Abstract
Ad exchanges are widely used in platforms for online display advertising. Autonomous agents operating in these exchanges must learn policies for interacting profitably with a diverse, continually changing, but unknown market. We consider this problem from the perspective of a publisher, strategically interacting with an advertiser through a posted price mechanism. The learning problem for this agent is made difficult by the fact that information is censored, i.e., the publisher knows if an impression is sold but no other quantitative information. We address this problem using the Harsanyi-Bellman Ad Hoc Coordination (HBA) algorithm [1, 3], which conceptualises this interaction in terms of a Stochastic Bayesian Game and arrives at optimal actions by best responding with respect to probabilistic beliefs maintained over a candidate set of opponent behaviour profiles. We adapt and apply HBA to the censored information setting of ad exchanges. Also, addressing the case of stochastic opponents, we devise a strategy based on a Kaplan-Meier estimator for opponent modelling. We evaluate the proposed method using simulations wherein we show that HBA-KM achieves substantially better competitive ratio and lower variance of return than baselines, including a Q-learning agent and a UCB-based online learning agent, and comparable to the offline optimal algorithm.
This work was partially supported from the Greek State Scholarship Foundation by the project “IKY Scholarship” from resources of ESF and ESPA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albrecht, S.V., Ramamoorthy, S.: A game-theoretic model and best-response learning method for ad hoc coordination in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1155–1156. IFAAMAS (2013)
Albrecht, S.V., Ramamoorthy, S.: On convergence and optimality of best-response learning with policy types in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 12–21 (2014)
Albrecht, S., Crandall, J., Ramamoorthy, S.: Belief and truth in hypothesised behaviours. Artif. Intell. 235, 63–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.02.004
Amin, K., Kearns, M., Key, P., Schwaighofer, A.: Budget optimization for sponsored search: censored learning in MDPs. In: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 54–63. AUAI Press (2012)
Amin, K., Rostamizadeh, A., Syed, U.: Learning prices for repeated auctions with strategic buyers. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1169–1177 (2013)
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Fischer, P.: Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Mach. Learn. 47(2–3), 235–256 (2002)
Barrett, S., Stone, P., Kraus, S.: Empirical evaluation of ad hoc teamwork in the pursuit domain. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 567–574. IFAAMAS (2011)
Cesa-Bianchi, N., Gentile, C., Mansour, Y.: Regret minimization for reserve prices in second-price auctions. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1190–1204. SIAM (2013)
Cole, R., Roughgarden, T.: The sample complexity of revenue maximization. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 243–252. ACM (2014)
Insights from buyers and sellers on the RTB opportunity. Forrester Consulting, commissioned by Google, White Paper (2011)
Ganchev, K., Nevmyvaka, Y., Kearns, M., Vaughan, J.W.: Censored exploration and the dark pool problem. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 185–194 (2009)
Ghosh, A., Rubinstein, B.I., Vassilvitskii, S., Zinkevich, M.: Adaptive bidding for display advertising. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 251–260. ACM (2009)
Huang, Z., Mansour, Y., Roughgarden, T.: Making the most of your samples. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 45–60. ACM (2015)
Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53, 457–481 (1958)
Mohri, M., Medina, A.M.: Learning theory and algorithms for revenue optimization in second-price auctions with reserve. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 262–270 (2014)
Muthukrishnan, S.: Ad exchanges: research issues. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10841-9_1
Pin, F., Key, P.: Stochastic variability in sponsored search auctions: observations and models. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 61–70. ACM (2011)
Schain, M., Mansour, Y.: Ad exchange – proposal for a new trading agent competition game. In: David, E., Kiekintveld, C., Robu, V., Shehory, O., Stein, S. (eds.) AMEC/TADA -2012. LNBIP, vol. 136, pp. 133–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40864-9_10
Stone, P., Kaminka, G.A., Kraus, S., Rosenschein, J.S., et al.: Ad hoc autonomous agent teams: collaboration without pre-coordination. In: AAAI (2010)
Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 279–292 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gerakaris, S., Ramamoorthy, S. (2019). Learning Best Response Strategies for Agents in Ad Exchanges. In: Slavkovik, M. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14173-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14174-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)