Skip to main content

Abstract

In medical science, Computed Tomography is one of the powerful tools to reconstruct 3D image with measuring stack of parallel slices, where Radon transform is useful to get image slices by set of line integrals. 3D reconstructed images are very helpful to analyze multiple abnormalities in comparison of 2D images. Only CT scanned images is not sufficient to get the exact position and surface information of patients. This paper is dealing with the problem of direct 3D-reconstruction of medical images. We examined 3D surface reconstruction over 2D-CT scanned image and also tested over the simulated image. Shape from shading (SFS) technique is useful to get the geometric information for recover features from variation of shading. In this paper, Fast Marching Method (FMM) is used to get the 3D surface over the medical images (i.e., real image and synthetic image).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J-B.Thibault, K. Sauer, C. Bouman, and J. Hsieh, “A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multi-slice helical CT,” in Journal on Med. Phys., vol. 34, pp. 4526–44, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. RenJingying and Chen Shuyue, “Research on interpolation methods for cross-sections slice image,”in Journal onComputer Measurement and Control, vol. 13, pp. 729-733, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Withayachumnankul, C. Pintavirooj, M. Sangworasilp and K. Hamamoto, “3D shape recovery based on tomography,”in Proceedings IEEE Signal Processing, August, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Defrise. “A short reader’s guide to 3D tomographic reconstruction,”in Journal onComputerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 25, pp. 113–6, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ArtemAmirkhanov, ChristophHeinzl, Michael Reiter, Johann Kastner, and M. Eduard Groller, “Projection-Based Metal-Artifact Reduction for Industrial 3D X-ray Computed Tomography,” in IEEE Transactions on visualization and computer graphics, vol. 17, no. 12, December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.Clackdoyle and M.Defrise, “Tomographic reconstruction in the 21st century. region-of-interest reconstruction from incomplete data,” in Journal onIEEE Signal Processing, vol. 60, pp. 60–80, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Zhou, K. Panetta, and S. Agaian, "3D CT baggage image enhancement based on order statistic decomposition," in Proceedings IEEE Inter. Conf. on, 2010, pp. 287-291.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SangtaeAhn, Abhijit J Chaudhari, Felix Darvas, Charles A Bouman and Richard M Leahy,” Fast iterative image reconstruction methods for fully 3D multispectral bioluminescence tomography,” in Journal on Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 53 pp. 3921, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edward J. Ciaccioa, Christina A. Tennysona, GovindBhagata, b, Suzanne K. Lewisa and Peter H.R. Greena, “Use of shape-from-shading to estimate three-dimensional architecture in the small intestinal lumen of celiac and control patients,” in Journal on Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Volume 111, pp. 676–684, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Sethian and A. Popovici, ”3-D traveltime computation using the fast marching method,” in Journal onGEOPHYSICS, vol. 64, pp. 516–523, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Venturras and I. Flaounas," Study of Radon Transformation and Application of its Inverse to NMR", Paper for " Algorithms in Molecular Biology" Course Assoc Prof. I. Emiris, 4 July, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Firas Wada and Mohamed Ali Hamdi, “3D Segmentation of Intravascular Ultrasound Images: A Fast-Marching Method,” in Journal on Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Vol. 1, pp. 29-36, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mai BabikerAdm andAbasMd Said, “3D Reconstruction using Interactive Shape from Shading,” in Journal onInternational Journal of Computer Applicationsvol. 28, pp. 20-24, August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Patel and W.A.P. Smith, “Shape-from-shading driven 3D Morphable Models for Illumination Insensitive Face Recognition”.In Proc. BMVC, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. M. Sheta, M. F. Mahmoud and E. H. Atta, “Evolutionary Computation Approach for Shape from Shading,”in Journal on IJICIS, vol. 5, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Kemelmacher-Shlizerman and R. Basri, “3D Face Reconstruction from a Single Image Using a Single Reference Face Shape”In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 33, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vikram Appia and Anthony Yezzi, “Symmetric Fast Marching Schemes for Better Numerical Isotrophy,” in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 2298-2304, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Diwakar, M. Kumar, CT image noise reduction based on adaptive Wienerfiltering with wavelet packet thresholding, in: 2014 InternationalConference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC), IEEE, 2014,pp. 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Diwakar, M. Kumar, Edge preservation based CT image denoising usingWiener filtering and thresholding in wavelet domain, in: 2016 FourthInternational Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing(PDGC), IEEE, 2016, pp. 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Diwakar, M. Kumar, A hybrid method based CT image denoising usingnonsubsampled contourlet and curvelet transforms, in: Proceedings ofInternational Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing,Springer, 2017, pp. 571–580.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Diwakar, M. Kumar, et al., CT image denoising based on complex wavelettransform using local adaptive thresholding and bilateral filtering., in:Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Women in Computingand Informatics, ACM, 2015, pp. 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Kumar, M. Diwakar, CT image denoising using locally adaptive shrinkagerule in tetrolet domain, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Kumar, M. Diwakar, Edge preservation based CT image denoising usingwavelet and curvelet transforms, in: Proceedings of Fifth InternationalConference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, Springer, 2016, pp.771–782.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Kumar, M. Diwakar, A new exponentially directional weighted functionbased CT image denoising using total variation, J. King Saud Univ. Comput.Inf. Sci. (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Kumar, M. Diwakar, A new locally adaptive patch variation based CT image denoising, Int. J. Image Graph. Signal Process. 8 (1) (2016) 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Diwakar, M. Kumar, A review on CT image noise and its denoising, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Elsvier, 2018, 42(1) pp. 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Diwakar, M. Kumar, CT image denoising using NLM and correlation based wavelet packet thresholding." IET Image Processing, , 2018, 12(5) pp. 708 - 715.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Sahu, A.K. Singh, S.P. Ghrera, and M. Elhoseny, “An approach for de-noising and contrast enhancement of retinal fundus image using CLAHE” Optics & Laser Technology, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sahu, Sima, Harsh Vikram Singh, Basant Kumar, and Amit Kumar Singh. "Statistical modeling and Gaussianization procedure based de-speckling algorithm for retinal OCT images." Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2018): 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sahu, Sima, Harsh Vikram Singh, Basant Kumar, and Amit Kumar Singh. "De-noising of ultrasound image using Bayesian approached heavy-tailed Cauchy distribution." Multimedia Tools and Applications (2017): 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sahu, Sima, Harsh Vikram Singh, Basant Kumar, and Amit Kumar Singh. "A Bayesian multiresolution approach for noise removal in medical magnetic resonance images." Journal of Intelligent Systems (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diwakar, M., Kumar, P. (2019). 3-D Shape Reconstruction Based CT Image Enhancement. In: Singh, A., Mohan, A. (eds) Handbook of Multimedia Information Security: Techniques and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15887-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15887-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15886-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15887-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics