Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Big Data ((SBD,volume 56))

Abstract

In the previous chapters, various types of splitting criteria were proposed. Each of the presented criteria is constructed using one specific impurity measure (or, more precisely, the corresponding split measure function). Therefore we will refer to such criteria as ‘single’ splitting criteria. The experiments conducted in Chap. 5 demonstrate that various single splitting criteria have their own advantages and drawbacks. Based on this observation a new kind of splitting criteria can be proposed, which combine together two different single criteria in a heuristic manner. We refer to them as hybrid splitting criteria. In this chapter, we discuss premises which demonstrate that such an approach may lead to satisfactory results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wozniak, M.: Hybrid Classifiers: Methods of Data, Knowledge, and Classifier Combination. Springer Publishing Company, Berlin (2013). Incorporated

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woźniak, M., Grana, M., Corchado, E.: A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems. Inf. Fusion 16, 3–17 (2014). Special Issue on Information Fusion in Hybrid Intelligent Fusion Systems

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gogte, P.S., Theng, D.P.: Hybrid ensemble classifier for stream data. In: 2014 Fourth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, April 2014, pp. 463–467 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, H., Madhvanath, S., Sun, T.: Hybrid active learning for non-stationary streaming data with asynchronous labeling. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), October 2015, pp. 287–292 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, K., Hong, J.-S.: A hybrid decision tree algorithm for mixed numeric and categorical data in regression analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 98, 39–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, H.M., Wang, H.C., Chang, Y.C., Chai, J.W., Chen, C.C.C., Hung, C.L., Chang, C.I.: A supervised hybrid classifier for brain tissues and white matter lesions on multispectral MRI. In: 2017 14th International Symposium on Pervasive Systems, Algorithms and Networks, 2017 11th International Conference on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology, 2017 Third International Symposium of Creative Computing (ISPAN-FCST-ISCC), June 2017, pp. 375–379 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Datta, S., Dev, V.A., Eden, M.R.: Hybrid genetic algorithm-decision tree approach for rate constant prediction using structures of reactants and solvent for Diels-Alder reaction. Comput. Chem. Eng. 106, 690–698 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, Z.-H., Chen, Z.-Q.: Hybrid decision tree. Knowl. Based Syst. 15(8), 515–528 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gama, J.: Accurate decision trees for mining high-speed data streams. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 523–528. ACM Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farid, D.M., Zhang, L., Mofizur Rahman, C., Hossain, M.A., Strachan, R.: Hybrid decision tree and naive Bayes classifiers for multi-class classification tasks. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(4), Part 2, 1937–1946 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rutkowski, L., Jaworski, M., Pietruczuk, L., Duda, P.: A new method for data stream mining based on the misclassification error. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 26(5), 1048–1059 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaworski, M., Rutkowski, L., Pawlak, M.: Hybrid splitting criterion in decision trees for data stream mining. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, pp. 60–72. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaworski, M., Duda, P., Rutkowski, L.: New splitting criteria for decision trees in stationary data streams. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 29, 2516–2529 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, F., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Du, C., Xu, Y., Tian, Y.-C.: Cost-sensitive and hybrid-attribute measure multi-decision tree over imbalanced data sets. Inf. Sci. 422, 242–256 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Domingos, P., Hulten, G.: Mining high-speed data streams. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 71–80 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leszek Rutkowski .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rutkowski, L., Jaworski, M., Duda, P. (2020). Hybrid Splitting Criteria. In: Stream Data Mining: Algorithms and Their Probabilistic Properties. Studies in Big Data, vol 56. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13962-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics