Skip to main content

The Danger of Development Today: An Inevitable Polemic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Investigating Developmentalism

Abstract

The chapter explores the civilizational nexus of the discourse and practice of development. The Europeanization of the globe of which it is a part is located in a whole multiplicity of civilizational nexuses. The Indian civilizational nexus has its own distinctiveness to contribute. Adopting a forsaken idiom of polemic, this essay makes the critique of development relational, unraveling the interactive framework in which developmental discourse assumes predominance. Overall, this chapter becomes a springboard of thinking through the idea of development, in a manner unusual in development discourse of our times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauman, Z. (2011). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K. E. (2009). Comparisons of Histories: The Contribution of Henry Maine. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(2), 232–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. (1995). Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures). In J. Beverley, J. Oviedo, & M. Aronn (Eds.), The Postmodernism Debate in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2011). Civilization: The West and the Rest. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaviraj, S. (2017). Three Planes of Space. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(46), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. (2004). Post-development Theory and the Question of Alternatives: A View from Africa. Third World Quarterly., 25(2), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A., & Wallerstein, I. (1992). Americanity as a Concept, or the Americas in the Modern World-System. International Social Science Journal, 44(4), 549–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan, S. (1997). A Carnival for Science: Essays on Science, Technology and Development. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ray, R., Das, A.K. (2019). The Danger of Development Today: An Inevitable Polemic. In: Pathak, D., Das, A. (eds) Investigating Developmentalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17443-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17443-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17442-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17443-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics