Abstract
Here, instant messaging as a mode of everyday communication in digital families is taken up for examination. We look, in particular, into the qualities that make WhatsApp an attractive communication tool for extended families: it allows both one-to-one and one-to-many interactions and provides multiple modalities for intergenerational family communication (voice, text, photos and videos). Empirical evidence and qualitative data collected in Finland and Italy in 2014–2015 are drawn upon and analysed in advancing the argument that the success story of WhatsApp in the family context is related to way it enables reaching the whole family at once and promotes ‘phatic communion’ via small messages.
Keywords
The analysis presented in this chapter was originally published in Taipale and Farinosi (2018).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AudienceProject. (2016). Insights: Social media and Apps in the Nordics. Retrieved from https://www.audienceproject.com/wp-content/uploads/social_media_and_apps_nordics.pdf.
Austin, G. C. (2017). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(3), 293–296.
Baron, N. S. (2010). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217–231.
Chen, W., Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2002). The global villagers: Comparing internet users and uses around the world. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 74–113). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Church, K. & de Oliveira, R. (2014). What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. MobileHCI’ 2013, August 27–30, 2013, Munich. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493225.
Stern, C. (2015). Messaging will be Facebook’s ‘next major wave of innovation and financial windfall. Business Insider Jun. 24, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/facebooks-next-big-profit-driver-is-messaging-2015-6?r=US&IR=T&IR=T.
Eranti, V., & Lonkila, M. (2015). The social significance of the Facebook Like button. First Monday, 20(6). Retrieved https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i6.5505.
Fortunati, L., & Taipale, S. (2017). Mobile communication: Media effects. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), International encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1241–1252). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fortunati, L., Taipale, S., & de Luca, F. (2013). What happened to body-to-body sociability? Social Science Research, 42(3), 893–905.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Grinter, R. E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: ACM.
Gurak, L. J. (2003). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with awareness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hänninen, R., Taipale, S., & Korhonen, A. (2018). Refamilisation in the broadband society. The effects of ICTs on family solidarity in Finland. Journal of Family Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2018.1515101.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Horst, H. A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6(2), 143–159.
Johns, N. A. (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16(3), 113–131.
Johnston, M. J., King, D., Arora, S., Behar, N., Athanasiou, T., Sevdalis, N., et al. (2015). Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: An analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. The American Journal of Surgery, 209(1), 45–51.
Karapanos, E., Teixeira, P., & Gouveia, R. (2016). Need fulfillment and experiences on social media: A case on Facebook and WhatsApp. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, part B, 888–897.
Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2001/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf.pdf.
Lim, S. S. (Ed.). (2016). Mobile communication and the family. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ling, R. (2007). Children, youth, and mobile communication. Journal of Children and Media, 1(1), 60–67.
Ling, R., & Baron, N. S. (2007). Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 291–298.
Ling, R., & Lai, C. H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media & Society, 13(3), 457–470.
Malinowski, B. (1923/1994). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden & I.A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 435–496). London: Routledge.
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387–400.
Nag, W., Ling, R., & Jakobsen, M. H. (2016). Keep out! Join in! Cross-generation communication on the mobile internet in Norway. Journal of Children and Media, 10(4), 411–425.
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 79–88). New York, NY: ACM.
O’Hara, K., Massimi, M., Harpe, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1131–1143). New York, NY: ACM.
Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J. C., & Hampton, K. N. (2002). Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 291–324). Oxford: Blackwell.
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ribak, R. (2009). Remote control, umbilical cord and beyond: The mobile phone as a transitional object. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 183–196.
Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2016). Beyond WhatsApp: Older people and smartphones. Revista Română de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 18(1), 27–47.
Siibak, A., & Tamme, V. (2013). ‘Who introduced granny to Facebook?’: An exploration of everyday family interactions in web-based communication environments. Northern lights: Film & media studies yearbook, 11(1), 71–89.
Statista. (2017). Number of monthly active WhatsApp users worldwide from April 2013 to December 2017. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/260819/number-of-monthly-active-whatsapp-users/.
Taipale, S., & Farinosi, M. (2018). The Big Meaning of Small Messages: The Use of WhatsApp in Intergenerational Family Communication. In J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (Eds.): Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 532–546). Cham: Springer.
Taipale, S., Petrovčič, A., & Dolničar, V. (2018). Intergenerational solidarity and ICT usage: Empirical insights from Finnish and Slovenian families In S. Taipale, T.-A.- Wilska, & C. Gilleard (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 68–86). London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Taloustutkimus. (2014). Social media survey for YLE. Retrieved from http://www.yle.fi/tvuutiset/uutiset/upics/liitetiedostot/yle_somekysely.pdf.
Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125–142.
Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), 51–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taipale, S. (2019). The Big Meaning of Small Messages. In: Intergenerational Connections in Digital Families. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11947-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11947-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11946-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11947-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)