Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Craft as Critique in Experimental Animation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Crafty Animator

Part of the book series: Palgrave Animation ((PAANI))

Abstract

As a moving image art form, experimental animation blurs the boundaries between art and craft, intangibility and materiality, conceptualism and sensuousness in wide-ranging and thought-provoking ways. This chapter considers experimental animation alongside the concerns of craft as a physical, artistic and critical practice. It focuses in particular on issues of (im)materiality, the act of making and the significance of skill—the last of these especially as it relates to what craft theorists call “sloppy craft” (Wilson 2015, xxiv), or the purposeful application of imperfect technique as a subversive practice and form of social critique. Drawing from art history and craft theory, the chapter reveals some of the complex ways that craft undergirds and shapes our understanding of experimental animation as an art form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, Glenn. 2007. Thinking Through Craft. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adamson, Glenn. 2010. “Introduction.” In The Craft Reader, edited by Glenn Adamson, 1–5. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsom, Erika. 2017. “Against the Novelty of New Media: The Resuscitation of the Authentic.” In You Are Here: Art After the Internet, edited by Omar Kholeif, 66–77. Manchester and London: HOME and SPACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Gregory. 2019. “Gregory Bennett.” In Experimental Animation: From Analogue to Digital, edited by Miriam Harris, Lilly Husbands, and Paul Taberham, 267–270. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt, Michael. 2013. The History of Motion Graphics: From Avant-Garde to Industry in the United States. Rockville, MD: Wildside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, Suzanne. 2007. “Oscillating at the ‘High/Low’ Art Divide: Curating and Exhibiting Animation.” In Issues in Curating Contemporary Art and Performance, edited by Judith Rugg and Michèle Sedgwick, 131–146. Bristol: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deren, Maya. 2015. “Amateur Versus Professional.” In Alternative Projections: Experimental Film in Los Angeles, 1945–1980, edited by David E. James and Adam Hyman, 39–40. New Barnet: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Failes, Ian. 2017. “The Beautiful Side of ‘Ugly’: How a Film Embraced Errors and Happy Accidents in CG.” Cartoon Brew. May 12. Accessed May 25, 2018. https://www.cartoonbrew.com/shorts/beautiful-side-ugly-film-embraced-errors-happy-accidents-cg-149823.html.

  • Fariello, M. Anna. 2011. “Making and Naming: The Lexicon of Studio Craft.” In Extra/Ordinary: Craft and Contemporary Art, edited by Maria Elena Buszek, 23–42. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Furniss, Maureen. 2007. Art in Motion: Animation Aesthetics. Revised edition. New Barnet: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gere, Charlie. 2008. Digital Culture. Second edition. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, George. 2007. “Concrete Animation.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2 (3): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, George. 2009. “Cartoon, Anti-Cartoon.” In Animation: Art & Industry, edited by Maureen Furniss, 189–198. New Barnet: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, Melissa. 2017. Contemporary Art and Digital Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, Tom. 1989–1990. “Towards a Minor Cinema: Fonoroff, Herwitz, Awesh, Lapore, Klahr and Solomon.” Motion Picture 3 (1–2): 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Miriam. 2019. “Digital Experimentation: Extending Animation’s Expressive Vocabulary.” In Experimental Animation: From Analogue to Digital, edited by Miriam Harris, Lilly Husbands, and Paul Taberham, 114–131. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hosea, Birgitta. 2010. “Drawing Animation.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5 (3): 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husbands, Lilly. 2014. “Animated Experientia: Aesthetics of Contemporary Experimental Animation.” Ph.D. dissertation, King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husbands, Lilly. 2019. “The ‘Quasi-Artistic Venture’: MTV Idents and Alternative Animation Culture.” In Animation and Advertising, edited by Malcolm Cook and Kirstin Thompson, forthcoming. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, Love. 2007. “Rethinking Dichotomies: Crafts and the Digital.” In NeoCraft: Modernity and the Crafts, edited by Sandra Alfoldy, 240–248. Halifax: The Press of the Nova Scotia School of Art and Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugh, Michele. 2014. “Joy in Labour: The Politicization of Craft from the Arts and Crafts Movement to Etsy.” Canadian Review of American Studies 44 (2): 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longchamps, Denis. 2015. “An Impression of déjà vu: Craft, the Visual Arts, and the Need to Get Sloppy.” In Sloppy Craft: Postdisciplinarity and the Crafts, edited by Elaine Cheasley Paterson and Susan Surette, 61–78. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Jodie. 2019. “Jodie Mack.” In Experimental Animation: From Analogue to Digital, edited by Miriam Harris, Lilly Husbands, and Paul Taberham, 153–157. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazanti, Louise. 2011. “Super-Objects: Craft as an Aesthetic Position.” In Extra/Ordinary: Craft and Contemporary Art, edited by Maria Elena Buszek, 59–82. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, Malcolm. 1998. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, Jason. 2003. “The Great Saturday Morning Exile: Scheduling Cartoons on Television’s Periphery in the 1960s.” In Prime Time Animation: Television Animation and American Culture, edited by Carol A. Stabile and Mark Harrison, 33–54. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, William. 1997. “Digital Harmony: The Life of John Whitney, Computer Animation Pioneer.” Animation World Magazine, Issue 2.5 (August). Accessed May 25, 2018. https://www.awn.com/mag/issue2.5/2.5pages/2.5moritzwhitney.html.

  • Moritz, William. 2004. Optical Poetry: The Life and Work of Oskar Fischinger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, David. 2009. “Basic Animation Aesthetics.” Davidoreilly.com. Accessed June 1, 2018. http://www.davidoreilly.com/downloads/.

  • Paterson, Elaine Cheasley, and Susan Surette. 2015. “Introduction.” In Sloppy Craft: Postdisciplinarity and the Crafts, edited by Elaine Cheasley Paterson and Susan Surette, 1–25. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, James. 1994. Dreams of Chaos, Visions of Order: Understanding the American Avant-Garde. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Pat. 2009. “Animated Expressions: Expressive Style in 3D Computer Graphic Narrative Animation.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4 (2): 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, Kathryn. 2016. Experimental Filmmaking: Break the Machine. London: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Lacey Jane. 2011. “Put Your Thing Down, Flip It, and Reverse It: Reimagining Craft Identities Using Tactics of Queer Theory.” In Extra/Ordinary: Craft and Contemporary Art, edited by Maria Elena Buszek, 243–259. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, John. 2007. The Intangibilities of Form: Skill and Deskilling in Art After the Readymade. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. “Art After Deskilling.” Historical Materialism 18: 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, Robert, and Cecile Starr. 1988. Experimental Animation: Origins of a New Art. New York: Da Capo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, Robert. 2009. Hyperanimation: Digital Images and Virtual Worlds. Herts: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrat, Sara Álvarez, and María Lorenzo Hernández. 2013. “How Computers Re-Animated Hand-Made Processes and Aesthetics for Artistic Animation.” Animation Studies Online Journal 7. January 23. Accessed May 25, 2018. https://journal.animationstudies.org/sara-alvarez-sarrat-and-maria-lorenzo-hernandez-how-computers-re-animated-hand-made-processes-and-aesthetics-for-artistic-animation-2/.

  • Shapiro, Miriam, and Melissa Meyer. 1977–1978. “Waste Not/Want Not: An Enquiry into What Women Saved and Assembled—Femmage.” Heresies I (4): 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Vicky. 2015. “The Animator’s Body in Expanded Cinema.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 10 (3): 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snoad, Laura. 2018. “Nikita Diakur’s Chaotic Animations Are a Gross Study in Dynamic Computer Simulation.” It’s Nice That. May 1. Accessed 1 June 2018. https://www.itsnicethat.com/articles/nikita-diakurs-ugly-animation-010518.

  • Sobchack, Vivian. 2009. “Animation and Automation, or, the Incredible Effortfulness of Being.” Screen 50 (4): 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, Lynn. 2008. TV By Design: Modern Art and the Rise of Network Television. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Mary. 2013. “From Fibre to Frock, 16 mm Film Loop Using Cotton Spools.” Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/57236528.

  • Stark, Mary. 2014. “Points of Translation and Transformation.” Blog. Artist Residency at La Escocesa, Barcelona. https://marystarkbarcelona.wordpress.com/2014/01/31/points-of-translation-and-transformation/.

  • Stevens, Dennis. 2011. “Validity Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Mapping Craft Communities of Practice.” In Extra/Ordinary: Craft and Contemporary Art, edited by Maria Elena Buszek, 43–58. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taberham, Paul. 2019. “It Is Alive If You Are: Defining Experimental Animation.” In Experimental Animation: From Analogue to Digital, edited by Miriam Harris, Lilly Husbands, and Paul Taberham, 17–36. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Tess. 2005. “‘Meticulously, Recklessly, Worked Upon’: Direct Animation, the Auratic and the Index.” In The Sharpest Point: Animation at the End of Cinema, edited by Chris Gehman and Steve Reinke, 166–178. Toronto: XYZ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, James. 2001. The Language of Ornament. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, Malcolm, Ken Jacobs, Annette Michelson, Paul Arthur, Brian Frye, and Chrissie Iles. 2002. “Round Table: Obsolescence and American Avant-Garde Film.” October 100: 115–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Keith, and In-gyoo Jang. 2016. “The 3-D Animated Codescape: Imperfection and Digital Labor Zones in Wall-E (2008) and Wreck-It Ralph (2012).” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 11 (2): 130–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Paul. 1998. Understanding Animation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Paul. 2002. Animation: Genre and Authorship. London: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Anne. 2015. “Foreword: Sloppy Craft—Origins of a Term.” In Sloppy Craft: Postdisciplinarity and the Crafts, edited by Elaine Cheasley Paterson and Susan Surette, xxiv–xxvii. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Aylish. 2014. “Behind the Scenes: A Study of Autodesk Maya.” Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal 9 (3): 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Middlesex University, London, UK

    Lilly Husbands

Authors
  1. Lilly Husbands
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK

    Caroline Ruddell

  2. School of Media and Performance, Arts University Bournemouth, Poole, UK

    Paul Ward

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Husbands, L. (2019). Craft as Critique in Experimental Animation. In: Ruddell, C., Ward, P. (eds) The Crafty Animator. Palgrave Animation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13943-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation