Abstract
This chapter is primarily autobiographical in nature. It begins with a discussion of certain early-career teaching experiences which inspired the author’s critique of the practices that have long been widely accepted among mainstream research psychologists for interpreting the results of population-level statistical analyses. The discussion then moves to an overview of publications stemming from the 1980s in which various facets of the critique and accompanying ideas were elaborated. The last major section of the chapter treats of the reception of the critique among defenders and devoted practitioners of the mainstream interpretive practices challenged by the critique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Allport, G. W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21, 1–10.
Cattell, R. B. (1944). Psychological measurement: Normative, ipsative, interactive. Psychological Review, 51, 292–303.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
Dar, R., & Serlin, R. C. (1990). For whom the bell curve toils: Universality in individual differences research. In D. N. Robinson & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 193–199). New York: Plenum.
Dilthey, W. (1894). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie [Toward a descriptive and analytical psychology] (Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, zweiter Halbband), pp. 1309–1407.
Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The science of personality: Nomothetic! Psychological Review, 61, 339–342.
Harré, R. (2006). Key thinkers in psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstee, W. K. B. (2007). Unbehagen in individual differences—A review. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 252–253. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.4.252.
Holt, R. (1962). Individuality and generalization in the psychology of personality. Journal of Personality, 30, 377–404.
Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36, 276–289.
Lamiell, J. T. (1982). The case for an idiothetic psychology of personality: A conceptual and empirical foundation. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 11, pp. 1–84). New York: Academic Press.
Lamiell, J. T. (1986a). Epistemological tenets of an idiothetic psychology of personality. In A. Angleitner, A. Furnham, & G. van Heck (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Current issues and controversies (pp. 3–22). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Lamiell, J. T. (1986b). What is nomothetic about “nomothetic” personality research? The Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 6, 97–107.
Lamiell, J. T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lamiell, J. T. (1990a). Explanation in the psychology of personality. In D. N. Robinson and L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 153–192). New York: Plenum Press.
Lamiell, J. T. (1990b). Let’s be careful out there. In D. N. Robinson & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 219–231). New York: Plenum Press.
Lamiell, J. T. (1997). Individuals and the differences between them. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 117–141). New York: Academic Press.
Lamiell, J. T. (1998). ‘Nomothetic’ and ‘idiographic’: Contrasting Windelband’s understanding with contemporary usage. Theory and Psychology, 8, 23–38.
Lamiell, J. T. (2000). A periodic table of personality elements? The “Big Five” and trait “Psychology” in critical perspective. The Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 20, 1–24.
Lamiell, J. T. (2003). Beyond individual and group differences: Human individuality, scientific psychology, and William Stern’s critical personalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lamiell, J. T. (2010). William Stern (1871–1938): A brief introduction to his life and works. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
Lamiell, J. T., & Trierweiler, S. J. (1986a). Personality measurement and intuitive personality judgments from an idiothetic point of view. Clinical Psychology Review, 6, 471–491.
Lamiell, J. T., & Trierweiler, S. J. (1986b). Interactive measurement, idiothetic inquiry and the challenge to conventional “nomotheticism”. Journal of Personality, 54, 460–469.
Lamiell, J. T., Trierweiler, S. J., & Foss, M. A. (1983). Detecting (in)consistencies in personality: Reconciling intuitions and empirical evidence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 380–389.
McClelland, D. C. (1951). Personality. New York: Sloane.
McReynolds, P. (1989). Review of J. T. Lamiell, ‘The Psychology of Personality: An Epistemological Inquiry.’ Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 113.
Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: Positivism, naïve realism, and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13, 5–31.
Michell, J. (2011). Qualitative research meets the ghost of Pythagoras. Theory and Psychology, 21, 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310391351.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1986a). Nomothetic and idiothetic measurement in personality. Journal of Personality, 54, 447–459.
Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1986b). Idiothetic inquiry and the toil of Sisyphus. Journal of Personality, 54, 470–477.
Rorer, L. G., & Widiger, T. A. (1983). Personality structure and assessment. Annual review of psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 431–463). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
Ross, A. O. (1987). Personality: The scientific study of complex human behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Sanford, N. (1963). Personality: Its place in psychology. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 5, pp. 488–592). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Windelband, W. (1894/1998). History and natural science (J. T. Lamiell, Trans.). Theory and Psychology, 8, 6–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lamiell, J.T. (2019). Challenging the Canon: The Critique and Its Aftermath in Autobiographical Perspective. In: Psychology’s Misuse of Statistics and Persistent Dismissal of its Critics. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12131-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12131-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12130-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12131-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)