Abstract
In this chapter, Borooah considers the distribution of job contracts—in terms of casual jobs, temporary jobs (i.e. those of less than a year’s duration), and permanent jobs—across different subgroups of the population. Although the analysis of this chapter echoes that of Chap. 3, which is cast in terms of regular salaried and wage employment and casual employment, the novelty of this chapter is twofold. First, it explicitly addresses the question of job tenure: while much of the regular salaried and wage employment discussed in Chap. 3 may have been permanent employment, some of it may not have been. Second, and more importantly, it addresses the issue of “desirable jobs” using a data set different from the National Sample Survey data used in the earlier chapter (i.e. unit record data from the Indian Human Development Survey relating to the period 2011–12). The Survey provides details about the job tenure of persons by distinguishing between three types of jobs: casual (daily or piecework), contracts of less than one-year duration, and permanent. The importance of the analysis contained in this chapter is that if one defines job insecurity as workers’ fear of involuntary job loss, job insecurity has negative consequences for employees’ attitudes towards their job, their health, and the quality of their relationship with their employers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Desai et al. (2015).
- 3.
Ninety-two per cent of casual jobs were paid on a daily basis, the remainder being paid by piecework.
- 4.
All the figures in this chapter were obtained by grossing up the sample observations using the weights in IHDS-2011 contained in its FWT variable.
- 5.
About 94% of persons in the FC category were Hindu, 4% were Christian, and 2% were Sikh.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Stata’s margin command performs these calculations.
- 9.
The equations were estimated using the svy command in Stata or, in other words, by grossing up the sample observations using weights in IHDS-2011 contained in its FWT variable.
- 10.
Though there was no difference between more and less developed villages in the SP of persons being in permanent jobs.
- 11.
See Chap. 3 for a more detailed discussion of this decomposition.
- 12.
See Hirschman (1964).
References
Bhambri, C. P. (2005). Reservations and Casteism. Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 806–808.
Bourguignon, F. (1979). Decomposable Income Inequality Measures. Econometrica, 47, 901–920.
Desai, S., Dubey, A., & Vanneman, R. (2015). India Human Development Survey-I. University of Maryland and National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job Insecurity: Towards Conceptual Clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 438–448.
Hartley, J., Jacobson, D., Klandermans, B., & van Vuuren, T. (1991). Job Insecurity: Coping with Jobs at Risk. London: Sage.
Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The Paternity of an Index. The American Economic Review, 54, 761–762.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
Macleod, W. B. (2010). Great Expectations: Law, Employment Contracts, and Labor Market Performance (Working Paper 16048). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
Sverke, M., & Hellgren, J. (2002). The Nature of Job Insecurity: Understanding Employment Insecurity on the Brink of a New Millennium. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 23–42.
Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Näswall, K. (2002). No Security: A Meta-analysis and Review of Job Insecurity and Its Consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 242–264.
Theil, H. (1967). Economics and Information Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Thimmaiah, G. (2005). Implications of Reservations in Private Sector. Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 745–749.
Thorat, S., Aryama, & Negi, P. (Eds.). (2005). Reservation and Private Sector: Quest for Equal Opportunity and Growth. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.
Thorat, S., Tagade, N., & Naik, A. K. (2016). Prejudice Against Reservation Policies: How and Why. Economic and Political Weekly, 51, 61–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix on Measures of Disproportionality
Appendix on Measures of Disproportionality
One of the issues central to this chapter is the degree to which permanent jobs were concentrated among certain social groups. In analysing this, this chapter made use of the Bourguignon-Theil index based on the natural logarithm of the arithmetic to the geometric mean (Theil 1967; Bourguignon 1979). Other methods for measuring disproportionality also exist.
A popular measure of concentration, used in the industrial economics literature to measure the degree of competition in a market, is the Hirschman-Herfindahl index (HHI).Footnote 12 Applied to the concentration of “desirable jobs”, the HHI for group j is represented by \( HH{I}^j \) and defined as:
where \( {v}^k \) is group k’s share in desirable jobs (k = 1…K). At one extreme, if group k has all the desirable jobs, then \( {v}^k=1 \) and \( HH{I}^j=1 \), which is the maximum value of the index. At the other extreme, if all the groups have an equal share of desirable jobs, \( HH{I}^j=1/K \) which is the minimum value of the index. Consequently, \( 1/K\le HH{I}^j\le 1 \).
Another index of disproportionality is Shannon’s (1948) entropy index defined as:
And another such index is the dissimilarity index defined as:
If a group’s share of desirable jobs equals 1 (meaning that group k gets all the desirable jobs) so that, say, \( {v}^1=1,{v}^2\dots ={v}^K=0 \), then E = 0, which is its minimum value, and D = K−1 which is its maximum value; on the other hand, if all the groups have equal shares in desirable jobs so that, \( {v}^1={v}^2=.\dots ={v}^2=1/K \), then \( E=\log \left(1/K\right) \) which is its maximum value and D = 0, which is its minimum value.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borooah, V.K. (2019). Job Contracts. In: Disparity and Discrimination in Labour Market Outcomes in India. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16264-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16264-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16263-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16264-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)