Skip to main content

Is Higher Education Inherently Good, Educative Practices Intrinsically Good and Universities Instrumentally Good? What Should We Hope For?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Higher Education and Hope
  • 909 Accesses

Abstract

Although there has been considerable debate in contemporary literature on the erosion of public good in higher education, most of it has concentrated on the word ‘public’ in the phrase rather than on the notion of ‘good’. A focus on the ‘good’ is attempted here, and the distinctions between inherent, intrinsic and instrumental are used in a framework devised by Audi (The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition in Intrinsic Value. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004) to develop the following ideas: that education is inherently good; that aspects of its practice are feasibly intrinsically good; and the institutions in which the practice of higher education is delivered is contributive and thus of instrumental value. For if education is intrinsically good then it is something we can all hope for as a common good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A much fuller discussion can be found in Korsgaard’s Creating the Kingdom of Ends (1996) around a distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic values as distinct from instrumental and final value.

  2. 2.

    The opposite, applying to bad values and uses.

  3. 3.

    Nicomachean Ethics, 1097a, pp. 25–30.

  4. 4.

    I have gone further elsewhere and argued that this stance ought to lead to one’s contentment and suggested that higher education can play a part in this.

  5. 5.

    This raises issue of the right to education, which I will discuss in another section.

  6. 6.

    Page numbers of the White Paper.

References

  • Aristotle. (1984). Nicomachean Ethics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (pp. 729–1867). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2004). The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition in Intrinsic Value. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2006). Intrinsic Value and Reasons for Action. In T. Horgan & M. Timmons (Eds.), Metaethics After Moore (pp. 79–106). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2009). Moral Virtue and the Reasons for Action. Philosophical Issues,19(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2017). Virtue and Character in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Studies,65(1), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. (2002). The Meaning of ‘Good’ and the Possibility of Value. Philosophical Studies,108, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2016). Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. Higher Education White Paper. DBIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2016). Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1988). Well-Being. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, P. (2011). Refurbishing MacIntyre’s Account of Practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(3), 545–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan, R. (1997). Educational ‘Goods’: Value and Benefit. Journal of Philosophy of Education,31(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1993). Grounding for the Metaphysics of Moral (J. E. Ellington, Trans.). London: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2005a). Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2005b). The Conflict of the Faculties. In Religion and Rational Theology (pp. 233–327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2011). Against Absolute Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, N. M. (2009). Intrinsic Value: Concept and Warrant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longden, B., & Bélanger, C. (2013). Universities: Public Good or Private Profit. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(5), 501–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue. London: Duckworth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2011). Higher Education and Public Good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (2000). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (2013). Ethics. New York: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. (2012). Higher Education and the Public Good. London: Continuum International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. (2017). Higher Education and the Public Good. In J. C. Shin & P. N. Teixeira (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions (Section: Mass and Elite Higher Education in the 21st Century, M. Klemenčič, Ed.). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London: Springer (Available Online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozolin, T. T. (2013). R.S. Peters and J.H. Newman on the Aims of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(2), 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1997). Republic. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato the Complete Works (pp. 971–1223). London: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (1998). The Value of Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education,32(3), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (2002). The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2003). Thinking With Each Other: The Peculiar Practice of the University. Journal of Philosophy of Education,37(2), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2016). A Critical Exploration of Changing Definitions of Public Good in Relation to Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education,41(4), 619–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Gibbs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gibbs, P. (2019). Is Higher Education Inherently Good, Educative Practices Intrinsically Good and Universities Instrumentally Good? What Should We Hope For?. In: Gibbs, P., Peterson, A. (eds) Higher Education and Hope. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13566-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13566-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13565-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13566-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics