Skip to main content

Social Credibility Incorporating Semantic Analysis and Machine Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Future Research Directions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications (WAINA 2019)

Abstract

The wealth of Social Big Data (SBD) represents a unique opportunity for organisations to obtain the excessive use of such data abundance to increase their revenues. Hence, there is an imperative need to capture, load, store, process, analyse, transform, interpret, and visualise such manifold social datasets to develop meaningful insights that are specific to an application’s domain. This paper lays the theoretical background by introducing the state-of-the-art literature review of the research topic. This is associated with a critical evaluation of the current approaches, and fortified with certain recommendations indicated to bridge the research gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.gartner.com/document/3383817?ref=solrAll&refval=175496307&qid=34ddf525422cc71383ee22c858f2238a, Visited in 25/10/2016.

References

  1. Abu-Salih, B., Wongthongtham, P., Kit, C.Y.: Twitter mining for ontology-based domain discovery incorporating machine learning. J. Knowl. Manag. 22(5), 949–981 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nabipourshiri, R., Abu-Salih, B., Wongthongtham, P.: Tree-based classification to users’ trustworthiness in OSNs In: Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, pp. 190–194. ACM, Brisbane, Australia (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wongthongtham, P., Abu Salih, B.: Ontology and trust based data warehouse in new generation of business intelligence: state-of-the-art, challenges, and opportunities. In: 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abu-Salih, B., et al.: Towards a methodology for social business intelligence in the era of big social data incorporating trust and semantic analysis. In: Second International Conference on Advanced Data and Information Engineering (DaEng-2015). Springer, Bali, Indonesia (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abu-Salih, B., et al.: CredSaT: credibility ranking of users in big social data incorporating semantic analysis and temporal factor. J. Inform. Sci. 0(0), 0165551518790424 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abu-Salih, B.: Trustworthiness in Social Big Data Incorporating Semantic Analysis, Machine Learning and Distributed Data Processing. Curtin University (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, K.Y., et al.: Affective design using machine learning: a survey and its prospect of conjoining big data. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 1–19 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sherchan, W., Nepal, S., Paris, C.: A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Comput. Surv. 45(4), 47 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Passant, A., et al.: Enabling trust and privacy on the social web. In: W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Podobnik, V., et al.: How to calculate trust between social network users? In: 2012 20th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM). IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal, M., Bin, Z.: Detecting malicious activities using backward propagation of trustworthiness over heterogeneous social graph. In: 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Massa, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Using trust in recommender systems: an experimental analysis, in trust management. In: Jensen, C., Poslad, S., Dimitrakos, T. (eds.) pp. 221–235. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta, P., et al.: WTF: the who to follow service at Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 505–514. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gallege, L.S., et al.: Towards trust-based recommender systems for online software services. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference, pp. 61–64. ACM, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, G., et al.: A social trust path recommendation system in contextual online social networks. In: Chen, L., et al. (eds.) Web Technologies and Applications, pp. 652–656. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alahmadi, D.H., Zeng, X.J.: ISTS: implicit social trust and sentiment based approach to recommender systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(22), 8840–8849 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. AlRubaian, M., et al.: A multistage credibility analysis model for microblogs. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, B., et al.: A trust-based sentiment delivering calculation method in microblog. Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag. 21(4–6), 185–198 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bae, Y., Lee, H.: Sentiment analysis of twitter audiences: measuring the positive or negative influence of popular Twitterers. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63(12), 2521–2535 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawabe, T., et al.: Tweet credibility analysis evaluation by improving sentiment dictionary. In: 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Momeni, E., Cardie, C., Diakopoulos, N.: A survey on assessment and ranking methodologies for user-generated content on the web. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 48(3), 41 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amalanathan, A., Anouncia, S.M.: A review on user influence ranking factors in social networks. Int. J. Web Based Commun. 12(1), 74–83 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruan, Y., Durresi, A.: A survey of trust management systems for online social communities–trust modeling, trust inference and attacks. Knowl.-Based Syst. 106, 150–163 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J.: Publishing on the semantic web. Nature 410(6832), 1023 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43(5), 907–928 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. De Nart, D., et al.: A content-based approach to social network analysis: a case study on research communities, in digital libraries on the move. In: Calvanese, D., De Nart, D., Tasso, C. (eds.) 11th Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries, IRCDL 2015, Bolzano, Italy, 29–30 January 2015, pp. 142–154. Springer, Cham, 2016, Revised Selected Papers

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chianese, A., Marulli, F., Piccialli, F.: Cultural heritage and social pulse: a semantic approach for CH sensitivity discovery in social media data. In: 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michelson, M., Macskassy, S.A.: Discovering users; topics of interest on twitter: a first look. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schonhofen, P.: Identifying document topics using the wikipedia category network. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 456–462. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hassan, M.M., Karray, F., Kamel, M.S.: Automatic document topic identification using wikipedia hierarchical ontology. In: 2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Anthes, G.: Topic models Vs unstructured data. Commun. ACM 53(12), 16–18 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, C., et al. Markov topic models. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(4–5), 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(Jan), 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Karami, A., et al.: Fuzzy approach topic discovery in health and medical corpora. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 1–12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hofmann, T.: Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, Y., et al.: Topic modeling for evaluating students; reflective writing: a case study of pre-service teachers’ journals. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nichols, L.G.: A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the national science foundation. Scientometrics 100(3), 741–754 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Weng, J., et al.: Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential Twitterers. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Asharaf, S., Alessandro, Z.: Generating and visualizing topic hierarchies from microblogs: an iterative Latent Dirichlet allocation approach. In: 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Quercia, D., Askham, H., Crowcroft, J.: TweetLDA: supervised topic classification and link prediction in Twitter. In: The 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 247–250. ACM, Evanston, Illinois (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Onan, A., Korukoglu, S., Bulut, H.: LDA-based topic modelling in text sentiment classification: an empirical analysis. Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Appl. 7(1), 101–119 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cha, M., et al.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. ICWSM 10, 10–17 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Silva, A., et al.: ProfileRank: finding relevant content and influential users based on information diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jiang, W., Wang, G., Wu, J.: Generating trusted graphs for trust evaluation in online social networks. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 31, 48–58 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu, B., Zhang, L.: A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Aggarwal, C., Zhai, C. (eds.) Mining Text Data, pp. 415–463. Springer, Cham (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Balog, K., et al.: Expertise retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 6(2–3), 127–256 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yin, H.Z., et al.: Dynamic user modeling in social media systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 33(3), 10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abbasi, M.-A., Liu, H.: Measuring user credibility in social media, in social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction. In: Greenberg, A., Kennedy, W., Bos, N. (eds.) pp. 441–448. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yardi, S., et al.: Detecting spam in a Twitter network (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Manyika, J., et al.: Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chen, M., et al.: Open issues and outlook. In: Big Data, pp. 81–89. Springer International Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  53. LavbiÄŤ, D., et al.: Traversal and relations discovery among business entities and people using semantic web technologies and trust management. In: Databases and Information Systems VII: Selected Papers from the Tenth International Baltic Conference, DB & IS 2012. IOS Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Herzig, J., Mass, Y., Roitman, H.: An author-reader influence model for detecting topic-based influencers in social media. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Shen, W., Wang, J., Han, J.: Entity linking with a knowledge base: Issues, techniques and solutions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27(2), 443–460 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Free Social Media Analytics Tools (2016). http://simplymeasured.com/free-social-media-tools/

  57. Li, C., et al.: Topic Modeling for short texts with auxiliary word embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilal Abu-Salih .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abu-Salih, B. et al. (2019). Social Credibility Incorporating Semantic Analysis and Machine Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Future Research Directions. In: Barolli, L., Takizawa, M., Xhafa, F., Enokido, T. (eds) Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications. WAINA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 927. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15035-8_87

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics