Skip to main content

An Efficient JPEG Steganalysis Model Based on Deep Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security with Intelligent Computing and Big-data Services (SICBS 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 895))

  • 1229 Accesses

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have gained an overwhelming advantage in many domains of pattern recognition. CNN’s excellent data learning ability and automatic feature extraction ability are urgently needed for image steganalysis research. However, the application of CNN in image steganalysis is still in its infancy, especially in the field of JPEG steganalysis. This paper presents an efficient CNN-based JPEG steganographic analysis model which is called JPEGCNN. According to the pixel neighborhood model, JPEGCNN calculates the pixel residual as a network input with a 3 × 3 kernel function. In this way, JPEGCNN not only solves the problem that direct analysis of DCT coefficients is greatly affected by image content, but also solves the problem that larger kernel functions such as 5 × 5 do not effectively capture neighborhood correlation changes. Compared with the JPEG steganographic analysis model HCNN proposed by the predecessors, JPEGCNN is a lightweight structure. The JPEGCNN training parameters are about 60,000, and the number of parameters is much lower than the number of parameters of the HCNN. At the same time of structural simplification, the simulation results show that JPEGCNN still maintains accuracy close to HCNN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pevný, T., Filler, T., Bas, P.: Using High-Dimensional Image Models to Perform Highly Undetectable Steganography. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holub, V., Fridrich, J.: Designing steganographic distortion using directional filters. In: IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), vol. 2, pp. 234–239 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2012.6412655

  3. Holub, V., Fridrich, J.: Digital image steganography using universal distortion. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security, Montpellier, 17–19 June 2013, pp. 59–68 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2482513.2482514

  4. Sedighi, V., Cogranne, R., Fridrich, J.: Content-adaptive steganography by minimizing statistical detectability. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 11, 221–234 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2015.2486744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, B., Wang, M., Li, X., Tan, S., Huang, J.: A strategy of clustering modification directions in spatial image steganography. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 10, 1905–1917 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2015.2434600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fridrich, J., et al.: Breaking HUGO—the process discovery. In: Information Hiding-international Conference, vol. 6958, pp. 85–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24178-9_7

  7. Jan, K., Fridrich, J.: Steganalysis in high dimensions: fusing classifiers built on random subspaces. In: Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 7880, pp. 181–197 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fridrich, J., Kodovsky, J.: Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 7, 868–882 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holub, V., Fridrich, J.: Random projections of residuals for digital image steganalysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 8, 1996–2006 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2013.2286682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qian, Y., Dong, J., Wang, W., Tan, T.: Deep learning for steganalysis via convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics 2015, pp. 94 090 J–1–94 090 J–10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pibre, L., Jérôme, P., Ienco, D., Chaumont, M.: Deep learning is a good steganalysis tool when embedding key is reused for different images, even if there is a cover source-mismatch. In: Proceedings of the Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics, Part of IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging (EI 2016), February 2016

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, G., Wu, H.Z., Shi, Y.Q.: Structural design of convolutional neural networks for steganalysis. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 23(5), 708–712 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ye, J., Ni, J., Yi, Y.: Deep learning hierarchical representations for image steganalysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 12(11), 2545–2557 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeng, J., Tan, S.: Large-scale JPEG steganalysis using hybrid deep-learning framework. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 13(5), 1200–1214 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holub, V., Fridrich, J.: Low-complexity features for JPEG steganalysis using undecimated DCT. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 10(2), 219–228 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holub, V., Fridrich, J.: Phase-aware projection model for steganalysis of JPEG images. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, Electronic Imaging, Media Watermarking, Security, and Forensics XVII, vol. 9409 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bas, P., Filler, T., Pevný, T.: Break our steganographic system: the ins and outs of organizing boss. In: Information Hiding, pp. 59–70. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holub, V., Fridrich, J., Denemark, T.: Universal distortion function for steganography in an arbitrary domain. EURASIP J. Inf. Secur. 2014(1), 1–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeiler, M.D.: ADADELTA: An adaptive learning rate method. https://arXiv:1212.5701 (2012)

  20. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Aistats, vol. 9, pp. 249–256 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFB0802703) and Open Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Public Big Data (No. 2018BDKFJJ014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Gan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gan, L., Cheng, Y., Yang, Y., Shen, L., Dong, Z. (2020). An Efficient JPEG Steganalysis Model Based on Deep Learning. In: Yang, CN., Peng, SL., Jain, L. (eds) Security with Intelligent Computing and Big-data Services. SICBS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16946-6_60

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics