Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on Typologies of Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Juri Lotman - Culture, Memory and History
  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

One of the common misconceptions for anyone who thinks about history or about typologies of cultures and civilizations is to think “That never was so it could never have been” or, to put it differently, “It is unknown to me and so it is impossible.” In practical terms, this means that one insignificant—when compared with the general unwritten and written history of humankind—chronological layer that can be studied with the help of well-preserved written sources is taken as the norm for all historical processes, and the culture of that period, as the standard for all human cultures.

Originally published as “Neskol’ko myslei o tipologii kul’tur.” In Iazyki kul’tury i problemy perevodimosti, B. A. Uspenskij (ed.), 3–11. Moscow: Nauka, 1987. The translation here is from Iurii Lotman, Izbrannye stat’i. Vol. 1: Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury, 102–109. Tallinn: Aleksandra, 1992.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baratynskii, E. A. 1957a. “Predrassudok, on oblomok.” In Polnoe sobranie stikhotvorenii, E. N. Kupreianova (ed.), 175–176. Leningrad: Sovetskii Pisatel’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baratynskii, E. A. 1957b. “Primety.” In Polnoe sobranie stikhotvorenii, E. N. Kupreianova (ed.), 176–177. Leningrad: Sovetskii Pisatel’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What Is Enlightenment, Lewis White Beck (trans.). Second Edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph. 1938. Visits to England, as Described in his Letters and Diaries, Margaret L. Mare and W. H. Quarrell (trans. and ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 2014. Euthyphro; Apology; Crito; Phaedo; Phaedrus. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postnikov, M. M. and A. T. Fomenko. 1980. “Novye metodiki statisticheskogo analiza narrativno-tsifrovogo materiala drevnei istorii” (pre-print version), 1–36. Moscow AN SSSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pushkin, Aleksandr Sergeevich. 1959–1962. Sobranie sochinenii v 10 tomakh, D. D. Blagoi et al. (eds.). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia Literatura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor. 1975. Revelation and Divination in Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lotman, J. (2019). Some Thoughts on Typologies of Culture. In: Tamm, M. (eds) Juri Lotman - Culture, Memory and History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14710-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics