Skip to main content

Modeling User Actions in Job Search

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2019)

Abstract

Users of online job search tools interact with result pages in three different ways: via impressions, via clicks, and via applications. We investigate the relationship between these three kinds of interaction using logs provided by Seek.com, an Australian-based job search service. Our focus is on understanding the extent to which the three interaction types can be used to predict each other. In particular we examine models for inferring impressions from clicks, thereby providing system designers with new options for evaluating search result pages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Azzopardi, L., Thomas, P., Craswell, N.: Measuring the utility of search engine result pages. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 605–614 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carterette, B.: System effectiveness, user models, and user utility: a conceptual framework for investigation. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 903–912 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cutrell, E., Guan, Z.: What are you looking for? An eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 407–416 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hasan, M.A., Parikh, N., Singh, G., Sundaresan, N.: Query suggestion for e-commerce sites. In: Proceedings of WSDM, pp. 765–774 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Gay, G.: Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. SIGIR Forum 51(1), 4–11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klöckner, K., Wirschum, N., Jameson, A.: Depth- and breadth-first processing of search result lists. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 1539–1539 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mansouri, B., Zahedi, M.S., Campos, R., Farhoodi, M.: Online job search: study of users’ search behavior using search engine query logs. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 1185–1188 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moffat, A., Zobel, J.: Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 2.1–2.27 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moffat, A., Bailey, P., Scholer, F., Thomas, P.: Incorporating user expectations and behavior into the measurement of search effectiveness. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 35(3), 24.1–24.38 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parikh, N., Sundaresan, N.: Inferring semantic query relations from collective user behavior. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 349–358 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smucker, M.D., Clarke, C.L.A.: Time-based calibration of effectiveness measures. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 95–104 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spina, D., et al.: Understanding user behavior in job and talent search: an initial investigation. In: SIGIR Workshop. eCommerce (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas, P., Scholer, F., Moffat, A.: What users do: the eyes have it. In: Banchs, R.E., Silvestri, F., Liu, T.-Y., Zhang, M., Gao, S., Lang, J. (eds.) AIRS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8281, pp. 416–427. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45068-6_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. White, R.W., Drucker, S.M.: Investigating behavioral variability in web search. In: Proceedings of WWW, pp. 21–30 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wicaksono, A.F., Moffat, A.: Exploring interaction patterns in job search. In: Proceedings of Australasian Document Computing Symposium, pp. 2.1–2.8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wicaksono, A.F., Moffat, A.: Empirical evidence for search effectiveness models. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 1571–1574 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Y., Park, L.A.F., Moffat, A.: Click-based evidence for decaying weight distributions in search effectiveness metrics. Inf. Retr. 13(1), 46–69 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects scheme (project number LP150100252) and by Seek.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfan Farizki Wicaksono .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wicaksono, A.F., Moffat, A., Zobel, J. (2019). Modeling User Actions in Job Search. In: Azzopardi, L., Stein, B., Fuhr, N., Mayr, P., Hauff, C., Hiemstra, D. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11437. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15712-8_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15712-8_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15711-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15712-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics