Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Model of an Integrated Analytics Decision Support System for Situational Proactive Control of Recovery Processes in Service-Modularized Supply Chain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 276))

  • 2592 Accesses

Abstract

In the supply chain (SC) recovery process, a disruptive event, planning of the recovery control policy and implementation of this policy are distributed in time and subject to SC structural and parametrical dynamics. In other words, environment, SC structure and its operational parameters may change in the period between the planning of the recovery control policy and its implementation. As such, situational proactive control with combined use of simulation-optimization and analytics is proposed in the paper to improve processes of transition between a disrupted and a restored SC state. Implementation of situational proactive control can reduce investments in robustness and increase resilience by obviating the time traps in transition process control problems. This chapter develops a model of a decision support system for situational proactive control of SC recovery processes based on a combination of optimization and analytics techniques. More specifically, three dynamic models are developed and integrated with each other, i.e. a model of SC material flow control, a model of SC recovery control and a model of SC recovery control adjustment. The given models are developed within a cyber-physical SC framework based on the service modularization approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behzadi, G., O’Sullivan, M. J., Olsen, T. L., Scrimgeour, F., & Zhang, A. (2017). Robust and resilient strategies for managing supply disruptions in an agribusiness supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DHL (2018). Retrived February 4, 2018, from https://resilience360.com/.

  • Dolgui, A., & Proth, J. M. (2010). Supply chain engineering: Useful methods and techniques. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 414–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., Sethi S., & Sokolov, B. (2019). Scheduling in production, supply chain and Industry 4.0 systems by optimal control: fundamentals, state-of-the-art, and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 57(2), 411–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunke, F., Heckmann, I., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2018). Time traps in supply chains: I optimal still good enough? European Journal of Operational Research, 264, 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, M., Doran, D., Mee, D., Papadopoulos T., & Dubey R. (2018). The design and delivery of modular legal services: Implications for supply chain strategy. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1449976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V., He, B., & Sethi, S. P. (2015). Contingent sourcing under supply disruption and competition. International Journal of Production Research, 53(10), 3006–3027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, J., Alavifard, F., Ivanov, D., & Jahani, H. (2018). A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply chain. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.08.008.

  • Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2013). Dynamic coordinated scheduling in the supply chain under a process modernization. International Journal of Production Research, 51(9), 2680–2697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Pavlov, A. (2013). Dual problem formulation and its application to optimal re-design of an integrated production-distribution network with structure dynamics and ripple effect considerations. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5386–5403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D., Sokolov B., & Dilou Raguinia, E.A. (2014a). Integrated dynamic scheduling of material flows and distributed information services in collaborative cyber-physical supply networks. International Journal of Systems Science: Services & Logistics, 1(1), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D., Sokolov B., & Dolgui A. (2014b). The Ripple effect in supply chains: Trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D., Sokolov, B., & Pavlov, A. (2014c). Optimal distribution (re)planning in a centralized multi-stage network under conditions of ripple effect and structure dynamics. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(2), 758–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., B. Sokolov, A. Pavlov, A. Dolgui, & D. Pavlov. (2016a). Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies. Transportation Research: Part E, 90, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., Dolgui, A., Werner, F., & Ivanova, M. (2016b). A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 54(2), 386–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui A., & Sokolov B. (2016c). Robust dynamic schedule coordination control in the supply chain. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 94(1), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D. (2017) Simulation-based ripple effect modelling in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(7), 2083–2101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D., Tsipoulanidis A., & Schönberger J. (2017a). Global supply chain and services management (1st ed). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui A., Sokolov B., & Ivanova M. (2017b). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D., Pavlov A., Pavlov D., & Sokolov B. (2017c). Minimization of disruption-related return flows in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D. (2018). Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2018a). Scheduling of recovery actions in the supply chain with resilience analysis considerations. International Journal of Production Research, 56(19), 6473–6490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Sethi S., Dolgui A., & Sokolov, B. (2018b). A survey on the control theory applications to operational systems, supply chain management and Industry 4.0. Annual Reviews in Control, 46, 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D. (2019). Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 127, 558–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Sethi, S., & Zhang, J. (2017). Mitigating supply uncertainty: The interplay between diversification and pricing. Production and Operations Management, 26(3), 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. B., & Markus, L. (1967). Foundations of optimal control theory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. R., Zobel, C. W., Melnyk, S. A., & Griffis, S. E. (2018). Supply chain risk and resilience: Theory building through structured experiments and simulation. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1421787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. G., Buijs, P., Szirbik, N. B., & Wortmann, J. C. (Hans). (2014). Intelligent products for enhancing the utilization of tracking technology in transportation. International Journal of Services & Production Management, 34(4), 422–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetto H., Iung B., Ivanov D., Weichhart G., Wang X. (2019). Challenges for the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprises of the future. Annual Reviews in Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.02.002.

  • Pavlov, A., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Hybrid fuzzy-probabilistic approach to supply chain resilience assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(2), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, A., Ivanov, D., Pavlov, D., & Slinko, A. (2019). Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03182-6.

  • RM. (2018). Retrieved February 10, 2018, from https://www.riskmethods.net/en/software/overview.

  • Sawik, T. (2017). A portfolio approach to supply chain disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 55(7), 1970–1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, K. P., & Blackhurst, J. (2018). Supply chain disruption propagation: A systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, T. G., Kumar, S., Stecke, K. E., Glover, F. W., & Ehlen, M. A. (2017). Mitigating disruptions in a multi-echelon supply chain using adaptive ordering. Omega, 68, 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, X. F., & Dong, M. (2012). Supply disruption and reactive strategies in an assemble-to-order supply chain with time-sensitive demand. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. (2005). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. (2015). Preparing for disruptions through early detection. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, D., Teucke, M., & Freitag, M. (2018). Effects of sensor-based quality data in automotive supply chains–a simulation study. In: M. Freitag, H. Kotzab, J. Pannek (Eds.) Dynamics in logistics. LDIC 2018, Bremen 20–22, 2018 (pp. 289–297). Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theorin, A., Bengtsson, K., Provost, J., Lieder, M., Johnsson, C., Lundholm, T., & Lennartson, B. (2017). An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), 1297–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, B. T. (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for man–aging supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52(5), 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UPS (2018). Retrieved February 11, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYoNd2nQqLg.

  • Wilkinson G. (2018). Integrating artificial intelligence with simulation modeling. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from https://www.anylogic.com/blog/.

  • Xia, Y., Yang, M. H., Golany, B., Gilbert, S. M., & Yu, G. (2004). Real-time disruption management in a two-stage production and inventory system. IIE Transactions, 36(2), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., et al. (2017). Mitigating supply chain disruptions through interconnected logistics services in the physical internet. International Journal of Production Research, 55(14), 3970–3983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J., Talluri, S., Yildiz, H., Ho, W. (2018). Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: A holistic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelbst, P. J., Green, K. W., Sower, V. E., & Reyes, P. M. (2012). Impact of RFID on manufacturing effectiveness and efficiency. International Journal of Services & Production Management, 32(3), 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research project No. 18-07-01272 and State project No. 0073-2019-0004

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Law, Department of Business and Economics, Berlin School of Economics and Law, 10825, Berlin, Germany

    Dmitry Ivanov

  2. Saint Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the RAS (SPIIRAS), V.O. 14 Line, 39, 199178, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Boris Sokolov

Authors
  1. Dmitry Ivanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Boris Sokolov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry Ivanov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Economics, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Germany

    Dmitry Ivanov

  2. Department of Automation, Production and Computer Sciences, IMT Atlantique, LS2N - CNRS UMR, Nantes, France

    Alexandre Dolgui

  3. SPIIRAS, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Boris Sokolov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B. (2019). A Model of an Integrated Analytics Decision Support System for Situational Proactive Control of Recovery Processes in Service-Modularized Supply Chain. In: Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. (eds) Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 276. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14302-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation