Abstract
Borrowing from the philosophy of Kierkegaard, one way of understanding the apparent conflict between science and religion is to frame each as a discourse in terms of ‘about’ and ‘of’ languages that appeal to objective-explicit and subjective-tacit aspects of experience. About languages are discourses that are about something else, where science is nominally about nature, empirical events and objective descriptions, whereas religions are about doctrines, rituals, liturgies, institutional structures and so on. About languages are those things that can be stated propositionally, explicitly and objectively. In contrast, of languages refers to lived practices that are socio-historical. It is not just the doing of those practices but also the background conditions that contextualise them. This language is experienced tacitly and subjectively. Whilst we might be able to work from definitions by explicitly-objectively stating what science and religion are about, the tacit-subjective element eludes such reduction. Christianity, for example, may be about Jesus, Love and the Gospels, but we might be unsatisfied in saying that is all that Christianity is. Equally, we might be unsatisfied in claiming science is only about experimental verification, consensus building or falsification when history offers scientific counterexamples that fail to meet our definition. I argue that this unsatisfactory result is due to a metaphysical conflation of two discourses, which then create their own pseudo-problems, such as proving the existence of God as a route to the ‘Truth’ of religion or supplying a scientific basis for being ethical as a way of ‘disproving’ the religious experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alper, M. (2008). The god part of the brain: A scientific interpretation of human spirituality and god. Naperville: Sourcebooks.
Answers Research Journal: Building the Creation Model (2017). http://answersingenesis.org/answers/research-journal/. Accessed 12 Jan 2017.
Armstrong, K. (2005). A short history of myth. Edinburgh: Canongate.
Barbour, I. G. (2000). When science meets religion: Enemies, strangers, or partners. New York: Harper Collins.
Chalmers, A. F. (2010). What is this thing called science ? Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. London: Simon and Schuster.
Dirac, P. (1939). The relation between mathematics and physics. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 59(1938–1939), 122–129.
Dreyfus, H. (1979). What computers can’t do. New York: MIT Press.
Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method (3rd ed.). London: Verso.
Feynman, R. (2001). What is science? In J. Robbins (Ed.), The pleasure of finding things out: The best short works of Richard P. Feynman (pp. 171–188). London: Penguin Books.
Gordon, R. L. (2008). An introduction to Africana philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. London: Bantam Press.
Katz, E. C. (2001). The voice of god and the face of the other. The Journal of Textual Reasoning 2 (1). http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/journals/tr/volume2/number1/katz.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2016.
Katz, Y. (2012, November 1). Noam Chomsky on where artificial intelligence went wrong. The Atlantic.http://theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/noam-chomsky-on-where-artificalintelligence-went-wrong/261637/?single_page=true>. Accessed 19 Aug 2016.
Kierkegaard, S. (1941). Concluding unscientific postscript (Swenson, D. F. & Lowrie, W., Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (2006). Fear and trembling (S. Walsh, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Plantinga, A. (1983). Reason and belief in god. In A. Plantinga & N. Wolterstorff (Eds.), Faith and rationality: Reason and belief in god (pp. 16–94). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Polkinghorne, J. (1988). Science and creation: The search for understanding. London: SPCK.
Putnam, H. (2004). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sartre, J. (1984). Being and nothingness (Barnes, H. E., Trans.). New York: Washington Square Press.
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2007). A confusion of the spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on philosophy and religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smart, N. (1968). Secular education and the logic of religion. New York: Humanities Press.
Tallis, R. (2012). Aping mankind: Neuromania, dawinitis, and the misrepresentation of humanity. Durham: Acumen.
Tipler, F. J. (2007). The physics of christianity. London/New York: Doubleday.
Voegelin, E. (1948). The origins of scientism. Social Research, 15(4), 462–494.
Weinberg, S. (2001). Peace at last? In J. Labinger & H. Collins (Eds.), The one culture? A conversation about science (pp. 238–242). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (Pears, D. F., & McGuinness, B. F., Trans.). London: Routledge Classics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trubody, B. (2019). ‘About’ and ‘Of’ Languages: A New Way of Framing Religion and Science. In: Billingsley, B., Chappell, K., Reiss, M.J. (eds) Science and Religion in Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17233-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17234-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)