Skip to main content

Paradigmatic and Conceptual Framework for Islamic HDI

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

The paper presents paradigmatic differences between secular and Islamic worldviews in related to understanding of human nature and human development. It outlines the Tawhīdī paradigm with its ontology, epistemology, anthropology, and teleology to establish a framework for Islamic HDI. The paradigmatic approach and Tawhīdī anthropology are both unique way of defining and measuring human development. The paper also defines key elements of human development and suggests proxy variables in constructing a new index with those variables.

This conceptual paper was empirically tested for ten Muslim countries in another paper by the author. That study measured Islamic HDI for those countries and compared with their score of conventional HDI. The rankings in the Islamic HDI for all Muslim countries except two differed from those in the conventional HDI (Aydin 2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Aydin, Necati (2014): “Luxury Consumption and Role of IBF in the GCC,” The paper will be published in an edited book on Islamic Economics and Finance in GCC by Gerlach Press.

  2. 2.

    Ibid., 270.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., 356.

  4. 4.

    Nursi, The Words, 341.

  5. 5.

    Hofstede Ranking Individualistic versus collectivistic cultures: http://geert-hofstede.com/dimensions.html; http://www.clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural-dimensions/individualism/.

References

  • Aydin, Necati. (2012). “Grand Theory of Human Nature and Happiness.” Humanomics, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, Necati. (2013). “Redefining Islamic Economics as a New Economic Paradigm.” Islamic Economic Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, Necati. (2017). “Islamic vs Conventional Human Development Index: Empirical Evidence from Ten Muslim Countries.” International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 1562–1583. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2016-0091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapra, M. Umer. (2008). The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of the Maqāsid Al-Sharī‘ah, Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., and Weale, M. (1992). “On Measuring the Quality of Life.” World Development, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. (1993). “Income and Alternative Measures of Well-Being.” In Monitoring Social Progress in the 1990s, ed. D. G. Westendorff and D. Ghai. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Avebury: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despotis, D. K. (2005). “A Reassessment of the Human Development Index via Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 56, No. 8, pp. 969–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. E., Lopez-Calva, L., and Szekely, M. (2005). “Measuring the Distribution of Human Development: Methodology and an Application to Mexico.” Journal of Human Development, Vol. 6, No. 1, p. 529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazzali, and Winter, T. J. (1997). Al-Ghazali on Disciplining the Soul: Kitab Riyadat Al-Nafs; & on Breaking the Two Desires: Kitab Kasr Al-Shahwatayn: Books XXII and XXIII of the Revival of the Religious Sciences: Ihya Ulum Al-Din. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, C., Martinez, R., and Villar, A. (2010). “Multidimensional Social Evaluation: An Application to the Measurement of Human Development.” Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. A. (1997). “The Inequality-Adjusted Human Development Index: A Constructive Proposal.” World Development, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 1283–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, I., Arcelus, F. J., and Srinivasan, G. (1999). “An Assessment of the Measurement Properties of the Human Development Index.” Social Indicators Research, Vol. 46, pp. 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, N. C. (2004). “Values Reflected in the Human Development Index.” Social Indicators Research, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. L. (1993). “Development Data Constraints and the Human Development Index.” In Monitoring Social Progress in the 1990s, ed. D. G. Westerndorff and D. Ghai, pp. 40–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998a). “A Modified Human Development Index.” World Development, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998b). “The Human Development Index: Some Technical Issues and Alternative Indices.” Journal of International Development, vol. 10, pp. 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nursi, Said. (1996a). The Words. Trans. Sukran Vahide. Sozler Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nursi, Said. (1996b). The Rays. Trans. Sukran Vahide. Sozler Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogwang, T. (1994). “The Choice of Principle Variables for Computing the Human Development Index.” World Development, Vol. 22, No. 12, pp. 2011–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, A., and Najam, A. (1998). “The Human Development Index: A Critical Review.” Ecological Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1984). Resources, Values and Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth, S. (2009). “Inequality, Interactions, and Human Development.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 10, pp. 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1994a). “Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel?” The American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1994b). “Data Base for Development Analysis: An Overview.” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 44, pp. 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aydin, N. (2019). Paradigmatic and Conceptual Framework for Islamic HDI. In: Ali, S. (eds) Towards a Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Index of Socio-Economic Development. Palgrave Studies in Islamic Banking, Finance, and Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12793-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12793-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12792-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12793-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics