Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theorists of Transformation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Insecurity, Precarious Work and Labour Markets

  • 502 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on a range of what might be termed “grand narratives” of the transformation of employment. Specifically, it looks at broad accounts of changes envisaged as taking place during the neoliberal period that result, among other things, in the disempowerment of workers through increasing precarity. The theorists examined include Ulrich Beck, Zygmunt Bauman, Richard Sennett, Manuel Castells, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Guy Standing and Arne Kalleberg. Two broader concepts that frame discussions of precarity are also considered. The first is the notion of dual or segmented labour markets, which has sometimes been offered as a theoretical framework to explain the division of workers into precarious and non-precarious groupings. The second is the literature of flexibility and the flexible firm. Many of these accounts are questioned on theoretical grounds or on the basis of empirical claims they make.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apostle, R., D. Clairmont, and L. Osberg. 1985. Segmentation and Wage Determination. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 22 (1): 30–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. 1984. Manpower strategies for flexible organisations. Personnel Management 16 (August), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, J. 2002. A Survey of the Use of the Term Précarité in French Economics and Sociology. Centre d’Etudes de l’Emploi, Working Paper 19. Available from: www.cee-recherche.fr/sites/default/files/webfm/publications/docdetravail/19-precarite-France.pdf. Viewed 2 January 2017.

  • Barbier, J. 2008. There Is More to Job Quality Than “Precariousness”: A Comparative Epistemological Analysis of the “Flexibility and Security” Debate in Europe. In Flexibility and Employment Security in Europe, ed. R. Muffels, 31–49. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, J. 2011. “Employment Precariousness” in a European Cross-National Perspective: A Sociological Review of Thirty Years of Research. Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne. Available from: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00654370/en/. Viewed 6 September 2016.

  • Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 2000. The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 2013. Why “Class” Is Too Soft a Category to Capture the Explosiveness of Social Inequality at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century. The British Journal of Sociology 64 (1): 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. 1976. The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R.M., and M. Mann. 1979. The Working Class in the Labour Market. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLS. 2005. Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, February 2005. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available from: www.bls.gov/news.release/conemp.toc.htm. Viewed: 2 January 2015.

  • Bourdieu, P. 1963. Travail et Travailleurs en Algérie. Paris: Mouton et Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1998. Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., et al. 1999. The Weight of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. 2003. The Empire’s New Clothes. Critical Inquiry 29 (2): 337–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W., and P. Edwards. 2009. Researching the Changing Workplace. In The Evolution of the Modern Workplace, ed. W. Brown, A. Bryson, J. Forth, and K. Whitfield, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2000a. The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2000b. End of Millennium, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2000c. Materials for an Exploratory Theory of the Network Society. The British Journal of Sociology 51 (1): 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 2010. The Power of Identity, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choonara, J. 2018. Class and the Classical Marxist Tradition. In Considering Class: Theory, Culture and Media in the 21st Century, ed. M. Wayne and D. O’Neill, 15–30. Leiden, NL: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, H. 2012. Book Review Symposium: Guy Standing, The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, Reviewed by Hazel Conley. Work, Employment & Society 26 (4): 686–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cove. 2008. Hard Work, Hidden Lives: the Full Report of the TUC Commission on Vulnerable Employment. Trade Union Congress. Available from: www.vulnerableworkers.org.uk/files/CoVE_full_report.pdf. Viewed 17 April 2015.

  • Dawes, S. 2011. The Role of the Intellectual in Liquid Modernity: An Interview with Zygmunt Bauman. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (3): 130–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., S. Hänninen, M. Siisiäinen, and T. Silvasti. 2015. The Precarization Effect. In The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness, ed. D. Della Porta, S. Hänninen, M. Siisiäinen and T. Silvasti, 1–23. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P.B., and M.J. Piore. 1970. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Washington, DC: Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doogan, K. 2015. Precarity—Minority Condition or Majority Experience? In The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness, ed. D. Della Porta, S. Hänninen, M. Siisiäinen and T. Silvasti, 43–62. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. 1969. The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekbia, H.R., and R. Kling. 2005. Network Organizations: Symmetric Cooperation or Multivalent Negotiation? The Information Society 21 (3): 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. 1998. Labour Market Theory: A Constructive Reassessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foti, A. 2017. The Precariat for Itself. In Mapping Precariousness, Labour Insecurity and Uncertain Livelihoods, ed. E. Armano, A. Bove, and A. Murgia, 149–156. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. 2005. Into the Factory: Negri’s Lenin and the Subjective Caesura (1986–73). In The Philosophy of Antonio Negri: Resistance in Practice, ed. T. S. Murphy and A. Mustapha, 7–37. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2001. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2004. Multitude. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, J. 2017. (Re)Conceptualising Precarity: Institutions, Structure and Agency. Employee Relations 39 (3): 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B., and A. Sum. 1979. The Theory of “Dual” or Segmented Labour Markets. Journal of Economic Issues 13 (3): 687–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, C. 2006. Laboring in the Network. Capitalism Nature Socialism 17 (1): 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, H., and K. Dörre. 2013. Revival of the “German model”? Destandardization and the New Labour Market Regime. In Non-Standard Employment in Europe, ed. M. Kock and M. Fritz, 132–149. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. 2010. The Problem with Networks Theory. Labor History 51 (1): 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A.L. 2009. Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition. American Sociological Review 74 (1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A.L. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A.L. 2012. Book Review Symposium: Guy Standing, The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class, Reviewed by Arne Kalleberg. Work, Employment & Society 26 (4): 685–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. 2014. Measuring Precarious Work. EINet Working Paper. Available from: https://ssascholars.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/einet/files/einet_papers_kalleberg.pdf. Viewed 24 July 2017.

  • Kosanovich, K., and E.T. Sherman. 2015. Trends in Long-Term Unemployment. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Spotlight on Statistics March 2015. Available from: www.bls.gov/spotlight/2015/long-term-unemployment/pdf/long-term-unemployment.pdf. Viewed 25 June 2017.

  • Loveridge, R., and A. Mok. 1980. Theoretical Approaches to Segmented Labour Markets. International Journal of Social Economics 7 (7): 376–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin, S. 2000. Union Decline in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations 38 (4): 631–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. 2006. Are We Living in a Post-Bureaucratic Epoch? Journal of Organizational Change Management 19 (1): 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melin, H., and R. Blom. 2015. Precarity in Different Worlds of Social Classes. In The New Social Division: Making and Unmaking Precariousness, ed. D. Della Porta, S. Hänninen, M. Siisiäinen, and T. Silvasti, 27–42. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitropoulos, A. 2006. Precari-Us?. Mute 1 (29). Available from: www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/precari-us. Viewed 26 September 2016.

  • Mitropoulos, A. 2011. From Precariousness to Risk Management and Beyond. European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies. Available from: http://eipcp.net/transversal/0811/mitropoulos/en. Viewed 27 April 2015.

  • Munck, R. 2013. The Precariat: A View from the South. Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 747–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A. 1991. Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A. 2005a. Proletarians and the State: Towards a Discussion of Workers’ Autonomy and the Historic Compromise. In Books for Burning: Between Civil War and Democracy in 1970s Italy, ed. T. S. Murphy, 118–179. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A. 2005b. Domination and Sabotage: On the Marxist Method of Social Transformation. In Books for Burning: Between Civil War and Democracy in 1970s Italy, ed. T. S. Murphy, 231–290. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, B., and N. Rossiter. 2008. Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception. Theory, Culture & Society 25 (7–8): 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, R. 2004. Analysis: “Inside and Outside ESF 2004”. Indymedia UK, October 29. Available from: www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/10/300249.html. Viewed 6 September 2016.

  • OECD. 1996. OECD Employment Outlook 1996. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 1997. OECD Employment Outlook 1997. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2015. LFS—Employment by Permanency. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TEMP_D. Viewed 25 March 2015.

  • Palmer, B.D. 2014. Reconsiderations of Class: Precariousness as Proletarianization. Socialist Register 50: 40–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, D. 2017. Two Endings of the Precarious Movement. In Mapping Precariousness, Labour Insecurity and Uncertain Livelihoods, ed. E. Armano, A. Bove, and A. Murgia, 137–148. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M., and C. Sabel. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 2001. The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollert, A. 1988. The “Flexible Firm”: Fixation or Fact? Work, Employment & Society 2 (3): 281–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollert, A. 1991. The Orthodoxy of Flexibility. In Farewell to Flexibility?, ed. A. Pollert, 3–31. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. 2012. Precarity Talk: a Virtual Roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejic, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Puar, and Ana Vujanovic. TDR/The Drama Review 56 (4): 163–177. Available from: www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/DRAM_a_00221. Viewed 6 September 2016.

  • Savage, M., F. Devine, N. Cunningham, M. Taylor, Y. Li, J. Hjellbrekke, B.L. Roux, S. Friedman, and A. Miles. 2013. A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment. Sociology 47 (2): 219–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. 1998. The Corrosion of Character. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. 2006. The Culture of the New Capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. 2009. Work After Globalization: Building Occupational Citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. 2005. Foundation and Empire: A Critique of Hardt and Negri. Capital & Class 29 (2): 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. 1970. Future Shock. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. 1981. The Third Wave. London: Pan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. 1971. The Post-Industrial Society: Tomorrow’s Social History: Classes, Conflicts and Culture in the Programmed Society. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronti, M. 2010. Workerism and Politics. Historical Materialism 18 (3): 186–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronti, M. 2012. Our Operaismo. New Left Review 1 (73): 119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. 1999. The One-Dimensional Network Society of Manuel Castells. New Media & Society 1 (1): 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, K.C. 2016. The Post-Industrial Society: From Utopia to Ideology. Work, Employment & Society 30 (2): 366–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. 2007. Technological Innovation and Market Turbulence: The Dot-Com Experience. Review of Economic Dynamics 10 (1): 78–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.C. 2007. Rethinking the Future of Work: Directions and Visions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Joseph Choonara

Authors
  1. Joseph Choonara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Choonara, J. (2019). Theorists of Transformation. In: Insecurity, Precarious Work and Labour Markets . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13330-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13330-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13329-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13330-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation