Abstract
The goal of this chapter is to demonstrate how persuasion strategies relate to ideology. Taking a constructionist approach, the chapter considers active roles of both persuaders and the audience in persuasion events. As the context of persuasion includes the audience, this chapter argues that persuasion strategies are influenced by the way writers imagine their audience’s values and beliefs. To examine these values and beliefs, the chapter provides an illustrative case study of self-improvement books. A move analysis of 20 body chapters from 20 different self-improvement books identifies three resources that writers use to persuade their audience: problem–solution structure, tentative language, and coherence markers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288–297.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed. and C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204.
Cherry, S. (2008). The ontology of a self-help book: A paradox of its own existence. Social Semiotics, 18(3), 337–348.
Connor, U., & Lauer, J. (1988). Cross-cultural variation in persuasive student writing. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures (pp. 138–159). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95–113.
Fuertes-Olivera, P. A., et al. (2001). Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(8), 1291–1307.
Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2004). Relational practice in the workplace: Women’s talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society, 33(3), 377–398.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437–455.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–193.
Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1–23.
Hyon, S. (2018). Introducing genre and English for specific purposes. New York: Routledge.
Roitman, M. (2014). Presidential candidates’ ethos of credibility: The case of the presidential pronoun I in the 2012 Hollande-Sarkozy debate. Discourse & Society, 25(6), 741–765.
Rosenblatt, L. (1993). The transactional theory: Against dualisms. College English, 55(4), 377–386.
Virtanen, T., & Halmari, H. (2005). Persuasion across genres: Emerging perspectives. In H. Halmari & T. Virtanen (Eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Woodstock, L. (2006). All about me, I mean, you: The trouble with narrative authority in self-help literature. Communication Review, 9(4), 321–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koay, J. (2019). Persuasion in Context. In: Persuasion in Self-improvement Books. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12149-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12149-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12148-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12149-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)