Abstract
This paper aims to discuss how ethics has been addressed within the persuasive technology field and to explore whether ethics is generally applied in persuasive technology (PT) or simply recognized by academics as an important perspective. The paper is based on a literature review of the past 13 years of Persuasive Technology conference papers. The themes identified from the literature review are presented along with summaries of defining works within the field which have contributed to the discussion of ethics. This is followed by a discussion and reflection on the findings of the literature review. Finally, we conclude that ethics does matter but we argue that ethics has not been adequately addressed in the field of PT and that ethical considerations regarding the rights of the designers need to be researched.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
NVivo is software that supports qualitative and mixed methods research. It is designed to assist in organizing, analyzing and finding insights in unstructured, or qualitative data.
References
Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003)
Atkinson, B.M.C.: Captology: a critical review. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_25
Davis, J.: Design methods for ethical persuasive computing. In: Persuasive 2009, 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Paper 6, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2009)
IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E.: Persuasive technology for human well-being: setting the scene. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 1–5. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_1
Gasser, R., Brodbeck, D., Degen, M., Luthiger, J., Wyss, R., Reichlin, S.: Persuasiveness of a mobile lifestyle coaching application using social facilitation. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 27–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_5
Berdichevsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Commun. ACM 42, 51–58 (1999)
Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J., Fischer, R., Biddle, R.: Our place or mine? Exploration into collectivism-focused persuasive technology design. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_11
Laurel, B.: Meeting people where they are. In: Persuasive 2009, 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–2. ACM (2009)
Torning, K., Oinas-kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design : state of the art and future directions. In: Persuasive 2009, 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Cordura Hall, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2009)
Gram-hansen, S.B.: Persuasive designs for learning - learning in persuasive design: exploring the potential of persuasive designs in complex environments, p. 181. Aalborg Universitetsforlag (2016)
Karppinen, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Three approaches to ethical considerations in the design of behavior change support systems. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7822, pp. 87–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37157-8_12
Smids, J.: The voluntariness of persuasive technology. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 123–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11
Yetim, F.: A set of critical heuristics for value sensitive designers and users of persuasive systems. In: ECIS 2011 Proceedings, Helsinki (2011)
Spahn, A.: And lead us (not) into persuasion…? Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18, 1–18 (2011)
Gram-Hansen, S.B.: Towards an approach to ethics and HCI development based on Løgstrup’s ideas. In: Gross, T., et al. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5726, pp. 200–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_24
Kraut, R.: Aristotle’s Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2018)
Redström, J.: Persuasive design: fringes and foundations. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 112–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_17
Yurieff, K.: Your Facebook data scandal questions answered. CNN Business (2018)
n/a. Facebook’s Messenger Kids app accused of violating children’s privacy law. Business Standard (2018)
Associated Press: Facebook is accused of violating election law in Seattle. The Telegraph (2018)
Tynan, D.: Facebook accused of censorship after hundreds of US political pages purged. The Guardian (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kight, R., Gram-Hansen, S.B. (2019). Do Ethics Matter in Persuasive Technology?. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Win, K., Karapanos, E., Karppinen, P., Kyza, E. (eds) Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems. PERSUASIVE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17286-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17287-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)