Skip to main content

Towards Fully Probabilistic Cooperative Decision Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11450))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 562 Accesses

Abstract

Modern prescriptive decision theories try to support the dynamic decision making (DM) in incompletely-known, stochastic, and complex environments. Distributed solutions single out as the only universal and scalable way to cope with DM complexity and with limited DM resources. They require a solid cooperation scheme, which harmonises disparate aims and abilities of involved agents (human decision makers, DM realising devices and their mixed groups). The paper outlines a distributed fully probabilistic DM. Its flat structuring enables a fully-scalable cooperative DM of adaptive and wise selfish agents. The paper elaborates the cooperation based on sharing and processing agents’ aims in the way, which negligibly increases agents’ deliberation effort, while preserving advantages of distributed DM. Simulation results indicate the strength of the approach and confirm the possibility of using an agent-specific feedback for controlling its cooperation.

Supported by GAČR, grant 16-09848S. This work was strongly influenced by the feedback provided to us by Dr. Tatiana V. Guy. We appreciate her insight and help.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The axiomatisation [19] also shows that any Bayesian DM formulation can be approximated by an FPD formulation to an arbitrary precision.

References

  1. Aknine, S., Caillou, P., Pinson, S.: Searching Pareto optimal solutions for the problem of forming and restructuring coalitions in multi-agent systems. Group Decis. Negot. 19, 7–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azizi, S., Quinn, A.: Hierarchical fully probabilistic design for deliberator-based merging in multiple participant systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. PP(99), 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2608662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barndorff-Nielsen, O.: Information and Exponential Families in Statistical Theory. Wiley, Hoboken (1978)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bond, A., Gasser, L.: Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, L., Pu, P.: Survey of preference elicitation methods. Technical report IC/2004/67, HCI Group Ecole Politechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daee, P., Peltola, T., Soare, M., Kaski, S.: Knowledge elicitation via sequential probabilistic inference for high-dimensional prediction. Mach. Learn. 106(9), 1599–1620 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. DeGroot, M.: Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw-Hill, New York City (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Genest, C., Zidek, J.: Combining probability distributions: a critique and annotated bibliography. Stat. Sci. 1(1), 114–148 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Guan, P., Raginsky, M., Willett, R.: Online Markov decision processes with Kullback Leibler control cost. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 59(6), 1423–1438 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Harsanyi, J.: Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players. I-III. Management Science 50(Suppl. 12), 1763–1893 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kárný, M.: Adaptive systems: local approximators? In: Workshop on Adaptive Systems in Control and Signal Processing, pp. 129–134. IFAC, Glasgow (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kárný, M.: Recursive estimation of high-order Markov chains: approximation by finite mixtures. Inf. Sci. 326, 188–201 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kárný, M.: Implementable prescriptive decision making. In: Guy, T., Kárný, M., D., D.R.I., Wolpert, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 Workshop on Imperfect Decision Makers, vol. 58, pp. 19–30. JMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kárný, M., et al.: Optimized Bayesian Dynamic Advising: Theory and Algorithms. Springer, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kárný, M., Guy, T.V.: Fully probabilistic control design. Syst. Control Lett. 55(4), 259–265 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kárný, M., Guy, T.V., Bodini, A., Ruggeri, F.: Cooperation via sharing of probabilistic information. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Stud. 1, 139–162 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kárný, M., Guy, T.: On support of imperfect Bayesian participants. In: Guy, T., et al. (eds.) Decision Making with Imperfect Decision Makers. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 28, pp. 29–56. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24647-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kárný, M., Herzallah, R.: Scalable harmonization of complex networks with local adaptive controllers. IEEE Trans. SMC: Syst. 47(3), 394–404 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kárný, M., Kroupa, T.: Axiomatisation of fully probabilistic design. Inf. Sci. 186(1), 105–113 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulhavý, R., Zarrop, M.B.: On a general concept of forgetting. Int. J. Control 58(4), 905–924 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Kullback, S., Leibler, R.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79–87 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewicki, R., Weiss, S., Lewin, D.: Models of conflict, negotiation and 3rd party intervention - a review and synthesis. J. Organ. Behav. 13(3), 209–252 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mattingley, J., Wang, Y., Boyd, S.: Receding horizon control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 31(3), 52–65 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Mayne, D.: Model predictive control: recent developments and future promise. Automatica 50, 2967–2986 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Mine, H., Osaki, S.: Markovian Decision Processes. Elsevier, New York (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelsen, R.: An Introduction to Copulas. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Nurmi, H.: Resolving group choice paradoxes using probabilistic and fuzzy concepts. Group Decis. Negot. 10, 177–198 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peterka, V.: Bayesian system identification. In: Eykhoff, P. (ed.) Trends and Progress in System Identification, pp. 239–304. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1981)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Savage, L.: Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Sečkárová, V.: Cross-entropy based combination of discrete probability distributions for distributed decision making. Ph.D. thesis, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics., Prague (2015). Submitted in May 2015. Successfully defended on 14 September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sečkárová, V.: Weighted probabilistic opinion pooling based on cross-entropy. In: Arik, S., Huang, T., Lai, W.K., Liu, Q. (eds.) ICONIP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9490, pp. 623–629. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26535-3_71

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Sečkárová, V.: On supra-Bayesian weighted combination of available data determined by Kerridge inaccuracy and entropy. Pliska Stud. Math. Bulgar. 22, 159–168 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Shore, J., Johnson, R.: Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 26(1), 26–37 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Simpson, E.: Combined decision making with multiple agents. Ph.D. thesis, Hertford College, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Simpson, E., Roberts, S., Psorakis, I., Smith, A.: Dynamic Bayesian combination of multiple imperfect classifiers. In: Guy, T., Kárný, M., Wolpert, D. (eds.) Decision Making and Imperfection. Studies in Computation Intelligence, vol. 474, pp. 1–35. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36406-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Todorov, E.: Linearly-solvable Markov decision problems. In: Schölkopf, B., et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing, pp. 1369–1376. MIT Press, NY (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Šindelář, J., Vajda, I., Kárný, M.: Stochastic control optimal in the Kullback sense. Kybernetika 44(1), 53–60 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Wald, A.: Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley, London (1950)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Wallenius, J., Dyer, J., Fishburn, P., Steuer, R., Zionts, S., Deb, K.: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manag. Sci. 54(7), 1336–1349 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zlotkin, G., Rosenschein, J.: Mechanism design for automated negotiation and its applicatin to task oriented domains. Artif. Intell. 86, 195–244 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslav Kárný .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kárný, M., Alizadeh, Z. (2019). Towards Fully Probabilistic Cooperative Decision Making. In: Slavkovik, M. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14173-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14174-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics