Skip to main content

On Using 3D Support Geometries for Measuring Human-Made Corner Structures with a Robotic Total Station

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 567 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 983))

Abstract

Performing accurate measurements on non-planar targets using a robotic total station in reflectorless mode is prone to errors. Besides requiring a fully reflected laser beam of the electronic distance meter, a proper orientation of the pan-tilt unit is required for each individual accurate 3D point measurement. Dominant physical 3D structures like corners and edges often don’t fulfill these requirements and are not directly measurable.

In this work, three algorithms and user interfaces are evaluated through simulation and physical measurements for simple and efficient construction-side measurement correction of systematic errors. We incorporate additional measurements close to the non-measurable target, and our approach does not require any post-processing of single-point measurements. Our experimental results prove that the systematic error can be lowered by almost an order of magnitude by using support geometries, i.e. incorporating a 3D point, a 3D line or a 3D plane as additional measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unity3D and MATLAB can be used with gRPC by compiling the abstraction layer to shared C++ libraries.

  2. 2.

    The analysis does not follow the ISO 17123 standard [17], since we conduct only a comparative studies of the proposed methods with non-direct measurable targets.

  3. 3.

    Analogue to GUM, we use the same symbol is as the physical quantity and as the random variable for economy of notation [18].

  4. 4.

    Higher precision arithmetic require explicit implementation of the scene graph and related operations.

  5. 5.

    MATLAB standard settings for box plots, function boxplot, statistics toolbox.

  6. 6.

    Note that we use a half-set for our evaluations, since we do not use the second telescope face (face right).

  7. 7.

    Note that we performed the ground truth measurements immediately before the experiments, to ensure that errors due to changes in environmental conditions are negligible.

References

  1. Uren, J., Price, B.: Surveying for Engineers. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulz, T.: Calibration of a terrestrial laser scanner for engineering geodesy. Ph.D. thesis. ETH Zurich, Switzerland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nichols, J.M., Beavers, J.E.: Development and calibration of an earthquake fatality function. Earthq. Spectra 19, 605–633 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coaker, L.H.: Reflectorless total station measurements and their accuracy, precision and reliability. B.S. thesis. University of Southern Queensland (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reda, A., Bedada, B.: Accuracy analysis and calibration of total station based on the reflectorless distance measurement. Master’s thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Sweden (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin, D., Gatta, G.: Calibration of total stations instruments at the ESRF. In: Proceedings of XXIII FIG Congress, pp. 1–14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klug, C., Schmalstieg, D., Arth, C.: Measuring human-made corner structures with a robotic total station using support points, lines and planes, pp. 17–27. INSTICC, SciTePress (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Juretzko, M.: Reflektorlose Video-Tachymetrie - Ein Integrales Verfahren zur Erfassung Geometrischer und Visueller Informationen. Ph.D. thesis. Ruhr University Bochum, Faculty of Civil Engineering (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zeiske, K.: Surveying made easy (2004). https://www.aps.anl.gov/files/APS-Uploads/DET/Detector-Pool/Beamline-Components/Lecia_Optical_Level/Surveying_en.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2018

  10. Corporation, T.: Imaging station is series, instruction manual (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siu, M.F., Lu, M., AbouRizk, S.: Combining photogrammetry and robotic total stations to obtain dimensional measurements of temporary facilities in construction field. Vis. Eng. 1, 4 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fathi, H., Brilakis, I.: A videogrammetric as-built data collection method for digital fabrication of sheet metal roof panels. Adv. Eng. Inf. 27, 466–476 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrhart, M., Lienhart, W.: Image-based dynamic deformation monitoring of civil engineering structures from long ranges. In: Image Processing: Machine Vision Applications VIII, vol. 9405, pp. 94050J–94050J-14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jadidi, H., Ravanshadnia, M., Hosseinalipour, M., Rahmani, F.: A step-by-step construction site photography procedure to enhance the efficiency of as-built data visualization: a case study. Vis. Eng. 3, 1–12 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scherer, M.: Intelligent scanning with robot-tacheometer and image processing: a low cost alternative to 3D laser scanning? In: FIG Working Week (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 24, 381–395 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Iso 17123–3: Optics and optical instruments - field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. JCGM 100:2008 - Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Standard, Int. Organ. Stand. Geneva ISBN (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Box, G.E.P., Muller, M.E.: A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 29, 610–611 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Unity Technologies: Unity3D: Game engine. https://unity3d.com. Accessed 28 July 2017

  21. Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., Licata, L.: Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 764–766 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was enabled by the Competence Center VRVis. VRVis is funded by BMVIT, BMWFW, Styria, SFG and Vienna Business Agency under the scope of COMET - Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies (854174) which is managed by FFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Arth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Klug, C., Schmalstieg, D., Gloor, T., Arth, C. (2019). On Using 3D Support Geometries for Measuring Human-Made Corner Structures with a Robotic Total Station. In: Cláudio, A., et al. Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics – Theory and Applications. VISIGRAPP 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12209-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12209-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12208-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12209-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics