Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss the ethical issues that arise in both the practice and application of science. The place of these issues in the school curricula for science and RE (especially at Key Stage 4, ages 14–16) is examined. Focussing more specifically on bioethics, two ‘start-of-life’ case studies are presented. These are starting points for discussion of how ethical decisions are made in this area and the role of religion in the decision making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is not actually legally binding under international law but has been very widely adopted into national laws across the world.
- 2.
Played by the American actor, Jeff Goldblum.
- 3.
Detailed syllabuses in religious education are set by local education authorities usually with reference to the requirements of the relevant examination board(s).
- 4.
However, detailed discussion in biology may not occur until Key Stage 5.
- 5.
Exceptions are now allowed in respect of genome editing and mitochondrial donation. Details of these lie outside the scope of this chapter but may be found in Bryant and la Velle (2018).
- 6.
Details about cystic fibrosis may be found at https://www.cysticfibrosis.org.uk/what-is-cystic-fibrosis.
- 7.
The names are fictitious; this is a real case but the couple’s real names are not known
- 8.
These names are real.
- 9.
Details about Fanconi anaemia may be found here http://www.fanconi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/fa-fact-sheet-11-0713.pdf
- 10.
In the successful attempt, 14 embryos were created, of which several were healthy but could be used because of incompatibility with Molly
- 11.
- 12.
Interestingly though, he also writes of the need for moral enhancement.
References
AQA. (2017). GCSE specification: Religious studies B. http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-4055W-SP-14.PDF
Bruce, D. (2002). Finding a balance over precaution. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 7–16.
Bryant, J. (2012, January) Learning to play God. Third Way. Archived at https://thirdway.hymnsam.co.uk/editions/janfeb-2012/features/learning-to-play-god.aspx
Bryant, J. (2013). Beyond human? Oxford: Lion-Hudson.
Bryant, J. A., & la Velle, L. B. (2018). Introduction to bioethics (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bryant, J., & Searle, J. (2004). Life in our hands. Leicester: IVP.
Bunting, M. (2006, January 30). There is no stop button in the race for human re-engineering. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/comment/story/0,,1697702,00.html
Clarke, S., Savulescu, J., Coady, C. A. J., Giubilini, A., & Sanyal, S. (Eds.). (2016). The ethics of human enhancement: Understanding the debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deane-Drummond, C. (2005). Genetics and Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frey, R. (2002). Human use of non-human animals: A philosopher’s perspective. In J. Bryant, L. B. la Velle, & J. Searle (Eds.), Bioethics for scientists (pp. 101–112). Chichester: Wiley.
Goldacre, B. (2013). Bad pharma: How medicine is broken and how we can fix it. London: Fourth Estate/HarperCollins.
Harris, J. (2009, July 7). A world without men – that’s not the real issue here. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/john-harris-a-world-without-men-thats-notthe-real-ethical-issue-here-1736211.html
Haws, D. R. (2001). Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (mini) meta-analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 223–229.
Hays, R. B. (1996). The moral vision of the new testament. London: T & T Clark.
Leggett, M., & Robertson, S. (1996). Curriculum fragmentation impedes students’ understanding of technology and the environment. Journal of Education Policy, 11, 681–691.
Mayer, S. (2002). Questioning GM foods. In J. Bryant, L. B. la Velle, & J. Searle (Eds.), Bioethics for scientists (pp. 141–152). Chichester: Wiley.
On Common Ground. (2017). Are scientists playing God?http://oncommonground.net/events/week2/
Park, R. S. (2013). Fragmented knowledge structures: Secularization as Scientization. Heythrop Journal, 54, 563–573.
Reardon, S. (2015). Leukaemia success heralds wave of gene-editing therapies. Nature, 527, 146–147.
Resnik, D. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15, 413–426.
Southgate, C. (2002). Introduction to environmental ethics. In J. Bryant, L. B. la Velle, & J. Searle (Eds.), Bioethics for scientists (pp. 39–56). Chichester: Wiley.
Stacey-Chapman, A. (2015). From compartmentalised to a complicated past: Developing transferable knowledge at A-level. Teaching History, 158, 8–15.
Stock, G. (2003). Redesigning humans: Choosing our children’s genes. London: Profile Books.
Sutton, A. (2008). Christian bioethics: A guide for the perplexed. London: T & T Clark.
UK Department of Education. (2014). National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-scienceprogrammes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study
Warnock Committee. (1984). Report of the committee of inquiry into human fertilisation and embryology. London: UK Department of Health.
Wolpert, L. (1992). The unnatural nature of science. London: Faber and Faber.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bryant, J. (2019). Science, Ethics, Education and Religion: Connecting and Disconnecting. In: Billingsley, B., Chappell, K., Reiss, M.J. (eds) Science and Religion in Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17233-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17234-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)