Abstract
The development of electronic governance in any country is determined by cultural features, the level of education and information-communication infrastructure. The article comprehensively researches the readiness potential of Armenian and Russian societies for electronic governance. This choice is reasoned by the fact that, first of all, Russia and Armenia are members of the Eurasian Economic Union, which currently harmonizes digital transformation policies of the member-states. In this context the application of Hofstede’s model and Inglehart-Welzel’s cultural map allows to reveal that both Armenians and Russians are oriented towards struggle for survival at the expense of self-expression and strive to stability. The complex evaluation demonstrates low level for Power distance and Uncertainty. For Armenia it is 0.19 and for Russia - 0.06. This means that the level of technological conditions in a country does not necessarily lead to comprehensive technological penetration into a society. For instance, both Armenian and Russian societies have serious cultural barriers which impede the development of network interactions. The authors have calculated the readiness potential of the societies for electronic governance according to ICT access, ICT use, Government’s online service, E-participation, grand coefficient of the coverage of population with higher education, Power distance and Uncertainty avoidance for the above mentioned period. Their values are fluctuating in the range of 36.40–38.57% for Russia and 22.39–27.71% for Armenia. Thus the readiness potential of the societies for electronic governance has serious potential to develop in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kim, B.J., Park, S.: Why digital government not e-government? The paradigm shift of D. gov in Korea. In: Proceedings of The 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research 2016, pp. 530–531. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912233
Jun, C.N., Chung, C.J.: Big data analysis of local government 3.0: focusing on Gyeongsangbuk-do in Korea. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 110, 3–12 (2016)
Veiga, L.: Digital government and administrative burden reduction. In: 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2016) 2016, pp. 323–326. Montevideo (2016)
Khalil, O.E.M.: E-government readiness: does national culture matter? Gov. Inf. Q. 28(3), 388–399 (2011)
Koh, C.E., Prybutok, V.R., Zhang, X.: Measuring e-government readiness. Inf. Manage. 45(8), 540–546 (2008)
Al-Omari, A., Al-Omari, H.: E-government readiness assessment model. J. Comput. Sci. 2(11), 841–845 (2006)
Garant Homepage. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71708158/. Accessed 01 Apr 2018
Platonova, I., Martynov, A., Bundin, M.: Trust in digital government as a result of overcoming knowledge access inequality and dissemination of belief in e-democracy. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research 2015, pp. 309–311. ACM (2015)
Shareef, M.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Laumer, S., Archer, N.: Citizens’ adoption behavior of mobile government (mGov): a cross-cultural study. Inf. Syst. Manage. 33(3), 268–283 (2016)
Carter, L., Weerakkody, V., Phillips, B., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Citizen adoption of e-government services: exploring citizen perceptions of online services in the United States and United Kingdom. Inf. Syst. Manage. 33(2), 124–140 (2016)
Aletdinova, A., Koritsky, A.: The relationship of ICT with human capital formation in rural and urban areas of Russia. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2018. CCIS, vol. 859, pp. 19–27. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02846-6_2
Hofstede, G.: Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings Psychol. Cult. 2(1), 8 (2011)
Minkov, M., Hofstede, G.: The evolution of Hofstede’s doctrine. Cross Cult. Manage. Int. J. 18(1), 10–20 (2011)
Hofstede, G., Minkov, M.: Long-versus short-term orientation: new perspectives. Asia Pacific Bus. Rev. 16(4), 493–504 (2010)
Mkoyan, G.S.: National culture and ways of its preservation in a transforming society. Izvestiya of the St. Petersburg State Econ. Univ. 2(98), 103–106 (2016)
G. Hofstede’s model. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/russia/. Accessed 04 June 2018
Paturyan, Y.J., Gevorgyan, V., Badalyan, T., Grigoryan, N., Kojoyan, A.: Civic activism as a novel component of armenian civil society: new energy and tensions. Turpanjian Center for Policy Analysis (2015)
Gorshkov, M.K., Tikhonova, Ye, N.: Sotsiokul’turnyye faktory konsolidatsii rossiyskogo obshchestva: Informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten’ Instituta sotsiologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk=Information-analytical bulletin of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences 1, 54 (2013). (in Russian)
Bowser, D.: Corruption, Trust, and the Danger to Democratization in the Former Soviet Union. Routledge, Berlin (2017)
Inglehart, R.: Postmodernization brings declining respect for authority but rising support for democracy. In: Norris, P. (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)
Inglehart, R., Welzel, C.: Changing mass priorities: the link between modernization and democracy. Perspect. Politics 8(2), 551–567 (2010)
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (eds.): The Global Innovation Index 2016: Innovation Feeding the World. Johnson Cornell University, Ithaca (2017)
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (eds.): The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation. Johnson Cornell University, Ithaca (2016)
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S.: The Global Innovation Index 2015. Effective Innovation Policies for Development. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva (2015)
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S.: The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor in Innovation. WIPO, Geneva (2014)
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B.: The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Local Dynamics of Innovation. WIPO, Geneva (2014)
Shalanov, N.V., Aletdinova A.A.: Algorithm of taxonomy: method of design and implementation mechanism. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1015 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1015/3/032004
Elamiryan R.: Network society as the key factor for effective functioning of the Eurasian union. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (EGOSE 2016), pp. 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3014087.3014114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aletdinova, A., Elamiryan, R. (2019). The Level of Readiness for Electronic Governance: Comparative Analysis of Armenian and Russian Societies. In: Chugunov, A., Misnikov, Y., Roshchin, E., Trutnev, D. (eds) Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13283-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13282-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13283-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)