Abstract
This chapter studies the importance of absolute-income and relative-income effects in explaining people’s well-being in Latin America. A happiness approach is followed. The empirical research uses the Latin American Gallup Survey 2007, with more than 14,000 observations covering all countries in the region and which contains information on household income and on life satisfaction. Reference-groups are constructed on the basis of country-gender-age criteria. It is found that Latin American’s well-being strongly depends on their relative income, while the absolute-income effect is of lesser importance. The relative-income effect is important and significant for all segments of the income distribution. These findings are consistent with Easterlin (1974) and have important implications for the implementation and design of economic policies and development strategies.
Keywords
‘No man is an island, entire of itself.’
John Donne
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Other criteria such as age brackets, gender and education or age brackets, gender and area of living provide results that are, in essence, similar. However, these criteria imply a pulverization of the data and lead to greater standard errors.
- 2.
Utility is understood either in its ordinal conception -which is useful for explaining and predicting behavior- or in its latent well-being conception -which is useful for public policy and for the design and evaluation of social-programs.
- 3.
This paper makes a semantic distinction between a person, who is defined as such in society, and an individual, who is out of any social context and whose role in functionalist models is to be the kernel for the construction of societies.
- 4.
The assumption of cardinality allows for simplifying the presentation of descriptive statistics as well as the implementation of simple econometric techniques, such as ordinary least squared regressions. It is important to state that the treatment of these variables as ordinal –such as using ordered-probit econometric techniques- does not imply any significant change in the main results from this investigation.
- 5.
Information regarding education in categories was calculated and provided by Cárdenas et al. (2008)
- 6.
This is an arbitrary classification; McBride (2001) used a variation that assumes people compare with those who are in a range of (−5, +5) years their age.
- 7.
If an additional criterion were considered, e.g.: a rural-urban criterion, then the number of groups would increase to 560; reducing the average number of observations in each group to about 25. Different criteria for group formation were followed: country-age-gender; country-age- gender-location; country-age-gender-education; and so on. It was found that the country-age-gender criterion provides clear results; while the country-age-gender-location criterion leads to similar results but with weaker significance tests, probably due to the reduced number of observations in each group.
References
Ball, R. & Chernova, K. (2005). Absolute Income, Relative Income, and Happiness. Manuscript
Binswanger, M. (2006). Why does income growth fail to make us happier? Searching for the treadmills behind the paradox of happiness. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 366–381.
Bossert, W., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2006). Reference groups and individual deprivation. Economic Letters, 90(3), 421–426.
Bossert, W., D’Ambrosio, C., & Peragine, V. (2007). Deprivation and social exclusion. Economica, 74(296), 777–803.
Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299.
Cárdenas, M., di Maro, V., & Mejía, C. (2008). Understanding the role of educational perceptions and victimization on wellbeing. Colombia: Fedesarrollo.
Clark, A. (2007). Happiness, habits and high rank: Comparisons in economic and social life. Working Paper, Paris School of Economics, March.
Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.
Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.
Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (1997). On relative wealth effects and the optimality of growth. Economics Letters, 54(1), 87–92.
D’Ambrosio C. & Frick, J. (2004). Subjective well-being and relative deprivation: An empirical link. Discussion Paper 449, DIW Berlin.
De Botton, A. (2004). Status anxiety. Mishawaka, IN: Hamish Hamilton Ltd.
Duesenberry, J. (1949). Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Falk, A., & Knell, M. (2004). Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous goals and reference standards. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 417–435.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 997–1019.
Frank, R. (1985). Choosing the right pond. Human behavior and the quest for status. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frank, R. (1989). Frames of Reference and the Quality of Life. American Economic Review, 79(2), 80–85.
Frank, R. (2000). Luxury fever: Money and happiness in an era of excess. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Frank, R. (2005). Does absolute income matter? In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics & happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 65–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. American Economic Review, 94(3), 730–740.
Kingdon, G., & Knight, J. (2007). Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 69–90.
Gasparini, L., Sosa Escudero, W., Marchionni, M. & Olivieri, S. (2008). Income, deprivation, and perceptions in Latin America and the Caribbean: New evidence from the Gallup World Poll. CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S57–S84.
Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Happiness & hardship: Opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Graham, C., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Is economic crisis reducing support for markets and democracy in Latin America? Some evidence from the economics of happiness. Journal of Latin American Studies, 36, 349–377.
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hirschman, A. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566.
Hyman, H. H. (1960). Reflections on reference groups. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(3), 383–396.
Kapteyn, A., & van Herwaarden, F. G. (1980). Interdependent welfare functions and optimal income distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 14(3), 375–397.
Kapteyn, A., van de Geer, S., van de Stadt, H., & Wansbeek, T. (1997). Interdependent preferences: An econometric analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(6), 665–686.
Keynes, J. M. (1931). Economic possibilities of our grandchildren, essays in persuasion. London: MacMillan.
Knell, M. (1999). Social comparisons, inequality, and growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 112(4), 664–695.
Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.
Marmot, M. (2004). Status Syndrome. London: Bloomsbury.
Marx, K. (1977). Wage Labour and Capital. In D. McLellan (Ed.), Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mazur, A., & Lamb, T. A. (1980). Testosterone, status, and mood in human males. Hormones and Behavior, 14(3), 236–246.
McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 45(3), 251–278.
McBride, M. (2010). Money, happiness, and aspirations: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(3), 262–276.
Merton, R., & Kitt, A. (1950). Contribution to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. Merton & P. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.
Michalos, A. (1985). Multiple Discrepancy Theory. Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–414.
Parducci, A. (1968). The relativism of absolute judgments. Scientific American, 219(6), 84–90.
Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Persky, J., & Tam, M. Y. (1990). Local status and national social welfare. Journal of Regional Science, 30(2), 229–238.
Pham, T. K. C. (2005). Economic growth and status-seeking through personal wealth. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 407–427.
Postlewaite, A. (1998). The social basis of interdependent preferences. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 779–800.
Robson, A. (1992). Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk. Econometrica, 60(4), 837–857.
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in Twentieth-Century England. London: Routledge.
Samuelson, L. (2004). Information-based relative consumption effects. Econometrica, 72(1), 93–118.
Schor, J. (1998). The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting and the new consumer. New York: Basic Books.
Schor, J. (1999). The new politics of consumption: Why Americans want so much more than they need. Boston Review, 24(3–4), 4–9.
Schor, J. (2002). Understanding the new consumerism: Inequality, emulation and the erosion of well being. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 23(1).
Senik, C. (2004). Relativizing relative income. Working Paper 2004–17. DELTA.
Senik, C. (2007). Income comparisons. Which income gaps matter most to people? Working Paper 2007–19. Paris School of Economics.
Sloane, P. J., & Williams, H. (2000). Job satisfaction, comparison earnings, and gender. Labour, 14(3), 473–501.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library. Edition 1937.
Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(1), 89–109.
Suls, J., & Wills, T. A. (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237–260). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
Townsend, P. (1962). The meaning of poverty. British Journal of Sociology, 13(3), 221–223.
Van Praag, B. (1971). The welfare function of income in Belgium: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 2(3), 337–369.
Van Praag, B. (1977). The perception of welfare inequality. European Economic Review, 10(2), 189–207.
Van Praag, B. (1993). The relativity of welfare. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 362–385). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Van Praag, B., Kapteyn, A., & van Herwaarden, F. G. (1979). The definition and measurement of social reference spaces. The Netherlands’ Journal of Sociology, 15(1), 13–25.
Van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Reprint 1934. New York: Modern Library.
Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 1978 English edition as Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rojas, M. (2019). Relative Income and Happiness in Latin America: Implications for Inequality Debates. In: Rojas, M. (eds) The Economics of Happiness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15835-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15835-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15834-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15835-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)