Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

General Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essays on the Historicity of Capital

  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

In conclusion, we can affirm, without ambiguity, that capital historicity is a criterion that allows delimiting the epistemological rupture between the different Schools: the very object of Economics, the kind of micro and macro causalities and the way empirical instruments are designed to study the empirical data will be different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blaug, Mark. 1992. The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvoskin, Ariel, and Saverio M. Fratini. 2016. On the Samuelson-Etula Master Function and the Capital Controversy. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (6): 1032–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, Maurice. 1969. Rationalité et irrationalité en économie. Paris: Librairie François Maspéro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herscovici, Alain. 2002. Dinâmica Macroeconômica: uma interpretação a partir de Marx e de Keynes. São Paulo: EDUC/EDUFES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuzzo, Maria Cristina, and Rosselli Annalisa. 2011. Sraffa and His Arguments Against ‘Marginism’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 35: 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercelli, Alessandro. 1985. Keynes, Schumpeter, Marx and the Structural Instability of Capitalism. In L’hétérodoxie dans la pensée économique, org. G. Deleplace and P. Maurisson. Paris: Cahiers d’Economie Politique, Anthropos.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Methodological Foundations of Macroeconomics: Keynes and Lucas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil

    Alain Herscovici

Authors
  1. Alain Herscovici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Herscovici .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herscovici, A. (2019). General Conclusion. In: Essays on the Historicity of Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14838-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14838-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14837-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14838-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation