Abstract
Forensic psychiatry, as a medical profession within a multidisciplinary field of criminal justice and psychiatry, produces a wealth of moral dilemmas. This chapter will discuss some of these dilemmas, making reference to two of the four principles of biomedical ethics by Beauchamp and Childress: respect for justice and respect for autonomy. These principles will be addressed with the use of case studies. As forensic psychiatry is part of medicine, the principle for the respect of justice poses challenges as medicine is usually concerned with the needs to individual patients, unlike criminal justice where punishment comes into play. Respect for autonomy is a core principle in healthcare. However, in forensic psychiatry autonomy is a complex concept, e.g. due to the involuntary detainment of patients. Discussing ethical dilemmas in the context of forensic psychiatry issues arises at the level of patients, victims and society as a whole; others pose challenges for the system in itself. As the field is a complex field, new moral dilemmas occur on a daily basis and deserve further academic research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The topic of this book is long-term forensic psychiatric care. In this context, whenever the terms “forensic psychiatry”, “forensic long stay” or “long stay” are used, this refers to long-term forensic psychiatric care.
- 2.
With this argument, Fried is addressing Robert Nozick’s libertarian property rights. The problem she stipulates is similar to formal theories of justice. Due to the nature of formal theories, they do not contain content. A famous example of a formal rule is “always tell the truth”. Prima facie, this seems to be a rule most people would agree to follow. However, if, for instance, during WWII one was hiding a Jewish family and the Nazis knocked at the door, would it be wrong to lie? Or should one be honest at the expense of the Jewish family?
- 3.
Anne Faber was a 25-year-old woman who was killed and raped by an offender with a history of two counts of rape. He refused to be examined for admission to forensic–psychiatric care in 2010 and therefore received a prison sentence and was released in 2017.
- 4.
For a full discussion of this subject see O’Neill 2002 Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
References
Austin W, Goble E, Kelecevic J. The ethics of forensic psychiatry: moving beyond principles to a relational ethics approach. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2009;20(6):835–50.
Düwell M. Bioethics: methods, theories, domains. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
van Marle HJC, van der Kroft P. Research issues in forensic psychiatry. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007;20:511–5.
Blightman K, Griffiths SE, Danbury C. Patient confidentiality: when can a breach be justified? Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2014;14(2):52–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkt032.
Helmchen H, Sartorius N. Ethics in psychiatry, European contributions. International library of ethics, law and the new medicine, vol. 45. Dordrecht: Spinger; 2010. p. 363–80.
Adshead G. Care or custody? Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry. J Med Ethics. 2000;26(5):302–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.26.5.302.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Nozick R. Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books; 1974.
Rawls J. A theory of justice, justice as fairness. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971.
Berman M. Two kinds of retributivism. In: Duff RA, Green SP, editors. Philosophical foundations of the criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 433–57.
Fried B. Does Nozick have a theory of property rights? In: Meadowcroft J, Bader RM, editors. The Cambridge companion to Nozick’s anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 230–52.
Appelbaum PS. I Introduction. In: Sisti DA, Caplan AL, Rimon-Greenspan H, editors. Applied ethics in mental health care: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013. p. 1–4. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5cx.6.
Wade N. The other secrets of the genome. New York Times. 2001 Feb 18.
Little R, Strecker E. Moot questions in psychiatric ethics. In: Sisti DA, Caplan AL, Rimon-Greenspan H, editors. Applied ethics in mental health care: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013. p. 25–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5cx.8.
Appelbaum PS. II Introduction. In: Sisti DA, Caplan AL, Rimon-Greenspan H, editors. Applied ethics in mental health care: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013. p. 75–8. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5cx.11.
Mackenzie C. Autonomy. In: Arras JD, Fenton JD, Kukla R, editors. The Routledge companion to bioethics. New York: Routledge; 2015. p. 278–90.
Mill JS On liberty. Indianapolis and New York: The Liberal Arts Press; 1956. Originally published 1859.
Berlin I. Two concepts of liberty. In: Berlin I, editor. Four essays on liberty. London: Oxford University Press; 1969. New ed. in Berlin 2002.
Kremer S, van der Velde W, Wolf H. Erkenning in de forensische psychiatry. Waardenwerk (Editie 5455-2013). 2013.
Appelbaum PS. Foreword. In: Sisti DA, Caplan AL, Rimon-Greenspan H, editors. Applied ethics in mental health care: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013. p. xi–xvi. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5cx.4.
Appelbaum PS. Denying autonomy in order to create it: the paradox of forcing treatment upon addicts. In: Sisti DA, Caplan AL, Rimon-Greenspan H, editors. Applied ethics in mental health care: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013. p. 85–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5cx.13.
Pouncey CL, Lukens JM. Madness versus badness: the ethical tension between the recovery movement and forensic psychiatry. Theor Med Bioeth. 2010;31:93–105.
Szmukler G. “Personality disorder” and capacity to make treatment decisions. In: Sisti D, Caplan A, Rimon-Greenspan H, Appelbaum P, editors. Applied ethics in mental health care: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2013. p. 115–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5cx.15.
Pauly BM, Varcoe C, Storch J. Framing the issues: moral distress in health care. HEC Forum. 2012;24(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9176-y.
Schnall S, Haidt J, Clore GL, Jordan AH. Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;34(8):1096–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hettema, P. (2019). Ethical Aspects of Long-Stay Forensic Psychiatric Care. In: Völlm, B., Braun, P. (eds) Long-Term Forensic Psychiatric Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12594-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12594-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12593-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12594-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)