Skip to main content

Abstract

Nonprobability sampling selects units nonrandomly. It is very common in the behavioral science research, for example, psychology freshmen or Internet users are asked to participate in a study. Moreover, a probability sample becomes a nonprobability sample if some of the selected persons are nonrandomly missing or drop out of the study. Nonprobability sampling is threatened by systematic errors that bias the study results. Three procedures are described to control for bias. First, representative sampling: a sample is selected that is judged to be representative for the population. Second, applying weighting procedures in the analysis of the data. Third, comparing study results across different subpopulations (e.g., males and females, younger and older participants, and so on). If study results are approximately the same across different groups, generalization of the study results is supported. However, generalization from a nonprobability sample to a population cannot be based on statistical theory. Therefore, probability sampling has to be preferred above nonprobability sampling .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78, 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 665–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gideon J. Mellenbergh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mellenbergh, G.J. (2019). Nonprobability Sampling. In: Counteracting Methodological Errors in Behavioral Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12272-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics