Abstract
Systematic errors bias measurements. Obviously, cheating is a biasing factor . Answer copying is a type of cheating , which can be detected by answer-copying indices. Satisficing is responding to items with less than optimal efforts. It is detectable by building instructional manipulation checks or bogus items into the test. A response style is a typical way of taking a test. Plodding is a style where test takers start slowly and take much time to answer items. It is counteracted by informing test takers on the amount of time and number of items that remain. Fumbling is a style where test takers start rather panicky. It cannot be prevented, but testing should be less panic arousing as possible. The extremity and midpoint styles are the tendencies to choose extreme and midpoint answer categories, respectively. Acquiescence and dissentience are tendencies of yea- and nay-saying, respectively, and are detectable if the test is balanced (i.e., has about equal numbers of indicative and contra-indicative items). Satisficing and fumbling yield aberrant response patterns and acquiescence and dissentience aberrant response patterns at balanced tests that are detectable by person-fit indices. Item nonresponse is the tendency to skip items. It is reduced by computerized test administration and re-approaching test takers who omitted items. These styles and tendencies are sometimes person characteristics that are of interest of their own. Deleting test takers who show styles or tendencies yields missing data that have to be handled in the analysis of the data (see Chap. 16).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Beach, D. A. (1989). Identifying the random responder. The Journal of Psychology, 123, 101–103.
Couch, A., & Keniston, K. (1960). Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 151–174.
de Vries, A. L. M. (2006). The merit of ipsative measurement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Netherlands, Maastricht: University.
DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazarsfeld, S. A. Star, & J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp. 60–90). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Huisman, M., Krol, B., & van Sonderen, F. L. P. (1998). Handling missing data by re-approaching nonrespondents. Quality & Quantity, 32, 77–91.
Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Questions and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263–313). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455.
Meijer, R. R. (1994). The number of Guttman errors as a simple and powerful person-fit statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 311–314.
Meijer, R. R., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Methodology review: Evaluating person fit. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 107–135.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (2011). A conceptual introduction to psychometrics: Development, analysis, and application of psychological and educational tests. The Hague, The Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing.
Miyazaki, I. (1963/1981). China’s examination hell (C. Schirokauer). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
Rorer, L. G. (1965). The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 129–156.
Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sotaridona, L. S., van der Linden, W. J., & Meijer, R. R. (2006). Detecting answer copying using statistic kappa. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 412–431.
Wollack, J. A. (2006). Simultaneous use of multiple answer copying indexes to improve detection rates. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 265–288.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago, IL: Mesa Press.
Zopluogo, C. (2013). CopyDetect: An R package for computing statistical indices to detect answer copying on multiple-choice examinations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 93–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mellenbergh, G.J. (2019). Systematic Measurement Error. In: Counteracting Methodological Errors in Behavioral Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12272-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12272-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74352-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12272-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)