Skip to main content

Country Wealth Influencing University Students’ Perceptions on Entrepreneurship Feasibility: A Survey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
R&D Management in the Knowledge Era

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

  • 2358 Accesses

Abstract

Entrepreneurship studies have been attracting more attention in the last few years. Several articles provide a background and discuss the importance of entrepreneurship under a variety of circumstances, such as Ács et al. [1], van Stel et al. [2], and Intrama et al. [3]. University students of today are, undoubtedly, the leaders of tomorrow. Therefore, it is vital to understand their ideas, preferences, opinions, and perceptions in general, as to get a sense of what to expect from these future leaders and also to identify weaknesses and potential for improvements. Given the role both entrepreneurship and students play in our society, it is important to put those in context and to study them. Dabic et al. [4] have touched upon the convergence between students and entrepreneurship and this research is another building block to be added to the body of knowledge on the field—hoping to advance the understanding of our future leaders and how they perceive such a critical pillar of modern civilization. This study research question is:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Intrama, V., Sookbanjung, S., Santawee, K., & Teerasawad, P. (2016). Path of creativity in entrepreneur: Basic concept of creative economy development. In J. I. Kantola, T. Barath, S. Nazir, & T. Andre (Eds.), Advances in human factors, business management, training and education (Vol. 498, pp. 263–272). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dabic, M., Daim, T., Bayraktaroglu, E., Novak, I., & Basic, M. (2012). Exploring gender differences in attitudes of university students towards entrepreneurship: An international survey. International Journal of Gender and Extrepreneurship, 4(3), 316–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2014). Technovation inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation, 34(12), 773–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, C., Shi, Y., Wu, C., Wu, Z., & Zheng, L. (2016). Policies of promoting entrepreneurship and angel investment: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 29, 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. (2010). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence. In A. Freytag & R. Thurik (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and culture (pp. 201–225). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Latent entrepreneurship across nations. European Economic Review, 45(4), 680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grilo, I., & Irigoyen, J.-M. (2006). Entrepreneurship in the EU: To wish and not to be. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández, J., Liñán, F., & Santos, F. J. (2009). Cognitive aspects of potential entrepreneurs in southern and northern Europe: An analysis using GEM-data. Revista de Economía Mundial, 23, 151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schaeffer, V., & Matt, M. (2016). Development of academic entrepreneurship in a non-mature context: The role of the university as a hub-organisation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(9), 724–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daim, T., Dabic, M., & Bayraktaroglu, E. (2016). Students’ entrepreneurial behavior: International and gender differences. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bašić, M., Novak, I., & Dabić, M. (2011). Study on entrepreneurial environment based on cross country differences. American Journal of Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  14. IECONOMICS INC. (2017). GDP per capita - countries - list. Retrieved March 14, 2017, from http://www.tradingeconomics.com/country-list/gdp-per-capita

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marina Dabić or Tuğrul Daim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lavoie, J.R., Dabić, M., Daim, T., Shifrer, D. (2019). Country Wealth Influencing University Students’ Perceptions on Entrepreneurship Feasibility: A Survey. In: Daim, T., Dabić, M., Başoğlu, N., Lavoie, J.R., Galli, B.J. (eds) R&D Management in the Knowledge Era. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15409-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics