strandgaard Pedersen, J., Slavich, B., Khaire, M. (eds) Technology and Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17566-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17566-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17565-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17566-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)