Skip to main content

Learning Best Response Strategies for Agents in Ad Exchanges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11450))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ad exchanges are widely used in platforms for online display advertising. Autonomous agents operating in these exchanges must learn policies for interacting profitably with a diverse, continually changing, but unknown market. We consider this problem from the perspective of a publisher, strategically interacting with an advertiser through a posted price mechanism. The learning problem for this agent is made difficult by the fact that information is censored, i.e., the publisher knows if an impression is sold but no other quantitative information. We address this problem using the Harsanyi-Bellman Ad Hoc Coordination (HBA) algorithm [1, 3], which conceptualises this interaction in terms of a Stochastic Bayesian Game and arrives at optimal actions by best responding with respect to probabilistic beliefs maintained over a candidate set of opponent behaviour profiles. We adapt and apply HBA to the censored information setting of ad exchanges. Also, addressing the case of stochastic opponents, we devise a strategy based on a Kaplan-Meier estimator for opponent modelling. We evaluate the proposed method using simulations wherein we show that HBA-KM achieves substantially better competitive ratio and lower variance of return than baselines, including a Q-learning agent and a UCB-based online learning agent, and comparable to the offline optimal algorithm.

This work was partially supported from the Greek State Scholarship Foundation by the project “IKY Scholarship” from resources of ESF and ESPA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albrecht, S.V., Ramamoorthy, S.: A game-theoretic model and best-response learning method for ad hoc coordination in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1155–1156. IFAAMAS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecht, S.V., Ramamoorthy, S.: On convergence and optimality of best-response learning with policy types in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 12–21 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albrecht, S., Crandall, J., Ramamoorthy, S.: Belief and truth in hypothesised behaviours. Artif. Intell. 235, 63–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.02.004

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Amin, K., Kearns, M., Key, P., Schwaighofer, A.: Budget optimization for sponsored search: censored learning in MDPs. In: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 54–63. AUAI Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amin, K., Rostamizadeh, A., Syed, U.: Learning prices for repeated auctions with strategic buyers. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1169–1177 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Fischer, P.: Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Mach. Learn. 47(2–3), 235–256 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett, S., Stone, P., Kraus, S.: Empirical evaluation of ad hoc teamwork in the pursuit domain. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 567–574. IFAAMAS (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cesa-Bianchi, N., Gentile, C., Mansour, Y.: Regret minimization for reserve prices in second-price auctions. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1190–1204. SIAM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cole, R., Roughgarden, T.: The sample complexity of revenue maximization. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 243–252. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Insights from buyers and sellers on the RTB opportunity. Forrester Consulting, commissioned by Google, White Paper (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ganchev, K., Nevmyvaka, Y., Kearns, M., Vaughan, J.W.: Censored exploration and the dark pool problem. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 185–194 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh, A., Rubinstein, B.I., Vassilvitskii, S., Zinkevich, M.: Adaptive bidding for display advertising. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 251–260. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, Z., Mansour, Y., Roughgarden, T.: Making the most of your samples. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 45–60. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53, 457–481 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohri, M., Medina, A.M.: Learning theory and algorithms for revenue optimization in second-price auctions with reserve. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 262–270 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muthukrishnan, S.: Ad exchanges: research issues. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10841-9_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pin, F., Key, P.: Stochastic variability in sponsored search auctions: observations and models. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 61–70. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schain, M., Mansour, Y.: Ad exchange – proposal for a new trading agent competition game. In: David, E., Kiekintveld, C., Robu, V., Shehory, O., Stein, S. (eds.) AMEC/TADA -2012. LNBIP, vol. 136, pp. 133–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40864-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone, P., Kaminka, G.A., Kraus, S., Rosenschein, J.S., et al.: Ad hoc autonomous agent teams: collaboration without pre-coordination. In: AAAI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 279–292 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stavros Gerakaris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gerakaris, S., Ramamoorthy, S. (2019). Learning Best Response Strategies for Agents in Ad Exchanges. In: Slavkovik, M. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14173-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14174-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics