Skip to main content

Restoration and Management of World Heritage Christian Cultural Sites: Problems of Religious Tourism – Challenges - Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage (TMM_CH 2018)

Abstract

Taking under consideration the exceptional value and unique religious and cultural significance of the Old City of Jerusalem, as well as that since 1981 the “Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls” are inscribed on the World Heritage List, is worth a discussion on the linkages between the World Heritage Convention and the heritage of Christian religious interest (with special reference to those connected with the image of the “New Jerusalem”): whether doctrinal texts and principles are capable to be applied in practice and in the local context of individual examples, identifying our interest on specific issues, such as: the definition, acceptance and interpretation of associated spiritual values of the past in the modern world, the question about the meaning and the limits of restoration and reconstruction, particularly in relation to the notions of authenticity and integrity, the research of the problems in the field of sustainable development (religious tourism, pilgrimage etc.), and the role of the religious community in the management of the World Heritage property.

Honorable Professor of Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering, ICOMOS expert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://whc.unesco.org/en/convention/.

  2. 2.

    UNESCO, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, rev. 2017, https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/, IIA 45, Article 1.

  3. 3.

    Operational Guidelines, 49.

  4. 4.

    Cameron Ch (2009) The evolution of the concept of Outstanding Universal Value. In: King J, Stanley-Price N (eds) Conserving the authentic – Essays in honour of Jukka Jokilehto, ICCROM Conservation Studies, No.10, pp 127–136.

  5. 5.

    For the term hierotopy see: Lidov A (2006) Hierotopy. The Creation of Sacred Spaces as a Form of Creativity and Subject of Cultural History. In: Lidov A (ed) Hierotopy. Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia, Moscow, pp 32–58.

  6. 6.

    Erdeljan J (2011) New Jerusalems as New Constantinoples? Reflexions of the reasons and principles of Translatio Constantinopoleos in Slavia Orthodoxa. In: Δελτίον Χριστιανικής Αρχαιολογικής Εταιρείας 32, pp 11–18; Hoffmann A, Wolf G (ed) Jerusalem as Narrative Space/Elzählraum Jerusalem, Leiden (2012); Sible de Blaauw (2014) Translations of the Sacred City between Jerusalem and Rome. In: Goudeau J, Verhoeven M, Weijers W (eds) The Imagined and Real Jerusalem in Art and Architecture, Leiden, Chapter 6, pp 136–165.

  7. 7.

    Chkhartishvili M (2009) Mtskheta as New Jerusalem: Hierotopy in the Life of St Nino. In: Lidov A (ed) New Jerusalems. Hierotopy and iconography of sacred spaces, Moscow, pp 131–150.

  8. 8.

    Sidorenko A, Prepis A, Lizitsin K (2018) Historical monuments of Mtskheta – Georgia, Report on the joint UNESCO World Heritage Centre/ ICOMOS/ ICCROM Reactive Monitoring Mission (19-24/2/2018), Paris, p 61 + 158 photos.

  9. 9.

    Poulios, I (2014) Past in the Present: A Living Heritage Approach – Meteora, Greece, London, Ubiquity Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/bak.

  10. 10.

    Poulios, I., op.cit.

  11. 11.

    Prepis A (2015) The management of historic monuments in the process of creating national identities in the Balkans (19th-20th c.). In: International Symposium - Culture and Space in the Balkans, 17th -20th c. University of Macedonia – Department of Balkan, Slavic and Eastern Studies, Thessaloniki, pp 535–556; Αλκιβιάδης Πρέπης, « Η διαχείριση των ιστορικών μνημείων στη διαδικασία συγκρότησης των εθνικών ταυτοτήτων στα Βαλκάνια (19ος-20ος αι.) » , Διεθνές Συμπόσιο Πολιτισμός και Χώρος στα Βαλκάνια, 17ος -20ος αιώνας, Πανεπιστήμιο Μακεδονίας – Τμήμα Βαλκανικών, Σλαβικών και Ανατολικών Σπουδών, Θεσσαλονίκη 2015, σελ. 535–556.

  12. 12.

    Old Bridge Area of the Old City of Mostar, https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/946/documents/ Advisory Body Evaluation (ICOMOS), 2005, Mostar (Bosnia and Herzegovina) No 946 rev, file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/946rev-ICOMOS-1107-en.pdf, p. 183.

  13. 13.

    Prepis A, Lefantzis M, Johnson D (2004) Technical Assessment Report on the Religious Buildings/Ensembles and Cultural Sites Damaged in March 2004 in Kosovo, 1st – 2nd – 3rd expert visit. In: Integrated Rehabilitation project Plan/Survey of the Architectural Heritage, Council of Europe; Prepis A, Johnson D, Bianchi A, Gödicke H, Šurdić B, Hoxha G, Montanes F, Mills A, Wik S (2005) Protection and Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Kosovo – Consolidated Summary, UNESCO - Council of Europe - UNMIK, Paris.

  14. 14.

    Thirty-Sixth Session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery (Georgia) (C710), Decision: 37 COM 7A.32, point 4, https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5009/.

  15. 15.

    Declaration of Dresden on the “Reconstruction of Monuments Destroyed by War (1982) https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/184-the-declaration-of-dresden, Article 8.

  16. 16.

    International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter, 1964), https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf;.

  17. 17.

    The Nara Document on Authenticity (1994): https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf.

  18. 18.

    The Riga Charter on Authenticity and Historical Reconstruction in Relationship to Cultural Heritage (2000), point 6: http://www.vilagorokseg.hu/_upload/editor/UNESCO_hatteranyagok/Riga_Charter_2000.pdf.

  19. 19.

    Venice Charter, 1964, article 11.

  20. 20.

    ICOMOS Charter on the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites (“Ename Charter”), 2008, Principle 3: Context and setting, par. 1-2-3.

  21. 21.

    Haugen A M, Prepis A (2018) Report on the ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Kizhi Pogost, Republic of Karelia (Russian Federation, 13-17/3/2018), Paris, text pp 31 + annexes pp100 + 64 photos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alkiviadis Prepis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prepis, A. (2019). Restoration and Management of World Heritage Christian Cultural Sites: Problems of Religious Tourism – Challenges - Perspectives. In: Moropoulou, A., Korres, M., Georgopoulos, A., Spyrakos, C., Mouzakis, C. (eds) Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage. TMM_CH 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12960-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12960-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12959-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12960-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics