Skip to main content

ERCP-Related Bleeding Adverse Events

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dilemmas in ERCP
  • 549 Accesses

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex and challenging procedure with impressive diagnostic and therapeutic potential that comes along with a relatively low but real risk of adverse events. One of the more common adverse events is bleeding, typically from endoscopic sphincterotomy. Herein, we describe approaches for the practicing endoscopist to identify, prevent, and manage ERCP-related bleeding. Clinical judgment and knowledge of patient-related risk factors are important for preprocedure planning. Various techniques can be employed to mitigate bleeding risk during and after the procedure. Finally, we offer practical advice on managing these difficult cases when ERCP-related bleeding occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events. General overview. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25:97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman ML, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chavalitdhamrong D, Donepudi S, Pu L, Draganov PV. Uncommon and rarely reported adverse events of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandrasekhara V, et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cotton PB, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotton PB, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandblom P. Hemorrhage into the biliary tract following trauma; traumatic hemobilia. Surgery. 1948;24:571–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katsinelos P, et al. Risk factors for therapeutic ERCP-related complications: an analysis of 2,715 cases performed by a single endoscopist. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27:65–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Adike A, Al-qaisi M, Baffy NJ, Kosiorek H, Pannala R. International normalized ratio does not predict gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;10:177–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paik WH, et al. Optimal time of resuming anticoagulant after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients at risk for thromboembolism: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 32(9):3902–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Acosta RD, et al. The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keswani RN, Qumseya BJ, O’Dwyer LC, Wani S. Association between endoscopist and center endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography volume with procedure success and adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1866–1875.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilcox CM, Canakis J, Mönkemüller KE, Bondora AW, Geels W. Patterns of bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy, the subsequent risk of bleeding, and the role of epinephrine injection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:244–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsou YK, et al. Treating delayed endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced bleeding: epinephrine injection with or without thermotherapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4823–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang JH, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1132–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdel Samie A. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents for treatment of malignant and benign biliary strictures. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;4:405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah JN, Marson F, Binmoeller KF. Temporary self-expandable metal stent placement for treatment of post-sphincterotomy bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1274–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Canena J, Liberato M, Horta D, Romão C, Coutinho A. Short-term stenting using fully covered self-expandable metal stents for treatment of refractory biliary leaks, postsphincterotomy bleeding, and perforations. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2013;27:313–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Itoi T, et al. Endoscopic hemostasis using covered metallic stent placement for uncontrolled post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. Endoscopy. 2011;43:369–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cochrane J, Schlepp G. Comparing endoscopic intervention against fully covered self-expanding metal stent placement for post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleed (CEASE Study). Endosc Int Open. 2016;04:E1261–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leung JWC, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Chung SCS. Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: a study of risk factors and the role of epinephrine injection. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:550–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee MH, et al. Predictors of re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis for delayed post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:3196–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Adler DG, Lieb JG 2nd, Cohen J, et al. Quality Indicators for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

SW is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the University of Colorado, Department of Medicine, Outstanding Early Scholars Program (SW) and the NIH Gastrointestinal Diseases Training Grant T32 DK007038 (JK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kolb, J.M., Wani, S. (2019). ERCP-Related Bleeding Adverse Events. In: Mullady, D. (eds) Dilemmas in ERCP. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12741-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12741-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12740-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12741-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics