Abstract
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered a precursor lesion to prostate carcinoma and a surrogate marker for cancer in prostate biopsies. It is characterized by secretory epithelial proliferation within the prostate glands and acini that display significant cytological atypia. PIN does not result in an abnormal digital rectal examination nor elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and can only be diagnosed by histological examination of the prostate tissue. Based on the degree of atypia, PIN can be categorized into low-grade (LGPIN) and high-grade PIN (HGPIN). The significance of a PIN diagnosis in biopsy is the cancer risk in follow-up repeat biopsies. LGPIN is not associated with increased cancer detection in follow-up repeat biopsies, and its diagnosis is not readily reproducible even among urologic pathologists; therefore, it should not be diagnosed and reported in prostate biopsy. The clinical significance and management of HGPIN diagnosed in needle biopsy have drastically changed in the last decade. The diagnosis carries a 20–30% cancer risk in subsequent biopsies, which is not significantly higher than the cancer risk associated with a benign or LGPIN diagnosis. Therefore, men with HGPIN involving a single biopsy core should be followed similar to men with benign results and do not need repeat biopsy. Men with HGPIN involving multiple cores have an increased risk of cancer compared with those with a benign or unifocal HGPIN. These patients are recommended for additional serum and urine biomarker testing and imaging studies to assess the risk of high-grade cancer, and the decision to perform repeat biopsy depends upon such risk assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bostwick DG, Qian J. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol. 2004;17:360–79.
Tosoian JJ, Alam R, Ball MW, Carter HB, Epstein JI. Managing high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical glands on prostate biopsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15:55–66.
De Marzo AM, Haffner MC, Lotan TL, Yegnasubramanian S, Nelson WG. Premalignancy in prostate cancer: rethinking what we know. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2016;9:648–56.
Humphrey PA. Prostate pathology. Chicago: ASCP Press; 2003. p. 186.
Bostwick DG, Amin MB, Dundore P, Marsh W, Schultz DS. Architectural patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 1993;24:298–310.
Epstein JI. Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2009;454:1–16.
Egevad L, Allsbrook WC, Epstein JI. Current practice of diagnosis and reporting of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and glandular atypia among genitourinary pathologists. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:180–5.
Rubin MA, Zhou M, Dhanasekaran SM, Varambally S, Barrette TR, Sanda MG, et al. Alpha-Methylacyl coenzyme A racemase as a tissue biomarker for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2002;287:1662–70.
Wu CL, Yang XJ, Tretiakova M, Patton KT, Halpern EF, Woda BA, et al. Analysis of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) expression in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:1008–13.
Furusato B, Tan SH, Young D, Dobi A, Sun C, Mohamed AA, et al. ERG oncoprotein expression in prostate cancer: clonal progression of ERG-positive tumor cells and potential for ERG-based stratification. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2010;13:228–37.
Park K, Tomlins SA, Mudaliar KM, Chiu YL, Esgueva R, Mehra R, et al. Antibody-based detection of ERG rearrangement-positive prostate cancer. Neoplasia. 2010;12:590–8.
Perner S, Mosquera JM, Demichelis F, Hofer MD, Paris PL, Simko J, et al. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer: an early molecular event associated with invasion. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:882–8.
Godoy G, Taneja SS. Contemporary clinical management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11:20–31.
Schlesinger C, Bostwick DG, Iczkowski KA. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation: predictive value for cancer in current practice. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1201–7.
Girasole CR, Cookson MS, Putzi MJ, Chang SS, Smith JA Jr, Wells N, et al. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol. 2006;175:929–33; discussion 933.
Hameed O, Humphrey PA. Stratified epithelium in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a mimic of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:899–906.
Tavora F, Epstein JI. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasialike ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a clinicopathologic study of 28 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1060–7.
Guo CC, Epstein JI. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: histologic features and clinical significance. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:1528–35.
Han B, Suleman K, Wang L, Siddiqui J, Sercia L, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al. ETS gene aberrations in atypical cribriform lesions of the prostate: implications for the distinction between intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and cribriform high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:478–85.
Shah RB, Zhou M. Atypical cribriform lesions of the prostate: clinical significance, differential diagnosis and current concept of intraduct al carcinoma of the prostate. Adv Anat Pathol. 2012;19:270–8.
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2. 2018. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate_detection.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shah, R.B., Zhou, M. (2019). High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. In: Prostate Biopsy Interpretation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13601-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13601-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13600-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13601-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)