Skip to main content

Decision Making Using Interval-Valued Aggregation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interval-Valued Methods in Classifications and Decisions

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 378))

  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we present the results connected with multicriteria (or similarly multiagent) decision making problems under uncertainty. The aspects of decision making form a wide branch of considerations both in fuzzy sets theory and its extensions (cf. [1,2,3]). We consider only some of the basic concepts for the case of interval-valued fuzzy relations. Here, there is examined preservation of transitivity properties by aggregation operators. Similar considerations may be performed for the remaining properties. We concentrate on transitivity as an exemplary property since this is one of the most important properties which may guarantee consistency of choices of decision makers. Namely, following crisp notion of transitivity we see that if x is preferred to y and y is preferred to z, mathematically R(xy) and R(yz), then x should be preferred to z, in mathematical notions it means that R(xz) holds. This is intuitive and natural assumption. We provide the results connected with the notions of pos-B-transitivity, nec-B-transitivity and preservation of these properties by aggregation operators in decision making. We propose to apply the respective notion of transitivity and aggregation method, depending on the requirements of the given problem. Namely, if for a given problem we require that at least one element in the first interval is smaller or equal to at least one element in the second interval, then the notions related to \(\preceq _{\pi }\) would be suitable (pos-B-transitivity, pos-aggregation function). If for a given problem we require that each element in the first interval is smaller or equal to each element in the second interval, then the notions related to \(\preceq _{\nu }\) would be suitable (nec-B-transitivity, nec-aggregation function). We think that such approach may lead to the more meaningful results and better choice of the solution alternatives (however, please note that the mentioned classes of aggregation operators are not disjoint, cf. Corollary 2.2 and Theorem  2.9).

The speed of decision making is the essence of good governance.

Piyush Goyal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 18(2), 105–118 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control. Cybern. 78, 183–195 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: A new approach to ranking alternatives expressed via intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Ruan, D., et al. (eds.) Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, pp. 265–270. World Scientific, Singapore (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bentkowska, U.: New types of aggregation functions for interval-valued fuzzy setting and preservation of pos-B and nec-B-transitivity in decision making problems. Inf. Sci. 424, 385–399 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bentkowska, U., Pȩkala, B., Bustince, H., Fernandez, J., Jurio, A., Balicki, J.: N-reciprocity property for interval-valued fuzzy relations with an application to group decision making problems in social networks. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 25(Suppl. 1), 43–72 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, Z.: On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 3, 217–225 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Montero, J., Tejada, J., Cutello, C.: A general model for deriving preference structures from data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98, 98–110 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bilgiç, T.: Interval-valued preference structures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 105, 162–183 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrenechea, E., Fernandez, J., Pagola, M., Chiclana, F., Bustince, H.: Construction of interval-valued fuzzy preference relations from ignorance functions and fuzzy preference relations: application to decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 58, 33–44 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pȩkala, B.: Uncertainty Data in Interval-Valued Fuzzy Set Theory. Properties, Algorithms and Applications. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Bentkowska, U., Bustince, H., Jurio, A., Pagola, M., Pȩkala, B.: Decision making with an interval-valued fuzzy preference relation and admissible orders. Appl. Soft Comput. 35, 792–801 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Orlovsky, S.A.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1(3), 155–167 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hüllermeier, E., Brinker, K.: Learning valued preference structures for solving classification problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159, 2337–2352 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hüllermeier, E., Vanderlooy, S.: Combining predictions in pairwise classification: an optimal adaptive voting strategy and its relation to weighted voting. Pattern Recognit. 43(1), 128–142 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bustince, H., Galar, M., Bedregal, B., Kolesárová, A., Mesiar, R.: A new approach to interval-valued Choquet integrals and the problem of ordering in interval-valued fuzzy sets applications. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 21(6), 1150–1162 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dubois, D.: The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: old techniques and new directions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 184, 3–28 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urszula Bentkowska .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bentkowska, U. (2020). Decision Making Using Interval-Valued Aggregation. In: Interval-Valued Methods in Classifications and Decisions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 378. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12927-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics