Abstract
Modern prescriptive decision theories try to support the dynamic decision making (DM) in incompletely-known, stochastic, and complex environments. Distributed solutions single out as the only universal and scalable way to cope with DM complexity and with limited DM resources. They require a solid cooperation scheme, which harmonises disparate aims and abilities of involved agents (human decision makers, DM realising devices and their mixed groups). The paper outlines a distributed fully probabilistic DM. Its flat structuring enables a fully-scalable cooperative DM of adaptive and wise selfish agents. The paper elaborates the cooperation based on sharing and processing agents’ aims in the way, which negligibly increases agents’ deliberation effort, while preserving advantages of distributed DM. Simulation results indicate the strength of the approach and confirm the possibility of using an agent-specific feedback for controlling its cooperation.
Supported by GAČR, grant 16-09848S. This work was strongly influenced by the feedback provided to us by Dr. Tatiana V. Guy. We appreciate her insight and help.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The axiomatisation [19] also shows that any Bayesian DM formulation can be approximated by an FPD formulation to an arbitrary precision.
References
Aknine, S., Caillou, P., Pinson, S.: Searching Pareto optimal solutions for the problem of forming and restructuring coalitions in multi-agent systems. Group Decis. Negot. 19, 7–37 (2010)
Azizi, S., Quinn, A.: Hierarchical fully probabilistic design for deliberator-based merging in multiple participant systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. PP(99), 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2608662
Barndorff-Nielsen, O.: Information and Exponential Families in Statistical Theory. Wiley, Hoboken (1978)
Bond, A., Gasser, L.: Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2014)
Chen, L., Pu, P.: Survey of preference elicitation methods. Technical report IC/2004/67, HCI Group Ecole Politechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland (2004)
Daee, P., Peltola, T., Soare, M., Kaski, S.: Knowledge elicitation via sequential probabilistic inference for high-dimensional prediction. Mach. Learn. 106(9), 1599–1620 (2017)
DeGroot, M.: Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw-Hill, New York City (1970)
Genest, C., Zidek, J.: Combining probability distributions: a critique and annotated bibliography. Stat. Sci. 1(1), 114–148 (1986)
Guan, P., Raginsky, M., Willett, R.: Online Markov decision processes with Kullback Leibler control cost. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 59(6), 1423–1438 (2014)
Harsanyi, J.: Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players. I-III. Management Science 50(Suppl. 12), 1763–1893 (2004)
Kárný, M.: Adaptive systems: local approximators? In: Workshop on Adaptive Systems in Control and Signal Processing, pp. 129–134. IFAC, Glasgow (1998)
Kárný, M.: Recursive estimation of high-order Markov chains: approximation by finite mixtures. Inf. Sci. 326, 188–201 (2016)
Kárný, M.: Implementable prescriptive decision making. In: Guy, T., Kárný, M., D., D.R.I., Wolpert, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 Workshop on Imperfect Decision Makers, vol. 58, pp. 19–30. JMLR (2017)
Kárný, M., et al.: Optimized Bayesian Dynamic Advising: Theory and Algorithms. Springer, London (2006)
Kárný, M., Guy, T.V.: Fully probabilistic control design. Syst. Control Lett. 55(4), 259–265 (2006)
Kárný, M., Guy, T.V., Bodini, A., Ruggeri, F.: Cooperation via sharing of probabilistic information. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Stud. 1, 139–162 (2009)
Kárný, M., Guy, T.: On support of imperfect Bayesian participants. In: Guy, T., et al. (eds.) Decision Making with Imperfect Decision Makers. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 28, pp. 29–56. Springer, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24647-0_2
Kárný, M., Herzallah, R.: Scalable harmonization of complex networks with local adaptive controllers. IEEE Trans. SMC: Syst. 47(3), 394–404 (2017)
Kárný, M., Kroupa, T.: Axiomatisation of fully probabilistic design. Inf. Sci. 186(1), 105–113 (2012)
Kulhavý, R., Zarrop, M.B.: On a general concept of forgetting. Int. J. Control 58(4), 905–924 (1993)
Kullback, S., Leibler, R.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79–87 (1951)
Lewicki, R., Weiss, S., Lewin, D.: Models of conflict, negotiation and 3rd party intervention - a review and synthesis. J. Organ. Behav. 13(3), 209–252 (1992)
Mattingley, J., Wang, Y., Boyd, S.: Receding horizon control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 31(3), 52–65 (2011)
Mayne, D.: Model predictive control: recent developments and future promise. Automatica 50, 2967–2986 (2014)
Mine, H., Osaki, S.: Markovian Decision Processes. Elsevier, New York (1970)
Nelsen, R.: An Introduction to Copulas. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0
Nurmi, H.: Resolving group choice paradoxes using probabilistic and fuzzy concepts. Group Decis. Negot. 10, 177–198 (2001)
Peterka, V.: Bayesian system identification. In: Eykhoff, P. (ed.) Trends and Progress in System Identification, pp. 239–304. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1981)
Savage, L.: Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken (1954)
Sečkárová, V.: Cross-entropy based combination of discrete probability distributions for distributed decision making. Ph.D. thesis, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics., Prague (2015). Submitted in May 2015. Successfully defended on 14 September 2015
Sečkárová, V.: Weighted probabilistic opinion pooling based on cross-entropy. In: Arik, S., Huang, T., Lai, W.K., Liu, Q. (eds.) ICONIP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9490, pp. 623–629. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26535-3_71
Sečkárová, V.: On supra-Bayesian weighted combination of available data determined by Kerridge inaccuracy and entropy. Pliska Stud. Math. Bulgar. 22, 159–168 (2013)
Shore, J., Johnson, R.: Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 26(1), 26–37 (1980)
Simpson, E.: Combined decision making with multiple agents. Ph.D. thesis, Hertford College, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford (2014)
Simpson, E., Roberts, S., Psorakis, I., Smith, A.: Dynamic Bayesian combination of multiple imperfect classifiers. In: Guy, T., Kárný, M., Wolpert, D. (eds.) Decision Making and Imperfection. Studies in Computation Intelligence, vol. 474, pp. 1–35. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36406-8_1
Todorov, E.: Linearly-solvable Markov decision problems. In: Schölkopf, B., et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing, pp. 1369–1376. MIT Press, NY (2006)
Šindelář, J., Vajda, I., Kárný, M.: Stochastic control optimal in the Kullback sense. Kybernetika 44(1), 53–60 (2008)
Wald, A.: Statistical Decision Functions. Wiley, London (1950)
Wallenius, J., Dyer, J., Fishburn, P., Steuer, R., Zionts, S., Deb, K.: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manag. Sci. 54(7), 1336–1349 (2008)
Zlotkin, G., Rosenschein, J.: Mechanism design for automated negotiation and its applicatin to task oriented domains. Artif. Intell. 86, 195–244 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kárný, M., Alizadeh, Z. (2019). Towards Fully Probabilistic Cooperative Decision Making. In: Slavkovik, M. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14173-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14174-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)