Abstract
The identity of family firms is considered by the literature a unique source of competitive advantage in the realm of stakeholders relationship building and relationship marketing, mainly due to the positive perceptions stakeholders hold regarding this model of business (Astrachan and Astrachan, Family business branding: leveraging stakeholder trust. IFB research foundation report 1–43. IFB Research Foundation, London, 2015; Blombäck, Realizing the value of family business identity as corporate brand element—a research model, JIBS working papers. Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, 2011; Krappe et al., J Fam Bus Manag 1:37–46, 2011). Nevertheless, these positive perceptions need to be activated in the minds of stakeholders in order for them to be part of the decision-making process stakeholders go through and be utilized by them to favor family businesses. A critical step in this activation process is the communication of the family identity from the part of the family firms. Therefore, it is necessary that these businesses act intentionally towards communicating their identity in order to turn on the mental evaluation mechanism that takes into consideration the perceptions regarding the identity of the business which, according to the arguments in the literature has the potential to yield favorable results for family firms.
Although the literature emphasizes the importance of communicating the family identity (Carrigan and Buckley, Int J Cons Stud 32:656–666, 2008; Craig et al., J Small Bus Manag 46:351–371, 2008; Memili et al., J Fam Bus Strat 1:200–209, 2010) the evidences used are mainly conceptual in nature (Blombäck, Realizing the value of family business identity as corporate brand element—a research model, JIBS working papers. Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, 2011; Krappe et al., J Fam Bus Manag 1:37–46, 2011) and limited in their identification of actual practices taken by family firms to communicate their identity (Botero et al., J Fam Bus Strat 4:12–21, 2013).
Using the content analysis methodology this study reviews the websites of 365 family owned businesses in Romania and analyzes the approach taken by these businesses in regard to their family identity and the communication of this identity via the company’s official website.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Astrachan J, Astrachan CB. Family business branding: leveraging stakeholder trust. IFB research foundation report 1–43. London: IFB Research Foundation; 2015.
Bălan C. Dreptul consumatorului la informare înainte de cumpărare: Cercetări privind magazinele online româneşti de bunuri de consum tehnice. Amfiteatru Econ. 2014;16:366–82.
Balmer JM, Greyser SA. Managing the multiple identities of the corporation. Calif Manag Rev. 2002;44:72–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166133.
Binz C. Exploring the effect of distinct family firm reputation on consumers’ preferences. J Fam Bus Strat. 2013;4:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.12.004.
Blombäck A. Realizing the value of family business identity as corporate brand element – a research model, JIBS working papers. Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School; 2011.
Botero IC, Thomas J, Graves C, Fediuk TA. Understanding multiple family firm identities: an exploration of the communicated identity in official websites. J Fam Bus Strat. 2013;4:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.11.004.
Carrigan M, Buckley J. ‘What’s so special about family business?’ An exploratory study of UK and Irish consumer experiences of family businesses. Int J Consum Stud. 2008;32:656–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00696.x.
Craig JB, Dibrell C, Davis PS. Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. J Small Bus Manag. 2008;46:351–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00248.x.
Fischer E, Reuber AR. Family business review—special issue September 2011: marketing and family businesses. Fam Bus Rev. 2011;22:371–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509354694.
Fotea S, Echevarria S. Governance particularities of Romanian family business. In: Vaduva S, Fotea IS, Thomas AR, editors. Business ethics and leadership from an eastern European, transdisciplinary context: the 2014 Griffiths school of management annual conference on business, entrepreneurship and ethics. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45186-2_4.
Fotea S, Marici M, Fotea I, Văduva S. Customer-based reputation of family businesses in an emergent market. In: SGEM, international conference - 5th international multidisciplinary scientific conference on social sciences and arts SGEM 2018, vol. 5. p. 241–252.
Habbershon TG, Williams M, MacMillan IC. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. J Bus Ventur. 2003;18:451–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3.
Howorth C, Rose M, Hamilton E, Westhead P. Family firm diversity and development: an introduction. Int Small Bus J. 2010;28:437–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610373685.
INS. Întreprinderi mici s,i mijloci în economia românească-2017 (Raport Anual No. 47). Bucuresti: INS; 2017.
Kalm M, Gomez-Mejia LR. Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Rev Adm. 2016;51:409–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.08.002.
Keller KL. Strategic brand management: building, measuring, and managing brand equity. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012.
Krappe A, Goutas L, von Schlippe A. The “family business brand”: an enquiry into the construction of the image of family businesses. J Fam Bus Manag. 2011;1:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231111122272.
Memili E, Eddleston KA, Kellermanns FW, Zellweger TM, Barnett T. The critical path to family firm success through entrepreneurial risk taking and image. J Fam Bus Strat. 2010;1:200–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.10.005.
Micelotta ER, Raynard M. Concealing or revealing the family?: corporate brand identity strategies in family firms. Fam Bus Rev. 2011;24:197–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511407321.
Orth UR, Green MT. Consumer loyalty to family versus non-family business: the roles of store image, trust and satisfaction. J Retail Consum Serv. 2009;16:248–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.12.002.
Sundaramurthy C, Kreiner GE. Governing by managing identity boundaries: the case of family businesses. Entrep Theory Pract. 2008;32:415–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00234.x.
Szabo Z, Szabo KD. Family businesses in Romania. In: Family businesses and SMEs in the black sea economic cooperation region. Istanbul: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V; 2014. p. 7–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fotea, S., Pop, I.G., Fotea, I. (2019). Exploring the Identity of Family Businesses and Its Role in Stakeholder Relations in an Emerging Market. In: Văduva, S., Fotea, I., Văduva, L., Wilt, R. (eds) Applied Ethics for Entrepreneurial Success: Recommendations for the Developing World. GSMAC 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17215-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17215-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17214-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17215-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)