Abstract
The Standard Model of elementary particle physics is one of the best theories that we currently have and thereby invites realist engagement. Adopting a realist stance towards it involves careful consideration of the nature of the symmetries that it incorporates. Here I begin with such a consideration and argue that it leads us to a form of structural realism that, following Cassirer might be called ‘Parmenidean’. I conclude with some thoughts on how this meshes with ‘local’ forms of realism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, D. J., Halvorson, H., & Swanson, N. (2015). The conventionality of parastatistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66, 929–976.
Bangu, S. (2012). The applicability of mathematics in science: Indispensability and ontology. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s metaphysics: Laws and properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brading, K., & Brown, H. R. (2003). Symmetries and Noether’s theorems. In K. Brading & E. Castellani (Eds.), Symmetries in physics: Philosophical reflections (pp. 89–109). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Brading, K., & Castellani, E. (2008) Symmetry and symmetry breaking. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/symmetry-breaking/.
Brown, H., & Holland, P. (2004). Dynamical versus variational symmetries: Understanding Noether’s first theorem. Molecular Physics, 102, 1133–1139.
Bueno, O., & French, S. (2018). Applying mathematics: Immersion, inference and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cassirer, E. (1936/1956). Determinismus und Indeterminismus in der Modernen Physik. Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift 42. Translated as Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.
Cei, A., & French, S. (2014). Getting away from governance: Laws, symmetries and objects. Méthode – Analytic Perspectives, 3. https://doi.org/10.13135/2281-0498%2F4
Cohen, J., & Callender, C. (2009). A better best system account of lawhood. Philosophical Studies, 145, 1–34.
Cordero, A. (2001). Realism and underdetermination: Some clues from the practices-up. Philosophy of Science, S68(2001), 301–312.
Esfeld, M. (2015). Review of The structure of the world. Mind, 124, 334–338.
Esfeld, M., Lazarovici, D., Hubert, M., & Dürr, D. (2014). The ontology of Bohmian mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65, 773–796.
French, S. (1995). The esperable uberty of quantum chromodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 26, 87–105.
French, S. (2001). Quantum physics and the ontology of structures. In Physis: Proceedings of the IVth International Ontology Congress (A tribute to John Bell), San Sebastian, pp. 175–181.
French, S. (2002). A phenomenological approach to the measurement problem: Husserl and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 22, 467–491.
French, S. (2003). Scribbling on the blank sheet: Eddington’s structuralist conception of objects. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, 227–259.
French, S. (2006). Structure as a weapon of the realist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106, 167–185.
French, S. (2014). The structure of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
French, S. (Forthcoming). Doing away with dispositions: Powers in the context of modern physics. In A. S. Meincke (Ed.), Dispositionalism: Perspectives from metaphysics and the philosophy of science. Springer Synthese Library, Springer.
French, S., & Krause, D. (2006). Identity in physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
French, S., & McKenzie, K. (2012). Thinking outside the (tool)box: Towards a more productive engagement between metaphysics and philosophy of physics’ with K. McKenzie. The European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 8, 42–59.
French, S., & Ladyman, J. (2011). In defence of ontic structural realism. In A. Bokulich & P. Bokulich (Eds.), Scientific structuralism (pp. 25–42). Dordrecth: Springer.
French, S., & Saatsi, J. (2018). Symmetries and explanatory dependencies. In J. Saatsi & A. Reutlinger (Eds.), Explanation beyond causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, W. E. (1921, 1922, 1924). Logic (Vol. 1: 1921; vol. 2: 1922; vol. 3 1924). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the hypertext version see http://www.ditext.com/johnson/toc.html
Ladyman, J. (2016). In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Structural realism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/structuralrealism/.
Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, M. (2007). Laws and meta-laws of nature: Conservation laws and symmetries. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(457–481), 457–481.
Lange, M. (2009). Laws and lawmakers: Science, metaphysics, and the laws of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, M. (2012). There sweep great general principles which all the laws seem to follow. In K. Bennett & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Oxford studies in metaphysics (Vol. 7, pp. 154–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowe, E. J. (2005). Ontological dependence. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/dependence-ontological/.
McKenzie, K. (2014). On the fundamentality of symmetries. Philosophy of Science, 81, 1090–1102.
Post, H. R. (1971) (1971 [1993]). Correspondence, invariance and Heuristics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2, 213–255; reprinted In S. French & H. Kamminga (Eds.), Correspondence, invariance and Heuristics: Essays in honour of heinz post. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 148), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press (1993), 1–44.
Psillos, S. (2006). What do powers do when they are not manifested? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72, 135–156.
Saatsi, J. (2016). Replacing recipe realism. Synthese, First Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11229-015-0962-3.
Wallace, D. (2012). The emergent multiverse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, J. (2012). Fundamental determinables. Philosophers Imprint 12. http://www.philosophersimprint.org/012004/.
Wolff, J. (2011). Do objects depend on structures? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science., 63, 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axr041.
Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica 43: 99–124; reprinted In D. Papineau (Ed.), The philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
French, S. (2019). Structural Realism and the Standard Model. In: Cordero, A. (eds) Philosophers Look at Quantum Mechanics. Synthese Library, vol 406. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15659-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15659-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15658-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15659-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)