Abstract
In every form of digital store-and-forward communication, intermediate forwarding nodes are computers, with attendant memory and processing resources. This has inevitably stimulated efforts to create a wide-area infrastructure that goes beyond simple store-and-forward to create a platform that makes more general and varied use of the potential of this collection of increasingly powerful nodes. Historically, these efforts predate the advent of globally routed packet networking. The desire for a converged infrastructure of this kind has only intensified over the last 30 years, as memory, storage, and processing resources have increased in both density and speed while simultaneously decreasing in cost. Although there is a general consensus that it should be possible to define and deploy such a dramatically more capable wide-area platform, a great deal of investment in research prototypes has yet to produce a credible candidate architecture. Drawing on technical analysis, historical examples, and case studies, we present an argument for the hypothesis that in order to realize a distributed system with the kind of convergent generality and deployment scalability that might qualify as “future-defining,” we must build it from a small set of simple, generic, and limited abstractions of the low level resources (processing, storage and network) of its intermediate nodes.
Dr. Beck is an Associate Professor at University of Tennessee, Knoxville. he is currently on detail to the National Science Foundation in the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure. The work discussed herein was completed prior to his government service and does not reflect the views, conclusions, or opinions of the National Science Foundation or of the U.S. Government.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mynatt, E., Clark, J., Hager, G., Lopresti, D., Morrisett, G., Nahrstedt, K., Pappas, G., Patel, S., Rexford, J., Wright, H., et al.: A national research agenda for intelligent infrastructure. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.01920 (2017)
Networking, I. T. Research, and D. N. Program.: Smart and Connected Cities Framework. https://www.nitrd.gov/sccc/materials/scccframework.pdf (2015)
Nahrstedt, K., Cassandras, C.G., Catlett, C.: City-scale intelligent systems and platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.01990 (2017)
Anderson, T., Peterson, L., Shenker, S., Turner, J.: Overcoming the internet impasse through virtualization. Computer 38(4), 34–41 (2005)
Tennenhouse, D.L., Wetherall, D.J.: Towards an active network architecture. Comput. Commun. Rev. 26, 5–18 (1996)
Foster, I., Kesselman, C.: The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, pp. 47–48. Advanced computing. Computer systems design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1999)
Chun, B., Culler, D., Roscoe, T., Bavier, A., Peterson, L., Wawrzoniak, M., Bowman, M.: Planetlab: an overlay testbed for broad-coverage services. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 33(3), 3–12 (2003)
McGeer, R., Berman, M., Elliott, C., Ricci, R. (eds.): The GENI Book. Springer, Berlin (2016)
Clark, D.D.: Interoperation, open interfaces, and protocol architecture. Unpredictable Certainty White Pap. 2, 133–144 (1995)
Uux(1p) posix programmer’s manual (2013)
Saltzer, J.H., Reed, D.P., Clark, D.D.: End-to-end arguments in system design. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2(4), 277–288 (1984)
Carpenter, B., Brim, S.: Middleboxes: Taxonomy and issues. RFC 3234, Feb 2002. Network Working Group
Dongarra, J., Golub, G.H., Grosse, E., Moler, C., Moore, K.: Netlib and NA-Net: building a scientific computing community. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 30, 30–41 (2008)
Chankhunthod, A., Danzig, P.B., Neerdaels, C., Schwartz, M.F., Worrell, K.J.: A hierarchical Internet object cache. In: Proceedings of the 1996 USENIX Technical Conference, pp. 153–163 (1995)
Wessels, D., Claffy, K.: ICP and the Squid web cache. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 16, 345–357 (1998)
Beck, M., Moore, T.: The Internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project: an architecture for internet content channels. In: Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, pp. 2141–2148 (1998)
Kirkpatrick, D.: IBM’s Olympic Fiasco Department of Groundless Optimism. Fortune Magazine, 9 Sept 1996
Buyya, R., Pathan, M., Vakali, A. (eds.): Content Delivery Networks. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Nygren, E., Sitaraman, R.K., Sun, J.: The Akamai network: a platform for high-performance internet applications. In: SIGOPS Operating Systems Review (2010)
Beck, M., Moore, T., Plank, J.S.: An end-to-end approach to globally scalable network storage. In: ACM SIGCOMM 2002 (2002)
Beck, M., Moore, T., Plank, J.S.: An end-to-end approach to globally scalable programmable networking. In: Future Directions in Network Architecture, pp. 328–339. ACM Press (2003)
David, P.A.: Path dependence: a foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica 1(2), 91–114 (2007)
Messerschmitt, D.G.: The convergence of telecommunications and computing: what are the implications today? Proc. IEEE 84(8), 1167–1186 (1996)
Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: Mapreduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 51(1), 107–113 (2008)
Peterson, L.L., Davie, B.S.: Computer Networks: A Systems Approach, 5th edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA (2011)
Beck, M.: On the hourglass model, end-to-end arguments, and deployment scalability. Commun, ACM (to appear 2018)
Will the real end-to-end argument please stand up? http://mercury.lcs.mit.edu/jnc/tech/end_end.html
Ritchie, D.M., Thompson, K.: The Unix time-sharing system. Commun. ACM 17, 365–375 (1974)
Satyanarayanan, M.: The emergence of edge computing. Computer 50(1), 30–39 (2017)
Plank, J.S., Bassi, A., Beck, M., Moore, T., Swany, D.M., Wolski, R.: Managing data storage in the network. IEEE Internet Comput. 5(5), 50–58 (2001)
Beck, M., Arnold, D., Bassi, R., Berman, F., Casanova, H., Moore, T., Obertelli, G., Plank, J., Swany, M., Vadhiyar, S., Wolski, R.: Logistical computing and internetworking: middleware for the use of storage in communication. In: In 3rd Annual International Workshop on Active Middleware Services (AMS) (2001)
Plank, J.S., Atchley, S., Ding, Y., Beck, M.: Algorithms for high performance, wide-area, distributed file downloads. Technical report, Letters (2002)
Beck, M., Liu, H., Huang, J., Moore, T.: Scalable distributed execution environment for large data visualization. In: IEEE Explorer, Nov 2007
Liu, H.: Scalable, data-intensive network computation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (2008)
Liu, H., Beck, M., Huang, J.: Dynamic co-scheduling of distributed computation and replication. In: IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, May 2006
Kitchin, R.: The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and their Consequences. Sage, London (2014)
Reichman, O.J., Jones, M.B., Schildhauer, M.P.: Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science 331(6018), 703–705 (2011)
Board, S.S., Council, N.R., et al.: Landsat and Beyond: Sustaining and Enhancing the Nation’s Land Imaging Program. National Academies Press (2014)
Bird, I.: Computing for the Large Hadron Collider. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 61, 99–118 (2011)
Breeding, M.: Building a digital library of television news. Comput. Libr. 23(6), 47–49 (2003)
Wikipedia Contributors. Information logistics (2017) (Online). Accessed 15 Sept 2018
Banerjee, S., Wu, D.O.: Final report from the NSF Workshop on Future Directions in Wireless Networking. National Science Foundation (2013)
Chen, M., Mao, S., Liu, Y.: Big data: a survey. Mobile Netw. Appl. 19(2), 171–209 (2014)
Avron, H., Maymounkov, P., Toledo, S.: Blendenpik: supercharging LAPACK’s least-squares solver. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32(3), 1217–1236 (2010)
Drineas, P., Mahoney, M.W.: RandNLA: randomized numerical linear algebra. Commun. ACM 59(6), 80–90 (2016)
Valiant, L.G.: A theory of the learnable. Commun. ACM 27, 1134–1142 (1984)
Acknowledgements
The ideas in this paper were influenced by many spirited discussions with Martin Swany on the integration of storage and processing with scalable networking, and by recent conversations with Glenn Ricart on the definition and justification of interoperable convergence. The concept of “exposed buffer protocol/processing” was coined during discussions between Swany and Beck, although its best definition and implementation are still subject to debate. The authors are also indebted to David Rogers for his professional rendering of the artwork in this any many other papers and presentations, and to Chris Brumgard for his helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Beck, M., Moore, T., Luszczek, P., Danalis, A. (2020). Interoperable Convergence of Storage, Networking, and Computation. In: Arai, K., Bhatia, R. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 70. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12385-7_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12385-7_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12384-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12385-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)