Abstract
Sexual offences are committed by a very heterogeneous population, within which we can distinguish paraphilic and non-paraphilic sex offenders (SOs). In addition, paraphiliacs vary in multiple factors, such as the target, origin, recurrence and intensity of their sexual fantasies, arousal or behaviours. Compared to other types of offenders, convicted SOs usually stay longer in forensic care, have more severe legal sanctions (e.g. community registration, residential restriction, extended supervision) and are perceived by the community as more dangerous. As a result, this affects their length of stay in care facilities. That is why accurately predicting recidivism is extremely important when it comes to SO. Actuarial instruments and professional guidelines help assessing the likelihood of a SO to reoffend in order to carefully make decisions that might seriously affect them and/or the community, such as their length of stay. Treatments should be chosen based on multiple factors, including demographic variables, information about the type of paraphilia, comorbidity with mental disorders, medical examination, past experiences, recidivism risk and risk of violence, personal and interpersonal factors and many others (even more so in adolescents). Combinations of pharmacological (i.e. SSRIs, antiandrogen treatment) and psychological (i.e. BT, CBT) interventions have proven their efficacy in reducing recidivism risk among SOs. Despite the profound social cost of paraphilic behaviour, paraphilic disorder is still under-researched.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barroso R, Leite A, Manita C, Nobre P. Between public agenda and the emergence of intervention programmes: sexual offenders within the Portuguese context. Sex Offender Treat. 2011;6(2):1–10.
Nobre PJ. Male sexual dysfunctions. In: Hoffman S, editor. Cognitive behavioral therapy: a complete reference guide: Vol 2. CBT for specific disorders. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
Bancroft J, Janssen E, Carnes L, Goodrich D, Strong D, Long JS. Sexual activity and risk taking in young heterosexual men: the relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. J Sex Res. 2004;41(2):181–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552226.
National Institute of Health. Metathesaurus, Version 2.1. 2016. Available via: https://ncim.nci.nih.gov/ncimbrowser/pages/concept_details.jsf?dictionary=NCI%20MetaThesaurus&code=C0036888&type=properties.
Thomas T. Sex crime: sex offending and society. New York: Routledge; 2016.
Abrahams N, Devries K, Watts C, Pallitto C, Petzold M, Shamu S, García-Moreno C. Worldwide prevalence of non-partner sexual violence: a systematic review. Lancet. 2014;383:1648–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62243-6.
Thibaut F. Les abus sexuels: des clefs indispensables pour comprendre, aider et prévenir. Paris: Odile Jacob Press; 2015.
Barroso R, Borduin C, Munschy R. Terapia Multissistémica com Adolescentes Agressores Sexuais (MST-PSB). In: Sani AI, Caridade S, editors. Práticas para a Intervenção na Violência e no Crime. Lisboa: Pactor; 2016.
Langton L, Berzofsky M, Krebs C, Smiley-McDonald H. Victimizations not reported to the police, 2006-2010: national crime victimization survey. Special report. NCJ 238536. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2012.
Wolitzky-Taylor KB, Resnick HS, Amstadter AB, McCauley JL, Ruggiero KJ, Kilpatrick DG. Is reporting of rape on the rise? A comparison of women with reported versus unreported rape experiences in the national women’s study-replication. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(4):807–32.
McLearen AM, Bazerman IE, Bracken-Minor K. Perpetrators of sexual violence: demographics, assessments, interventions. In: Pietz C, Mattson C, editors. Violent offenders: understanding and assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 216–31.
Robertiello G, Terry KJ. Can we profile sex offenders? A review of sex offender typologies. Aggress Violent Behav. 2007;12:508–18.
Eher R, Neuwirth W, Fruehwald S, Frottier P. Sexualization and lifestyle impulsivity: clinically valid discriminators in sexual offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2003;47:452–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03253844.
Seto M, Lalumière M. What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(4):526–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019700.
Thibaut F, DelaBarra F, Gordon H, Cosyns P, Bradford JM. The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of paraphilias. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010;11:604–55.
Thibaut F. Approche psychiatrique des déviances sexuelles. Paris: Springer; 2013.
Langström N, Babchishin KM, Fazel S, Lichtenstein P, Frisell T. Sexual offending runs in families: a 37-year nationwide survey. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):713–20.
Greenfeld L. Sex offenses and offenders. NCJ-163392. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1997.. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/SOO.PDF
Looman J, Gauthier C, Boer D. Replication of the Massachusetts treatment center child molester typology in a Canadian sample. J Interpers Violence. 2001;16:753–67.
Basile K, Smith S, Breiding M, Black M, Mahendra R. Sexual violence surveillance. Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2014. Available via: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv_surveillance_definitionsl-2009-a.pdf.
World Health Organisation. World report on violence and health. Geneva: WHO; 2002. Available via: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42495/1/9241545615_eng.pdf.
Holmes S, Homes R. Sex crimes: patterns and behavior. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2008.
Worling J, Langton C. A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended. Sex Abuse. 2015;27(1):127–42.
Kingston DA, Firestone P, Moulden HM, Bradford JM. The utility of the diagnosis of pedophilia: a comparison of various classifications procedures. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:423–36.
Lösel F, Schmucker M. The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol. 2005;1:117–46.
Quinsey VL, Lalumière M. Assessment of sexual offenders against children. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2001.
Seto M. Paedophilia and sexual offending against children. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2008.
O’Donohue W, Regev LG, Hagstrom A. Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sex Abus. 2000;12:95–105.
Sigre-Leirós V, Carvalho J, Nobre P. Cognitive schemas and sexual offending: differences between rapists, pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters, and nonsexual offenders. Child Abuse Negl. 2015;40:80–92.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: APA; 2013.
Tesson J, Cordier B, Thibaut F. Assessment of a new law for sex offenders implemented in France in 1998. L’Encéphale. 2012;38(2):133–40.
World Health Organisation. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Geneva: WHO; 1992. Available via: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/bluebook.pdf.
Beech AR, Miner MH, Thornton D. Paraphilias in the DSM-5. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:383–406.
Bradford JMW. The paraphilias, obsessive compulsive spectrum disorder, and the treatment of sexually deviant behaviour. Psychiatry Q. 1999;70(3):209–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022099026059.
Hall RC, Hall RCW. A profile of pedophilia: definition, characteristics of offenders, recidivism, treatment outcomes, and forensic issues. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(4):457–71. https://doi.org/10.4065/82.4.457.
Ward T, Beech T. An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggress Violent Behav. 2006;11:44–63.
Ward T, Fisher S, Beech A. An integrated theory of sexual offending. In: Hoberman HM, Phenix A, editors. Sexual offending: predisposing antecedents, assessments and management. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 1–15.
Quackenbush RE. The role of theory in the assessment of sex offenders. J Child Sex Abus. 2003;12(3–4):77–102.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD health statistics 2016 definitions, sources and methods. Paris: OECD; 2016. Available via: http://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.htm.
Oswald P, Saloppé X, Ducro C, Macquet D, Cornu PJ, Pham TH, Delaunoit B. Caractéristiques cliniques d’une population internée: Un cas particulier, de l’Etablissement de Défense Sociale « Les Marronniers » (Tournai, Belgique). L’Encéphale. 2017;43:229–34.
Elbogen B, Johnson S. The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(2):152–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.537.
Glied S, Frank RG. Mental illness and violence: lessons from the evidence. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e5–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301710.
Långström N, Sjöstedt G, Grann M. Psychiatric disorders and recidivism in sexual offenders. Sex Abus. 2004;16(2):139–50.
Kingston D, Olver M, Harris M, Wong S, Bradford J. The relationship between mental disorder and recidivism in sexual offenders. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2015;14(1):10–22.
Ross T, Querengasser J, Fontão M, Hoffmann K. Predicting discharge in forensic psychiatry: the legal and psychosocial factors associated with long and short stays in forensic psychiatric hospitals. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012;35:213–21.
Innocenti A, Hassing L, Lindqvist A, Andersson H, Enriksson L, Hanson F, Anckarsater H. First report from the Swedish National Forensic Psychiatric Register (SNFPR). Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014;37(3):231–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.013.
Cortoni F, Hanson RK. A review of the recidivism rates of adult female sexual offenders. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada; 2005.
Lamy S, Delavenne H, Thibaut F. A case of female hypersexuality and child abuse and a review. Arch Women Ment Health. 2016;19(4):701–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0579-z.
Catalonia Justice Department. Medidas penals alternatives [Alternative penal measures]. 2015. http://justicia.gencat.cat/ca/ambits/mesures_penals_alternativ/. Accessed 25 May 2016.
Hanson RK, Bussiere MT. Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66(2):348–62.
Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon K. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(6):1154–63.
Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess. 2009;21(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421.
Alexander MA. Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sex Abus. 1999;11:101–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658841.
Reitzel LR, Carbonell JL. The effectiveness of sexual offender treatment for juveniles as measured by recidivism: a meta-analysis. Sex Abus. 2006;18(4):401–21.
Malinen S, Willis G, Johnson L. Might informative media reporting of sexual offending influence community members’ attitudes towards sex offenders? J Psychol Crime Law. 2014;20(6):535–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.793770.
Bradford J, Federoff P, Gulati S. Can sexual offenders be treated? Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013;36:235–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.04.004.
Priest R, Smith A. Counseling adults sex offenders: unique challenges and treatment paradigms. J Couns Dev. 1992;71:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb02166.x.
Vess J. Fear and loathing in public policy: ethical issues in laws for sex offenders. Aggress Violent Behav. 2009;14:264–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.04.004.
Yang A. Historical criminal punishments, punitive aims and un-“civil” post-custody sanctions on sex offenders: reviving the ex post-facto clause as a bulwark of personal security and private rights. Univ Cincinnati Law Rev. 2007;75:1299–338.
European Committee on Crime Problems. Existing Council of Europe instruments and activities pertaining to quasi-compulsory measures (QCM). Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2012.
Dennis JA, Omer K, Michael F, Nick H, Melanie JP, Conor D. Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD007507. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.
Blumenthal S, Gudjonsson G, Burns J. Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex offenders against adults and children. Child Abuse Negl. 1999;23(2):129–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00117-3.
Hanson RK, Thornton D. Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: a comparison of three actuarial scales. Law Hum Behav. 2000;24:119–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333.
Kenworthy T, Adams CE, Bilby C, Brooks-Gordon B, Fenton M. Psychological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;3:Art. No.:CD004858.
Bartholomew A. A long-acting phenothiazine as a possible agent to control deviant sexual behavior. Am J Psychiatry. 1968;124:917–23. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.124.7.917.
Sterkman P, Geerts F. Is benperidol (RF 504) the specific drug for the treatment of excessive and disinhibited sexual behaviour? Acta Neurol Psychiatr (Belgique). 1996;66:1030–40.
Thibaut F, Kuhn JM, Colonna L. A possible antiaggressive effect of cyproterone acetate. Br J Psychiatry. 1991;159:298–9.
Coleman J, Cesnik AM, Moore S, Dwyer M. An exploratory study of the role of psychotropic medications in treatment of sexual offenders. J Offender Rehabil. 1992;18:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v18n03_08.
Garcia F, Thibaut F. Current concepts in the pharmacotherapy of paraphilias. Drugs. 2011;71(6):771–90. https://doi.org/10.2165/11585490-000000000-00000.
McMillan J. The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(9):583–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101030.
Thibaut F. Pharmacological treatment of paraphilias. Theol Sex. 2011;20(3):166–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2011.02.003.
Thibaut F, Bradford JM, Briken P, DelaBarra F, Hassler F, Cosyns P. The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the treatment of adolescent sexual offenders with paraphilic disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2015;17(1):2–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barroso, R., Pham, T., Greco, A.M., Thibaut, F. (2019). Challenges in the Treatment of Sex Offenders. In: Völlm, B., Braun, P. (eds) Long-Term Forensic Psychiatric Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12594-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12594-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12593-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12594-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)