Skip to main content

Other Imaging Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Breast Diseases

Abstract

Imaging techniques have significantly developed in recent years. The rather relevant morphological image has evolved into a physiological and functional image capable of providing valuable additional information for a better understanding of disease processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Literature

  1. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging - preliminary results. Radiology. 2010;256(1):297–303. Forty-eight were analyzed using conventional ultrasonography and shear wave elastography in lesions that had available histopathology. This quantitative technique provided quantitative measures of elasticity, adding complementary information that could potentially help in the characterization of breast lesion

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berg WA, Weinberg IN, Narayanan D, Lobrano ME, Ross E, Amodei L, et al. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (“positron emission mammography”) is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 2006;12(4):309–23. In this study, we evaluated 94 women with known breast cancer or suspected breast lesions and performed PEM with intravenous injection of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). PEM demonstrated sensitivity for detection of cancer of 90%, specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 88%, negative predictive value of 88% and accuracy of 88%

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA, Teal C, Kelly T, Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;247(3):651–7. This study retrospectively evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of BSGI scintimammography for the detection of breast cancer; 146 patients were evaluated, 167 lesions were submitted to biopsy, of which 83 were malignant. BSIG demonstrated high sensitivity (96.4%) and moderate specificity (59.5%) in detecting breast cancers

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, Fallenberg EM, Jong RA, Koomen M, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(3):R94. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of the diagnosis of dual-energy digital mammography with contrast when associated with mammography and ultrasonography with the precision of the diagnosis of mammography and ultrasonography alone. It was concluded that dual-energy digital mammography with contrast as a complement for mammography and ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy in relation to mammography and ultrasonography alone

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallis M, Moa E, Zanca F, et al. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. Radiology. 2012;262(3):788–96. This study with 130 patients demonstrated a higher diagnostic accuracy of 2-position tomosynthesis than 2D digital mammography – mean area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.772 for 2D, AUC = 0.851 for tomosynthesis)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kestelman, F.P., Gomes, C.F.A. (2019). Other Imaging Methods. In: Novita, G., Frasson, A., Millen, E., Zerwes, F., Cavalcante, F. (eds) Breast Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13636-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13636-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13635-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13636-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics