Skip to main content

Temporal Epistemic Gossip Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11450))

Abstract

Gossip problems are planning problems where several agents have to share information (‘secrets’) by means of phone calls between two agents. In epistemic gossip problems the goal can be to achieve higher-order knowledge, i.e., knowledge about other agents’ knowledge; to that end, in a call agents communicate not only secrets, but also agents’ knowledge of secrets, agents’ knowledge about other agents’ knowledge about secrets, etc. Temporal epistemic gossip problems moreover impose constraints on the times of calls. These constraints are of two kinds: either they stipulate that a call between two agents must necessarily be made at some time point, or they stipulate that a call can be made within some possible (set of) interval(s). In the non-temporal version, calls between two agents are either always possible or always impossible. We investigate the complexity of the plan existence problem in this general setting. Concerning the upper bound, we prove that it is in NP in the general case, and that it is in P when the problem is non-temporal and the goal is a positive epistemic formula. As for the lower bound, we prove NP-completeness for two fragments: problems with possibly negative goals even in the non-temporal case, and problems with temporal constraints even if the goal is a set of positive atoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    More generally, the caller’s knowledge becomes common knowledge between i and j. We however have no common knowledge operator in our framework.

References

  1. Apt, K.R., Grossi, D., van der Hoek, W.: Epistemic protocols for distributed gossiping. In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015. EPTCS, vol. 215, pp. 51–66 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.215.5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Apt, K.R., Grossi, D., van der Hoek, W.: When are two gossips the same? Types of communication in epistemic gossip protocols. CoRR abs/1807.05283 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.05283

  3. Apt, K.R., Kopczynski, E., Wojtczak, D.: On the computational complexity of gossip protocols. In: Sierra, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2017, pp. 765–771. ijcai.org (2017). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/106

  4. Apt, K.R., Wojtczak, D.: Common knowledge in a logic of gossips. In: Lang, J. (ed.) Proceedings Sixteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2017. EPTCS, vol. 251, pp. 10–27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.251.2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Apt, K.R., Wojtczak, D.: Decidability of fair termination of gossip protocols. In: Eiter, T., Sands, D., Sutcliffe, G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) IWIL@LPAR 2017 Workshop and LPAR-21 Short Presentations, vol. 1. Kalpa Publications in Computing, EasyChair (2017). http://www.easychair.org/publications/paper/342983

  6. Attamah, M., van Ditmarsch, H., Grossi, D., van der Hoek, W.: A framework for epistemic gossip protocols. In: Bulling, N. (ed.) EUMAS 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8953, pp. 193–209. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17130-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Aucher, G., Bolander, T.: Undecidability in epistemic planning. In: Rossi, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2013, 3–9 August 2013, Beijing, China, pp. 27–33. IJCAI/AAAI (2013). http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/IJCAI/IJCAI13/paper/view/6903

  8. Bolander, T., Andersen, M.B.: Epistemic planning for single and multi-agent systems. J. Appl. Non-Classical Logics 21(1), 9–34 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3166/jancl.21.9-34

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bylander, T.: The computational complexity of propositional STRIPS planning. Artif. Intell. 69(1–2), 165–204 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90081-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper, M.C., Herzig, A., Maffre, F., Maris, F., Régnier, P.: A simple account of multi-agent epistemic planning. In: Kaminka et al. [19], pp. 193–201. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-193

  11. Cooper, M.C., Herzig, A., Maffre, F., Maris, F., Régnier, P.: Simple epistemic planning: generalised gossiping. In: Kaminka et al. [19], pp. 1563–1564. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1563

  12. Cooper, M.C., Herzig, A., Maffre, F., Maris, F., Régnier, P.: Simple epistemic planning: generalised gossiping. CoRR abs/1606.03244 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03244

  13. Cooper, M.C., Maris, F., Régnier, P.: Monotone temporal planning: tractability, extensions and applications. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 50, 447–485 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4358

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. van Ditmarsch, H., van Eijck, J., Pardo, P., Ramezanian, R., Schwarzentruber, F.: Epistemic protocols for dynamic gossip. J. Appl. Logic 20, 1–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2016.12.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. van Ditmarsch, H., Grossi, D., Herzig, A., van der Hoek, W., Kuijer, L.B.: Parameters for epistemic gossip problems. In: Proceedings of LOFT 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hedetniemi, S.M., Hedetniemi, S.T., Liestman, A.L.: A survey of gossiping and broadcasting in communication networks. Networks 18(4), 319–349 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1002/net.3230180406

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Herzig, A., Lorini, E., Maffre, F.: A poor man’s epistemic logic based on propositional assignment and higher-order observation. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W.H., Wang, W. (eds.) LORI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9394, pp. 156–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Herzig, A., Maffre, F.: How to share knowledge by gossiping. AI Commun. 30(1), 1–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-170723

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaminka, G.A., et al. (eds.): 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, ECAI 2016, vol. 285. IOS Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Löwe, B., Pacuit, E., Witzel, A.: DEL planning and some tractable cases. In: van Ditmarsch, H., Lang, J., Ju, S. (eds.) LORI 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6953, pp. 179–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24130-7_13

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Maffre, F.: Ignorance is bliss: observability-based dynamic epistemic logics and their applications. Ph.D. thesis, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France (2016). https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01488408

  22. Muise, C.J., et al.: Planning over multi-agent epistemic states: a classical planning approach. In: Bonet, B., Koenig, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 25–30 January 2015, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 3327–3334. AAAI Press (2015). http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI15/paper/view/9974

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin C. Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cooper, M.C., Herzig, A., Maris, F., Vianey, J. (2019). Temporal Epistemic Gossip Problems. In: Slavkovik, M. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems. EUMAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14173-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14174-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics