Skip to main content

Theory-Based Multimodal Parenting Intervention for Incarcerated Parents and Their Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Children with Incarcerated Parents

Abstract

Parenting programs for incarcerated parents have become increasingly popular within corrections departments over the past several decades. The programs are appealing as they are thought to improve not only long-term prosocial outcomes and reductions in recidivism for parents who are reentering their communities after lockup, but also outcomes for their children. While some parenting programs have been shown to be effective in various ways, they may be insufficient to produce long-lasting, positive impacts for families with loved ones involved in the criminal justice system. We proposed that an expanded definition of what a parenting program is might be useful—a “multimodal” parenting program. Such programs address not only the development of parenting knowledge and the practice of parenting skills, but also the numerous contextual challenges that many correction-involved parents face during and following incarceration. Some of these challenges include inadequate housing, parent unemployment, parental mental and physical health issues, and conflictual personal relationships. We overview our work to build a multimodal parenting program for incarcerated parents and their families, and discuss the implication of such for future research, practice, and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, B., Sar, B., Christensen, D., Ellers, F., Barbee, A., & van Zyl, M. (2013). The impact of the Within My Reach relationship training on relationship skills and outcomes for low-income individuals. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 39(3), 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E., Eggins, E., Reid, N., Harnett, P., & Dawe, S. (2018). Parenting interventions for incarcerated parents to improve parenting knowledge and skills, parent well-being, and quality of the parent-child relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(3), 279–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brestan, E. V., & Eyberg, S. M. (1998). Effective psychosocial treatments of conduct-disordered children and adolescents: 29 years, 82 studies, and 5,272 kids. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, D. M., & Eddy, J. M. (2005). Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. In T. P. Gullotta & G. R. Adams (Eds.), The handbook of adolescent behavioral problems: Evidence-based approaches to prevention and treatment (pp. 283–308). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, D. M., Kerr, D. C. R., Eddy, J. M., & Tiberio, S. S. (2016). Understanding persistence and desistance in crime and risk behaviors in adulthood: Implications for theory and prevention. Prevention Science, 17, 785–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D., Todahl, J., & Barrett, W. C. (1999). Solution-based casework: An introduction to clinical and case management skills in casework practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M. J. (1993). Parenting in prison: A national survey of programs for incarcerated women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 19(1/2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., & Jacobs, M. R. (1993). The role of social context in the prevention of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisanti, A. S., Duran, D., Green, R. N., Reno, J., Luna-Anderson, C., & Altschul, D. B. (2017). A longitudinal analysis of peer-delivered permanent supportive housing: Impact of housing on mental and overall health in an ethnically diverse population. Psychological Services, 14(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (2000). Conduct disorder. In A. J. Sameroff, M. Lewis, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 447–463). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, R., & Kim, H. (2018). Evaluation of seven Second Chance Act adult demonstration programs: Impact findings at 30 months. Oakland, CA: Social Policy Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Snyder, J. (Eds.). (2016). The Oxford handbook of coercive relationship dynamics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., & Burraston, B. O. (2018). Programs promoting the successful reentry of fathers from jail or prison to home in their communities.In C. Wildeman, A. R. Haskins, & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds.), When parents are incarcerated: Interdisciplinary research and interventions to support children (pp. 109–132). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Kjellstrand, J. M., Harris, M., House-Higgins, C., Goff, D., & McElravy, T. (2018). Development of a multimodal, reentry-focused parenting intervention for fathers releasing from state prison. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Kjellstrand, J., Martinez, C. R., Jr., & Newton, R. (2010). Theory-based multimodal parenting intervention for incarcerated parents and their families. In J. M. Eddy & J. Poehlmann (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Kjellstrand, J. M., & Schumer, J. (2018). Outcomes related to a transitional housing program for men and women releasing from state prison. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C. R., Jr., & Burraston, B. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a parent management training program for incarcerated parents: Proximal impacts. In J. Poehlmann & J. M. Eddy (Eds.), Relationship processes and resilience in children with incarcerated parents (pp. 75–93). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(3), Serial No. 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Martinez, Jr., C. R., Burraston, B. O., Herrera, D., Wheeler, A., & Newton, R. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of a parent management training program for incarcerated parents: Outcomes following release from prison. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C. R., Jr., Schiffmann, T., Newton, R., Olin, L., Leve, L., et al. (2008). Development of a multisystemic parent management training intervention for incarcerated parents, their children and families. Clinical Psychologist, 12(3), 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Olin, L., & Newton, R. (2018). Support for parenting skill development following a parent management training program in prison: Therapeutic visitation. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., & Poehlmann, J. (Eds.). (2010). Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, L., Williams, T., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Eason, J. (2008). PREP Inside and Out: Marriage education for inmates. Family Process, 47, 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlacher, J. (2010). Walking the line: PREP’s curriculum for incarcerated men. Greenwood Village, CO: PREP Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgatch, M. S., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (1999). Parent management training: A program linking basic research and practical application. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 36, 923–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaes, G. G., & Kendig, N. (2003). The skill sets and health care needs of released offenders. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 105–156). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., & Ross, B. (1979). Effective correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime and Delinquency, 25(4), 463–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Parents in prison and their minor children (Special Report No. NCJ 222984). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondles, E. (March/April, 2018). Our most valuable asset: Correctional employees. Corrections Today, 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., & Stanley, S. M. (2008). Strengthening couples’ relationships with education: Social policy and public health perspectives. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Eddy, J. M. (Eds.). (2018). Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and promise. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., & Weis, J. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 6(2), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, J. M., Menghraj, S., & Hairston, C. F. (2001). Serving incarcerated and ex-offender fathers and their families: A review of the field. Washington, DC: Vera Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellam, S. G., & Rebok, G. W. (1992). Building developmental and etiological theory through epidemiologically based preventive intervention trials. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 162–195). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellstrand, J. M. (2018). Building a tailored, multilevel prevention strategy to support children and families affected by parental incarceration. In M. Harris & J. M. Eddy (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and promise (pp. 111–128). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klinoff, V. A., van Hasselt, V. B., Black, R. A., Masias, E. V., & Couwels, J. (2018). The assessment of resilience and burnout in correctional officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(8), 1213–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E. G., Hogan, J. L., Griffin, M. L., & Kelley, T. (2015). The correctional staff burnout literature. Criminal Justice Studies, 28(4), 397–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, H. J., Renick, M. J., Floyd, F., Stanley, S., & Clements, M. (1993). Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A four and five year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, D. B. (2006). When “What works” never did: Dodging the “Scarlet M” in correctional rehabilitation. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(2), 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, H. H., Shortt, J. W., Eddy, J. M., Holmes, A., Van Uum, S., Russell, E., et al. (2015). Mother-child contact and maternal hair cortisol and adjustment during and following incarceration. In J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Ed.), Children’s contact with incarcerated parents: Implications for policy and intervention (pp. 59–82). Steinhausen, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., Lipsenthal, L., & Arguelles, L. (2009). New hope for correctional officers: An innovative program for reducing stress and health risks. Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback, 34, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, C., Eddy, J. M., & Lichtenstein, D. (2013). Prevention aimed at individuals. In B. S. McCrady & E. E. Epstein (Eds.), Addictions: A comprehensive guidebook (pp. 839–870). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morash, M., Haarr, R. N., & Rucker, L. (1994). A comparison of programming for women and men in U.S. prisons in the 1980s. Crime & Delinquency, 40(2), 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castilia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. (1992). Antisocial boys. A social interaction approach (Vol. 4). Eugene, OR: Castalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. S. (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2004). What works in prisoner reentry? Reviewing and questioning the evidence. Federal Probation, 68(2), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center for the States. (2009). One in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Snyder, J. (2002). Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhine, E. E., Mawhorr, T. L., & Parks, E. C. (2006). Implementation: The bane of effective correctional programs. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(2), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rog, D. J., Marshall, T., Dougherty, R. H., George, P., Daniels, A. A., Ghose, S. S., et al. (2014). Permanent supportive housing: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65, 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. R., Clear, T. R., & Ryder, J. A. (2000). Drugs, incarceration, and neighborhood life: The impact of reintegrating offenders into the community. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffmann, T., Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C. R., Leve, L., Newton, R., & Burke, S. (2017). Parenting Inside Out: Parent management training for parents in prison (PIO Prison-90) (2nd ed.). Portland, OR: The Pathfinder Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiter, R. P., & Kadela, K. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49(3), 360–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortt, J Wu, Eddy, J. M., Sheeber, L., & Davis, B. (2014). Project Home: A pilot evaluation of an emotion-focused intervention for mothers reuniting with children after prison. Psychological Services, 11, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuford, J. A. (March/April, 2018). The missing link in reentry: Changing prison culture. Corrections Today, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. K., & Biglan, A. (1998). Behavioral family interventions for improving child-rearing: A review of the literature for clinicians and policy makers. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J., & Visher, C. A. (2005). Prisoner reentry and the pathways to adulthood: Policy perspectives. In D. W. Osgood, E. M. Foster, C. Flanagan, & G. R. Ruth (Eds.), On your own without a net: The transition to adulthood for vulnerable populations (pp. 145–177). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J., & Waul, M. (2003). Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, C., Haskins, A. R., & Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (Eds.). (2018). When parents are incarcerated: Interdisciplinary research and interventions to support children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. A., & Davis, R. (2006). Hard realities meet good intentions: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight Reentry Program. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(2), 303–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. X., Roberts, R. E. L., & Callanan, V. J. (2006). Preventing parolees from returning to prison through community-based reintegration. Crime & Delinquency, 52(4), 551–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Mark Eddy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eddy, J.M. et al. (2019). Theory-Based Multimodal Parenting Intervention for Incarcerated Parents and Their Children. In: Eddy, J., Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (eds) Handbook on Children with Incarcerated Parents. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16707-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics