Skip to main content

Comparative Cost Evaluation of Material Removal Process and Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industrial Engineering and Operations Management I (IJCIEOM 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 280))

Abstract

In last years, the market penetration of the Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes in aerospace industry is continuously growing, if on one hand the advantages of AM process are indisputable under technological perspective, on the other hand the costs due to AM process are quite variable and, in many cases, identifying a preliminary cost estimation is very difficult. Indeed, engineering and manufacturing costs are strongly dependent by complexity and by specificity of the part to be manufactured. The purpose of this paper consists in developing a cost model based on a computational algorithm that allows to quickly asses the overall cost due to design and production of part by means of one of the most recently AM technology (Wire+Arc AM). Consistently, the model is adopted for evaluate and compare the process costs due to production of a batch of aerospace parts, adopting both Wire+Arc AM (WAAM) and traditional machining technologies. The results of the experimental study conducted, show that the most cost-effective technology, between WAAM and traditional machining, is strongly depending on batch size to be manufactured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Facchini, F., Mossa, G., Mummolo, G.: A model based on artificial neural network for risk assessment to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in workplace. In: Proceedings of the European Modeling and Simulation Symposium, pp. 282–289 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Metallurgy Additive Manufacturing for Aerospace: Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2017 to 2023, https://www.marketresearchreports.com/wintergreen-research/metallurgy-additive-manufacturing-aerospace-market-shares-strategies-and. Last accessed 18 Dec 2018

  3. Boenzi, F., Digiesi, S., Facchini, F., Mossa, G., Mummolo, G.: Greening activities in warehouses: a model for identifying sustainable strategies in material handling. In: Proceedings of the 26th DAAAM International Symposium, pp. 0980–0988 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Facchini, F., Boenzi, F., Digiesi, S., Mossa, G., Mummolo, G., Verriello, R.: Minimizing the carbon footprint of material handling equipment: comparison of electric and LPG forklifts. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 9(5), 1035–1046 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander, P., Allen, S., Dutta, D.: Part orientation and build cost determination in layered manufacturing. Comput. Aided Des. 30(5), 343–356 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hopkinson, N., Dickens, P.: Analysis of rapid manufacturing—using layer manufacturing processes for production. Proc. Institut. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 31–39 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ruffo, M., Tuck, C., Hauge, R.: Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing-laser sintering production for low to medium volumes. Proc. Institut. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manufact. 220(9), 1417–1427 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumers, M., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., Hague, R.: The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 102, 193–201 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martina, F., Stewart, W., Wire+Arc Additive Manufacturing vs. Traditional Machining from Solid: A Cost Comparison, https://waammat.com/documents. Last accessed 15 Jan 2018

  10. Fera, M., Fruggiero, F., Costabile, G., Lambiase, A., Pham, D.T.: A new mixed production cost allocation model for additive manufacturing (MiProCAMAM). Int. J. Advanc. Manufact. Technol. 92, 4275–4291 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams, S.W., Martina, F., Addison, A.C., Ding, J., Pardal, G., Colegrove, P.: Wire+Arc additive manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32(7), 641–647 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Priarone, P.C., Robiglio, M., Ingarao, G., Settineri, L.: Assessment of cost and energy requirements of electron beam melting (EBM) and machining processes. Sustain. Design Manufact. 723–733 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Facchini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Facchini, F., De Chirico, A., Mummolo, G. (2019). Comparative Cost Evaluation of Material Removal Process and Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace Industry. In: Reis, J., Pinelas, S., Melão, N. (eds) Industrial Engineering and Operations Management I. IJCIEOM 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14969-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics