Abstract
In this chapter we present how Sweden has conceptualized patient-, citizen- and carer- engagement and participation at different levels: (a) in formulating policy for health and healthcare, (b) in decisions and planning the overall structure of a healthcare system, including the siting of services, (c) in designing the organization of care at a service level, (d) in planning and taking part in their own individual care and (e) in providing information about outcomes of care and experiences of care. The model is based on co-care and enables self-care to reduce the widening gaps between needs and supply and between cost and affordability. It also mobilizes certain changes and more use of modern change sciences to help to move healthcare towards the more person-centred services represented by self-care and co-care approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Reproduced with permission from Eskil Degsell
References
AHRQ. 2017. Tool 1D: Business Case Form, from https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/fallpxtoolkit/fallpxtk-tool1d.html. Accessed 18 Feb 2018.
———. 2018. Return on Investment Estimation, (in Toolkit for Using the AHRQ Quality Indicators). https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/hospital/qitoolkit/pdi/f1_pdi_returnoninvestment.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2018.
Alexander, J.A., L.R. Hearld, J.N. Mittler, and J. Harvey. 2012. Patient–physician role relationships and patient activation among individuals with chronic illness. Health Services Research 47: 1201–1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01354.x.
Batalden, P.B., and P.K. Stoltz. 1993. A framework for the continual improvement of health care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 19: 424–452.
Da Silva, D. 2012. Helping people share decision a review of evidence considering whether shared decision making is worthwhile. London: The Health Foundation.
Degsell, E. 2018. A model for co-care and the learning health system, available from Eskil Degsell, Patient representative for liaison co-care and patient centred care and researcher. LIME/MMC, Tomtebodavägen 18A. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden.
Degsell, E., and Øvretveit. 2018. Patient evaluation of co-care survey (PECS). Available from MMC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Docteur, E., and A. Coulter. 2012. Patient-centeredness in Sweden’s health system—An external assessment and six steps for progress. Stockholm: Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services (Vårdanalys).
Fallberg, L., and J. Øvretveit. 2003. Introduction to patient ombudsmen schemes in Europe. Chap. 1 in Protecting Patient’s Rights?, ed. S. Mackenney and L. Fallberg. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.
Frampton, S.B., S. Guastello, L. Hoy, M. Naylor, S. Sheridan, and M. Johnston-Fleece. 2016. Harnessing evidence and experience to change culture: A guiding framework for patient and family engaged care. Discussion Paper, National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC. https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Harnessing-Evidence-and-Experience-to-Change-Culture-A-Guiding-Framework-for-Patient-and-Family-Engaged-Care. pdf.
Fumagalli, L.P., G. Radaelli, E. Lettieri, P. Bertele’, and C. Masella. 2015. Patient empowerment and its neighbours: Clarifying the boundaries and their mutual relationships. Health Policy 119: 384–394.
Genia. 2018. Bromma, Sweden. http://www.genia.se/homepage/. Accessed 16 May 2018.
Hibbard, J.H., and E. Mahoney. 2010. Toward a theory of patient and consumer activation. Patient Education and Counseling 78 (3): 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
Hvitfeldt, H., C.A. Carli, E.C. Nelson, et al. 2009. Feed-forward systems for patient participation and provider support: Adoption results from the original US context to Sweden and beyond. Quality Management in Health Care 18: 247–256.
INVOLVE. 2012. INVOLVE: Briefing notes for researchers: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. National Institute for Health Research, Hamphire UK, February. www.involve.nihr.ac.uk. Accessed 1 June 2018.
Kent, D.M., and R.A. Hayward. 2007. Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to Langley G, Nolan K, Nolan T, Norman C, Provost L. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
Langley, G.J., K.M. Nolan, T.W. Nolan, et al. 1996. The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lima, A., et al. 2016. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve diabetes self-management on clinical outcomes in patients with low educational level. Gaceta Sanitaria 2017 31 (1): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.05.017.
Longtin, Y., H. Sax, L. Leape, S. Sheridan, L. Donaldson, and D. Pittet. 2010. Patient participation: Current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 85 (1): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2009.0248.
Michie, S., M. Richardson, M. Johnston, C. Abraham, J. Francis, W. Hardeman, M.P. Eccles, J. Cane, and C.E. Wood. 2013. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 46 (1): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
Nelson, E.C., M. Dixon-Woods, P.B. Batalden, K. Homa, A.D. Van Citters, T.S. Morgan, E. Eftimovska, E.S. Fisher, J. Ovretveit, W. Harrison, C. Lind, and S. Lindblad. 2016. Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science. BMJ 354: i3319. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3319. (Published 1 July 2016).
Norman, N., and K. Eva. 2010. Diagnostic error in clinical reasoning. Medical Education 44: 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03507.x.
OECD/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2017. Sweden: Country Health Profile 2017, State of Health in the EU, OECD Publishing, Paris/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264283572-en.
Øvretveit, J. 2009. Does improving quality save money? A review of evidence of which improvement to quality reduce costs for health service providers. London: The Health Foundation. www.health.org.uk; http://www.health.org.uk/publication/does-improving-quality-save-money.
———. 2012. Do changes to patient-provider relationships improve quality and save money? A review of evidence. London: The Health Foundation. http://www.health.org.uk/publications/do-changes-to-patient-provider-relationships-improve-quality-and-save-money/.
———. 2017. Digital technologies supporting person-Centered integrated care. International Journal of Integrated Care 17 (4): 6. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3051.
Øvretveit, J., C. Keller, H. Hvitfeldt Forsberg, A. Essén, S. Lindblad, and M. Brommels. 2013. Continuous innovation: The development and use of the Swedish rheumatology register to improve the quality of arthritis care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 25 (2): 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt002.
Øvretveit, J., L. Zubkoff, E. Nelson, S. Frampton, J. Lehmann Knudsen, and E. Zimlichman. 2017. Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 29 (6): 874–879.
Parkwell. 2018. https://www.openratio.com/category/enterprise-mobility/page/2/. Accessed 16 May 2018.
Patients like me. 2018. A chance to change the future of personalized health. https://www.patientslikeme.com/. Accessed 11 May 2018.
Powell, B., T. Waltz, M. Chinman, L. Damschroder, J. Smith, M. Matthieu, E. Proctor, and J. Kirchner. 2015. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science 10: 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.
Recovery college. 2018. The power of peer support at the Severn & Wye Recovery College. https://www.health.org.uk/content/power-peer-support-severn-wye-recovery-college. Accessed 16 May 2018.
RWJF. 2018. Building a Culture of Health, from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. https://www.rwjf.org/en/how-we-work/building-a-culture-of-health.html. Accessed 1 June 2018.
Sabadosa, K.A., and P.B. Batalden. 2014. The interdependent roles of patients, families and professionals in cystic fibrosis: A system for the coproduction of healthcare and its improvement. BMJ Quality and Safety 23: i90–i94.
Sullivan, S., J. Mauskopf, F. Augustovski, J. Caro, K. Lee, M. Minchin, E. Orlewska, P. Penna, J. Barrios, and W. Shau. 2014. 2012 budget impact analysis—Principles of good practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 budget impact analysis good practice II task force. Value in Health 17: 5–14.
Vahdat, S., L. Hamzehgardeshi, S. Hessam, and Z. Hamzehgardeshi. 2014. Patient involvement in health care decision making: A review. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 16 (1): e12454. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.12454. Published online 2014 Jan 5.
Vardanalysis. 2017. From the patient’s perspective. Stockholm. https://www.vardanalys.se/rapporter/varden-ur-patienternas-perspektiv-65-ar-och-aldre/. Accessed 1 June 2018.
Ziebland, S., A. Coulter, J. Calabrese, and L. Locock, eds. 2013. Understanding and using health experiences: Improving patient care. Oxford: Oxford university press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 4.1: Definitions
Appendix 4.2: Patient Evaluation of Co-Care Survey (PECS) (Degsell and Øvretveit 2018)
-
1.
Does your illness make everyday activities more difficult?
(0 not at all, 1 a little, 2 yes but no major difficulties, 3 yes quite difficult, 4 yes very difficult, 5 yes because of my illness it is impossible to perform many activities important to me).
-
2.
Has any care provider asked you which activities your disease makes difficult for you to carry out?
(2 yes, 1 no, 0 don’t know)
-
3.
If yes to 2) have they asked you whatyouwant the treatment or care to help you to do, or what you want the goals of treatment or care to be?
(2 yes, 1 no, 0 don’t know)
-
4.
If yes to 3) or 2) how much do you think they considered your views about which activities your disease makes difficult, when they were advising you about your treatment and care?
(0 not at all, 1 they know but do not seem to have considered this, 2 they have taken this into consideration a little, 3 they are very good at discussing which treatment and care choices are best for helping with different activities that are important to me)
-
5.
Have they asked you what you are doing yourself to make living with your illness less difficult?
(2 yes, 1 no, 0 don’t know)
-
6.
If yes to 2 or 3, have they discussed with you what you could do yourself so as to be able to carry out activities important to you which your illness is making more difficult?
(0 not at all, 1 they suggested some things but did not discuss how I could arrange my life differently to be able to do these things, 2 they suggested some things and we discussed how I could arrange my life differently to be able to do these things)
-
7.
Have you discussed with other patients what they do themselves to be able to carry out activities important to them which their illness is making more difficult?
(2 yes, 1 no, 0 don’t know)
-
8.
Have healthcare or other services made it possible to meet with other patients to share and discuss what they do themselves to carry out activities important to them which their illness is making more difficult?
(2 yes, 1 no, 0 don’t know, 3 not healthcare but other services)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Øvretveit, J., Degsell, E. (2019). Implementing Patient and Carer Participation in Self-Care and Co-Care in Sweden: Policy, Practice and the Future of Person-Centred Care. In: Pomey, MP., Denis, JL., Dumez, V. (eds) Patient Engagement. Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14101-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14101-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14100-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14101-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)